Muslim woman & girl gang-raped and beaten by Hindus for eating beef

[Madhuri]

My thoughts:

If it's against the law to kill cows, don't kill cows.
If someone eats beef when it's against the law, don't gang rape them.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

My thoughts:

If it's against the law to kill cows, don't kill cows.
If someone eats beef when it's against the law, don't gang rape them.

Lol!

Too bad the terrorists didnt listen to ur advise

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Am I the only one here who thinks that maybe she should not have eaten the beef? lol

Yes. When it comes to flash mobs they don't let something as inconvenient as the facts get in the way. As the report in the OP says, a 50 year old Muslim man was beaten to death by Hindus last year due to the rumour that he ate beef.

 

[Aupmanyav]

The group of Hindus also beat to death members of the females' family. Link is here. This isn't the first time either. India enacted anti-cow-killing laws to avoid offending the religious sensibilities of Hindus some time ago - and these look set to be strengthened by a Hindu nationalist government.

People say this as if it has been proved. That is the allegation and is being investigated. Also being investigated is the case when seven samples of 'biryani' have been found to contain beef in the same area, which is prohibited by law in that particular state. It is not difficult to blame people in retaliation. Anyone can go to a police station and make an allegation. The government is also trying to contain cow vigilantes. In a previous case when a Muslim man was lynched by a mob, it was found that the family did actually have beef in their refrigerator. The family was showered with money by anti-Hindu state governments and allotted residential apartments in Delhi and Lucknow. This is plain and simple politics. So blaming one party is not fair. Let the police go through their investigation. Do not engage in trial-by-media. Surely, Hindus will not accept cow-slaughter in states where it is legally banned. There are states in India where there is no ban on cow-slaughter. It depends on what the people's representatives decide. There are states where consumption of liquor is banned (Gujarat and Bihar). One needs to follow whatever is the law at that place. As for BBC, Christian and Muslim sites, they are delighted to hear and spread such news from India. They are not at all relevant to India.

 

[Godobeyer]

Don't play the "poor, poor pitiful us" card.

Who planted a bomb in the underground garage of the World Trade Center in 1993?
Who destroyed the World Trade Center?
Who bombed the night club in Bali?
Who attacked the USS Cole?
Who bombed the US embassy in Nairobi?

Need I go on?

If remember well both 1993 and also Nairobi US embassy.they accused Bin Laden,in that time.

but so I remember well that Bin Laden his groups was allie to US. so when some of his group could access to USA and trained how to polite planes !! and CIA knew about that, I guess something wrong.

I play justice "card".
I considered Afghanistan was indirect war between USA and Soviet Union(Russia now),so Muslim invited in. so also same (indirect war between USA and Russia) Iraq and Syria and Libya.

 

[Godobeyer]

I would like to think if I was Muslim that I would not have to jump at every little thing to make me a martyr.

But then, that's just me.

EDITED to add:
Believe or not ,IF you were Muslim, most of Muslims believe/act as you do.

anyway,I was talking about media switch label.

 

[FearGod]

The group of Hindus also beat to death members of the females' family. Link is here. This isn't the first time either. India enacted anti-cow-killing laws to avoid offending the religious sensibilities of Hindus some time ago - and these look set to be strengthened by a Hindu nationalist government.

This is absolutely appalling behaviour. Nobody should be treated in such a cruel way and nobody should ever be subject to dietary restrictions or degrading, discriminating treatment based on a belief system they don't subscribe to.

I hope the perpetrators get jailed for life!!

This is maybe the first thread ever to show the ugliness of some aspects in Hinduism and Hindus as we
were used to see many threads against Islam or anti Islam, call for a change.

 

[FearGod]

It is not terrorism when it is domestic. We do not call beheadings in Saudi Arabia terrorism either.

Beheading the criminals, how that is compared to rape, kill and eat the innocents.

 

[FearGod]

ISIS has an organized agenda. Their targets are not an action, but ideologies not in line with their own. Their attacks are planned. If Hindus begin to regularly seek out Muslims and target them with surprise attacks for their different beliefs and habits, then that will be terrorism.

Now the thread is shifting that Hindus aren't terrorists but Muslims are,
I didn't expect that the thread will turn to anti Islam that fast.

 

[Aupmanyav]

No, there are some Hindus who have taken upon themselves to enforce the law against beef. Prime Minister Modi has warned these people. A few such people have been arrested in Punjab and Haryana. Actually these people were extortionists. They would allow beef to pass if they were adequately paid.

