Mueller Report Released. Thoughts?

[LuisDantas]

Allow me to suggest a video by one of my favorite political commentators.

As you can see, he finds the redacted report plenty clear in lots of ways, and it does not look good for Trump. Not good at all. Or even for Barr, who ought to expect to be impeached himself real soon.

 

[Woberts]

This is how low the republican party has now sunk; as long as their candidate wins, they really don't care how, or at what the cost to the democratic process. And they don't even care how pathetically bad their candidate is, so long as the dems are humiliated.

Of course, they were always terrible. Eating apple pie 'round the ol' lynchin' tree does that to you.

 

[esmith]

Allow me to suggest a video by one of my favorite political commentators.

As you can see, he finds the redacted report plenty clear in lots of ways, and it does not look good for Trump. Not good at all. Or even for Barr, who ought to expect to be impeached himself real soon.

In your dreams maybe.

 

[LuisDantas]

In your dreams maybe.

Tell me about your dreams...

 

[Revoltingest]

Of course, they were always terrible. Eating apple pie 'round the ol' lynchin' tree does that to you.

This is an odd image.
Twas your party which supported slavery, Jim Crow, & lynchings.
To try to paint the other side with historical baggage poses the old
rocks in glass houses problem for Democrats.

Back on topic, what do you think the Mueller report shows?

 

[PureX]

This is an odd image.
Twas your party which supported slavery, Jim Crow, & lynchings.
To try to paint the other side with historical baggage poses the old
rocks in glass houses problem for Democrats.

Back on topic, what do you think the Mueller report shows?

But those old 'dixie-crats' are all die-hard Trump republicans, now.

 

[Revoltingest]

But those old 'dixie-crats' are all die-hard Trump republicans, now.

Way to miss the point.

 

[esmith]

Tell me about your dreams...

You really don't want to go there.

 

[PureX]

Way to miss the point.

Wobert's point wasn't about their political labels, it was about their motives. I guess you didn't understand that since you tried to make it about political labels.

 

[Revoltingest]

Wobert's point wasn't about their political labels, it was about their motives.

Missed it again.
I showed that demonizing a group using history
can cause one to be hoist by their own petard.

 

[PureX]

Missed it again.
I showed that demonizing a group using history
can cause one to be hoist by their own petard.

Which was, of course, irrelevant to the point Woberts was making. But it served as a tangential distraction, which is what you were really after. Since looking at the depths to which the current republican party has sunk is reasonably unpleasant for someone who still supports them.

 

[Revoltingest]

Which was, of course, irrelevant to the point Woberts was making.

I pointed out his duplicity.
If you don't like it, tough noogies.

 

[LuisDantas]

You really don't want to go there.

Probably. But that amounts to declaring that I should not care about what you say, think or crave, doesn't it?

 

[esmith]

Probably. But that amounts to declaring that I should not care about what you say, think or crave, doesn't it?

No, all it says are my dreams a predicated on many external factors both past and present that have little bearing on how I perceive today's world.

 

[Woberts]

Twas your party

Already wrong.

​

which supported slavery, Jim Crow, & lynchings.

The Democrats of yesteryear are Republicans now. Democrats of yesteryear were on the right. Therefor, the right are the racists. Guess which party that is?

To try to paint the other side with historical baggage poses the old
rocks in glass houses problem for Democrats.

Only if you're too stupid to look past the "We're not the racists, look what the democrats did a hundred years ago! Ignore our racist members, it was them I tells ya!' line that apparently got you hook, line, and sinker.

Back on topic, what do you think the Mueller report shows?

And then an attempt to avoid criticism. Nice.

 

[Shadow Link]

In a nutshell...

"Don’t get lulled into thinking this thing is over; it is not. The Democrats don’t want people to notice the long-planned and coordinated Pelosi launch platform. The collective “left” want to run the impeachment hearing through the media, not the actual House of Representatives. Then they want the “impeachment vote” to take place at the polls in 2020." -Sundance

 

[Revoltingest]

And then an attempt to avoid criticism.

I was hoping to get you back on track for the thread,
& avoid your derailing it with specious & hypocritical
playing of the racist history card. No luck there, eh.

 

[Shadow Link]

In a nutshell...

"Don’t get lulled into thinking this thing is over; it is not. The Democrats don’t want people to notice the long-planned and coordinated Pelosi launch platform. The collective “left” want to run the impeachment hearing through the media, not the actual House of Representatives. Then they want the “impeachment vote” to take place at the polls in 2020." -Sundance

[Nancy Pelosi] “I’m not for impeachment. This is news. I’m going to give you some news right now because I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this: Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.” (Nancy Pelosi on impeaching President Trump: ‘He’s just not worth it’ - The Washington Post)

 

[LuisDantas]

No, all it says are my dreams a predicated on many external factors both past and present that have little bearing on how I perceive today's world.

If you say so.

Hopefully you will see fit to be more open some time in the future.

Meanwhile, be prepared for the fallout on Barr and Trump.

 

[Woberts]

I was hoping to get you back on track for the thread,
& avoid your derailing it with specious & hypocritical
playing of the racist history card. No luck there, eh.

Yes, I'm the specious one. The one who's never opened a history book, judging from your historical knowledge, is correct. My apologies, milord.