New scandal:Trump Caught Insulting Women!

[idav]

For some people it is. Its almost as if not everyone is the same.

Its the kind of sentiment that has feminism on a rampage and they are not afraid to call out women on degrading themselves.

 

[idav]

So, you've never seen an R-rated film, much less X? Never heard any other celebrity talk about things they have done with women, and felt they could do with women because of their status? Never....heck let's just deal with the first two (or three).

I've never heard a guy say they would be willing to date their own daughter, thats something trump said. Now I've heard some things in my day but jeez does that man have a mouth.

 

[Acim]

Bill Clinton isn't running for president and we are well aware why he almost got impeached. But yes by all means explore the difference between womanizing and misogynism. It applies to Trump because his words are misogynistic. Are people supposed not vote for Hillary just because her husband is a pig?

Some of his words are misogynistic, just like some of her words are victim shaming nonsense. The "new scandal" is words of a womanizer. Hence, why if we are going to explore it, it would be from that angle.

Bill is not running, but even in the 1990's, it was billed as a 'two for one' thing with Hillary and Bill. Now, that's way more accurate since Bill is still referenced as "President Clinton." If she wins, and they stay married, there will be 2 presidents in the White House, and it would seem highly likely he would be involved in all that she does, though I think understood that she's at the helm.

But main reason to compare Trump stuff to Bill stuff is because none of what's occurring inherently disqualifies Trump from being POTUS. Saying it does is just partisan nonsense or hypocritical BS. Lots of Pubs/conservative types say, often, that Hillary is not qualified, and are usually referencing something scandalous as it relates to her. That's partisan politics. If the Trump scandal erupted and no Dem was saying this disqualifies him, I'd wonder if I was still living in America. The disqualified rhetoric is par for the course.

You're not supposed to vote for Hillary because the magnitude of her lies and manipulation (on policy decisions) is atrocious, her accomplishments negligible and because her demeanor, behind closed doors, has earned her the rightful nickname of the Hildabeast.

 

[Acim]

Oh come on, I mean in this forum from posts but the worst as I said comes from the right conservative not the left, which is odd. Conservatives are supposed to be the puritans. Context would do you wonders.

Oh come on your self. You now specify the meaning when you didn't before. So, even more BS from you? Some conservatives are puritans. Apparently the liberals on this thread are trying to pass themselves off as puritans that can't handle such commentary. Oh my my. I've never! I'm aghast that any male would speak this way. Move away from me now, for I shall faint at just the mere speaking of this language.

 

[Acim]

Now I've heard some things in my day but jeez does that man have a mouth.

Oh my my. Heaven's to betsy.

 

[idav]

Oh my my. Heaven's to betsy.

Great just ignore his words then, suit yourself.

 

[idav]

Oh come on your self. You now specify the meaning when you didn't before. So, even more BS from you? Some conservatives are puritans. Apparently the liberals on this thread are trying to pass themselves off as puritans that can't handle such commentary. Oh my my. I've never! I'm aghast that any male would speak this way. Move away from me now, for I shall faint at just the mere speaking of this language.

I'm not going to get into generalization game with you.

 

[Twilight Hue]

If Trump were a Democrat, his allies would be praising him as very "European" (as Bill was lauded for his assaults & trysts).
I say he's a boor.
But there are far more important considerations in electing a presidential candidate from the current crop.

True.

Look at history.

JFK. Whoo baby!!!

List names by Big Frog.......

• Thomas Jefferson and....
• Warren Harding and......
• Franklin D. Roosevelt and.......
• Dwight D. Eisenhower and.......
• Lyndon B Johnson and. .
• Of course Bill Clinton

Somehow by some freak act of providence it's just now become gawd awful and different with Trump. Totally shocking those who act like they have never come across such indiscretion. Deep breaths folks, deep breaths......

 

[Acim]

Great just ignore his words then, suit yourself.

So for you it's feign BS puritan values or ignore it. That's so integrity based of you.

 

[Acim]

I'm not going to get into generalization game with you.

Thank you for your concession.

 

[idav]

So for you it's feign BS puritan values or ignore it. That's so integrity based of you.

I have no idea what your on about. Your typical strawman tactics no doubt.

 

[idav]

Thank you for your concession.

That by no means makes you a winner except in your own mind. Your using generalization to try and pit Trump with the rest of men. Not going to work. I am tempted to pit him with what conservatives typically think but I believe would be a mistake.

 

[Acim]

I have no idea what your on about. Your typical strawman tactics no doubt.

You don't recall what you said in post #246, or just your typical lying BS posts?

I'm the one tackling the comments head on, and you're the one feigning a BS puritan view. Please keep up.

 

[Acim]

That by no means makes you a winner except in your own mind. Your using generalization to try and pit Trump with the rest of men.

Correct, I'm speaking honestly.

Not going to work.

...for hypocrites.

I am tempted to pit him with what conservatives typically think but I believe would be a mistake.

Only to keep it partisan. Cause that's how BS works in discussions.

 

[idav]

You don't recall what you said in post #246, or just your typical lying BS posts?

I'm the one tackling the comments head on, and you're the one feigning a BS puritan view. Please keep up.

My my someones getting testy. You ignored the comment about someone who said that they would date their daughter. Are you saying you typically hear that sort of talk. It has nothing to do with puritan values.

 

[Acim]

My my someones getting testy. You ignored the comment about someone who said that they would date their daughter. Are you saying you typically hear that sort of talk. It has nothing to do with puritan values.

I ignored it cause a) it's not relevant to the thread (on the new scandal), b) is spun out of context and c) cause I was busy nailing opposition on the points on this thread. You wanna make that what this thread is about, then provide the exact wording he said and ask away. May not respond in this thread, but if you want I'll be sure to PM you so you don't think I'm ignoring it.

 

[idav]

Correct, I'm speaking honestly.



...for hypocrites.



Only to keep it partisan. Cause that's how BS works in discussions.

Speaking honestly or not generalizations are typically wrong which is why they are typically called out as fallacious.

 

[Acim]

Speaking honestly or not generalizations are typically wrong which is why they are typically called out as fallacious.

This assertion is fallacious.

 

[idav]

I ignored it cause a) it's not relevant to the thread (on the new scandal), b) is spun out of context and c) cause I was busy nailing opposition on the points on this thread. You wanna make that what this thread is about, then provide the exact wording he said and ask away. May not respond in this thread, but if you want I'll be sure to PM you so you don't think I'm ignoring it.

That was the progress of the discussion. You were calling me out on "stuff I never heard before" then ignored it when I actually posted something.

 

[idav]

This assertion is fallacious.

Your assertion that all men are misogynist like that of trumps rhetoric is fallacious. You even admitted "some of his comments were misogynistic". You admitted it case closed. Now back to our scheduled program.