This is not the job of citizens to enforce law. Only the authorized department should collect the samples. If any Hindu suspects that beef is being consumed or transported, then the right thing to do is to inform police or the concerned food department. After that, the job belongs to them or to the judiciary when a case is put up. India is a law-abiding country and we do not want anarchists.

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Now the thread is shifting that Hindus aren't terrorists but Muslims are,
I didn't expect that the thread will turn to anti Islam that fast.

Hold on a sec. I thought Islamic State militants weren't true Muslims, and that what they did runs counter to how Islam should be practiced?

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Beheading the criminals, how that is compared to rape, kill and eat the innocents.

Well for starters, beheading is killing. And what's this about eating the victims i.e. innocents?

 

[LuisDantas]

Beheading the criminals, how that is compared to rape, kill and eat the innocents.

Actually, that is a very useful question.

 

[FearGod]

Hold on a sec. I thought Islamic State militants weren't true Muslims, and that what they did runs counter to how Islam should be practiced?

But when they speak, then they speak about Islam and not the hypocrites(ISIS).
they say Muslims, Muslim terrorist..etc

 

[FearGod]

Well for starters, beheading is killing. And what's this about eating the victims i.e. innocents?

Sorry i meant beaten the innocents to death, they didn't do a crime by eating beef,
that can't be compared to beheading the criminals in Saudi Arabia,IOW no one
can be beheaded in Saudi Arabia for eating pork or drinking wine.

 

[atanu]

The group of Hindus also beat to death members of the females' family. Link is here. This isn't the first time either. India enacted anti-cow-killing laws to avoid offending the religious sensibilities of Hindus some time ago - and these look set to be strengthened by a Hindu nationalist government.

This is absolutely appalling behaviour. Nobody should be treated in such a cruel way and nobody should ever be subject to dietary restrictions or degrading, discriminating treatment based on a belief system they don't subscribe to.

I hope the perpetrators get jailed for life!!

I am no supporter of the elements of society who impose their parochial ideas on common people in the name of religion and especially those who impose their idea of Hindutva (Hinduism) on others. But, I have faith that, in India, the criminals will get appropriate penalty. India is home to all religions of the world and Hinduism has withstood the onslaught of both the covert missionary activity as well as overt Muslim aggression through ages. Still the country has held up the liberalism of multiculturalism and multi-religion.

Furthermore, in which society of world there is no aberration? In which country the intolerance has not reared its ugly head? In India, majority, including the PM, do not support aggressive actions of antisocial elements who take law into their hands. Compare that with countries that support, in overt and covert ways, terrorism in other countries.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/repor...igilantes-gau-raksha-dal-chief-booked-2242417
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...u-rakshaks-by-day-PM/articleshow/53579893.cms
http://photogallery.indiatimes.com/...s-are-anti-social-pm/articleshow/53581376.cms

 

[McBell]

EDITED to add:
Believe or not ,IF you were Muslim, most of Muslims believe/act as you do.

anyway,I was talking about media switch label.

I happen to know quite a few Muslims.
There are two Mosques within 20 miles of my home.
and I agree, they do not try to make themselves into martyrs every chance they get.
However, as this thread has pointed out, there are those Muslims who try to make themselves martyrs every chance they get.

In fact, one or two of them can be seen doing just that in every thread Icehorse creates....

 

[Godobeyer]

and I agree, they do not try to make themselves into martyrs every chance they get.
However, as this thread has pointed out, there are those Muslims who try to make themselves martyrs every chance they get.

So it's about chance then lol !!

In fact, one or two of them can be seen doing just that in every thread Icehorse creates....

For my experience with @icehorse for almost than 3 years,MOST of his threads/posts were just around anti-Islam or anti-Muslims,and by generazling method of course.

For that reason, we generally can't satisfy every person in the world,especially when he behaves like your "ANTI" all time.

 

[Jainarayan]

I considered Afghanistan was indirect war between USA and Soviet Union(Russia now),so Muslim invited in. so also same (indirect war between USA and Russia) Iraq and Syria and Libya.

That's your belief, and it may very well be true, but it doesn't change the fact that virtually all suicide (not suicide, homicide) bombings are done by Muslim fundamentalists. For which there is zero justification.

 

[McBell]

For my experience with @icehorse for almost than 3 years,MOST of his threads/posts were just around anti-Islam or anti-Muslims,and by generazling method of course.

For that reason, we generally can't satisfy every person in the world,especially when he behaves like your "ANTI" all time.

You have no control over his actions.
But you do have control over your actions, right?