dust1n
Zindīq
Perhaps I should not have used the word "exploit".
What word should you have used then?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps I should not have used the word "exploit".
What do you mean, "real school?"
Her son looks adorable.
And happy.
Storm has a very good point. Promoting tolerance towards homosexuality, transvestism and/or transexuality is definitely a worthy goal, and one that deserves a few courageous decisions and hardships along the way. Assuming that the school has problems with that, then it is indeed not much of a real school, as Dust1n implied.
On the other hand, regardless of the excellent merits of the cause itself, I also agree with Storm that it is a bit disturbing to see such a young child exposed to the lack of understanding of the world at large. Maybe we are talking about a very well-resolved and (most importantly) well-supported child, and in that case my fears are probably groundless. But we simply can't tell whether that is the case out of a photo and a news article. Children are often pushed towards participation in agendas they can't really understand or sustain. Hopefully this is not the case here, but homophoby being still so widespread as it is, I am fearful for the child for the time being. I have known child transexuals and let me say, we are bound to someday look back to these days and regret our odious intolerance.
Some Halloween costumes are more appropriate than others. Some are less awkward than others.
I don't think it's cool to let young boys dress like girls. When he is old enough to handle his own problems he can dress like whatever he wants.
I saw it as her being pushy and utterly failing to prepare the boy for an inevitable reaction.
Then she went and plastered the story all over the net with the headline "MY SON IS GAY" to show what a wonderful, tolerant, supportive mom she is. I am not impressed.
Then why is it posted on the internet? Why is it titled my five year old son is gay? Why was it her point to say it was nobody's business how she raises her son yet post it on the Internet to make it everyones business? No agenda right?
Found this while surfing the net and thought it worth sharing.
He changed his mind and she made him go in anyway. She didn't even try to prepare him for the consequences, in fact, she contradicted his wholly accurate instincts. Then, as already mentioned, she posted the story online with a totally inappropriate headline thinking it showed what a great mom she is.
And that's HER side of the story!
Wow. Tolerant mom.
Well, it wasn't JUST that. It was everything together. Tomato broke it down a couple of posts up.
The thing is, if you want to be supportive, you have to be supportive when the kid decides he DOESN'T want to do it, too.
Everything about this story screams "political football" to me. Like I said, there are certainly worse agendas, but the whole thing is just distasteful.
I think that self-acceptance is excellent. I just think the phrase "be yourself" is stupid. If "myself" is someone who changes his behavior because others make me feel I should, then that characteristic is part of "myself". You can't be anything other than what you. No matter how hard you try. Even if you act like someone else. You're an actor. You're still you.
I can almost see this particular mom encouraging him to continue cross-dressing just to feed her desire for controversy and self-righteousness.
There's a part where she talks for quite a while, and the psychologist guy is visibly itching to say something the whole time. Interesting. When he finally did say something, it didn't seem like the thing he was itching to say.
I still think her blog title was unnecessarily provocative and a potential source of embarrassment for the kid for years to come, whether he is gay or straight.
What attention? Was this kid made a nationally celebrity? Without look at the article, can you recite to me his name?His mother has gone Perez Hilton on him and exposed him to scrutiny, no kid needs that level of attention.
So she realized the ethical dilemma, made the right choice, and you accuse her of wanting to **** off the parents that her child goes to school with?She either had less realistic expectations than her own 5 year old child, who she admits expressed concerns as the day approached, or she knew there would be a few raised eyebrows and that is exactly what she wanted.
Of course, but it is enough to read her enough opinion to determine that she was actually carrying out a secret agenda, one of political nature, in which she would ultimately come out as a national celebrity and win a "Most Tolerant Mom Of The Year" Award.I would like some more corroboration of the reaction of the other mothers, simply because I hate one sided stories.
I've never suggested anything to anyone. I just said what I think about the situation.But when he is young he can't never dress however he wants? Of course, I didn't see anywhere in the story that the kid had any 'problem' with anybody. Perhaps it is not cool to suggest to a parent what their kid should be allowed to want.
Maybe use the phrase "outed him" like the psychiatrist on the news.What word should you have used then?
Really? How many of his peers do you think made it this his mom's blog?
What attention? Was this kid made a nationally celebrity? Without look at the article, can you recite to me his name?
So she realized the ethical dilemma, made the right choice, and you accuse her of wanting to **** off the parents that her child goes to school with?
Of course, but it is enough to read her enough opinion to determine that she was actually carrying out a secret agenda, one of political nature, in which she would ultimately come out as a national celebrity and win a "Most Tolerant Mom Of The Year" Award.