• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mueller Report Released. Thoughts?

Stanyon

WWMRD?
Russians paid people to wear Santa outfits with Trump masks on, a sure way to undermine American democracy and cause division.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Are you including the campaign finance violations that he made in this statement?
No, they're not significant. Campaign finance laws are so complex that violations
are normal, even when there's no intent to violate. But even if they were, the term
"crime boss" applies to organizations with primary criminal intent, eg, William Marcy
Tweed, Don Corleone, Al Capone, Bugsy Siegel. (I made it diverse by putting a
Jew in there.)
Even the left's vaunted AOC's organization, has thus run afoul of the law.
Would you call her a "crime boss", or just a "goombah"?
Nah...just a politician. I don't see intent to violate the law there.
Let's judge them by what prosecutions reveal, eh.

On 2nd thought, government being a hotbed of criminal activity in the normal course
of affairs of state, nearly every President could be considered a "crime boss", what
with war crimes, domestic surveillance, subversion of the Constitution, etc, etc.
But that would be to mischievously broaden the meaning of the term.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Nah it's a coup. Follow the digital footprint, and see where it leads. It was a coup plain and simple.
A takeover by legal means is not a "coup" in the sense of "coup d'etat.
the definition of coup d'état
a sudden and decisive action in politics, especially one resulting in a change of government illegallyor by force.
Let us carefully observe the difference between dictionary definitions & hyperbole.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It was illegal because it was based on a false report. The report was bought knowing it was false. That makes the investigation illegal. Hence it's a coup.
A false report doesn't relied upon by those who'd dethrone Trump doesn't
violate the law. This is no more a coup than seeking to impeach Nixon or Clinton.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
A false report doesn't relied upon by those who'd dethrone Trump doesn't
violate the law. This is no more a coup than seeking to impeach Nixon or Clinton.

Are you serious?

Fabricating a document then submitting it to the government is a felony.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Are you serious?
Fabricating a document then submitting it to the government is a felony.
If so, then it would be a crime by those who perpetrated it.
The movement to dump Trump is far far wider than those few.
As you can see on RF, many want him impeached simply for
his boorish behavior, & for fantasies that he's Hitler reincarnated.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
If so, then it would be a crime by those who perpetrated it.
The movement to dump Trump is far far wider than those few.
As you can see on RF, many want him impeached simply for
his boorish behavior, & for fantasies that he's Hitler reincarnated.

No, the ones that fabricated the document are not the ones that submitted it.

The ones that fabricate it sold it to someone who I will not name (I'll let Mueller report sort that out). Who bought it with the intent of buying a fabricated document, and the knowledge it was fabricated when they bought it, then passed it off to someone else who then submitted it.

Its deceitful intent and well its treason really at the end of day.

It is a failed coup attempt, and heads need to roll.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No, the ones that fabricated the document are not the ones that submitted it.

The ones that fabricate it sold it to someone who I will not name (I'll let Mueller report sort that out). Who bought it with the intent of buying a fabricated document, and the knowledge it was fabricated when they bought it, then passed it off to someone else who then submitted it.

Its deceitful intent and well its treason really at the end of day.

It is a failed coup attempt, and heads need to roll.
We must agree to disagree about there being an attempted coup d'etat.
That's almost as extreme as those who claim Trump is a dictator, Nazi,
or white supremacist.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Countries interfere with other countries elections all the time. All of them do it to each other all the time. This is no revelation.

It was a failed coup attempt by butt hurt Dems who lost the plot years ago, and are slipping further into madness with each passing day.
This is how low the republican party has now sunk; as long as their candidate wins, they really don't care how, or at what the cost to the democratic process. And they don't even care how pathetically bad their candidate is, so long as the dems are humiliated.
 
Top