• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

New York Times endorses Harris as ‘the only choice’ for president

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
What are her restrictions?
Will you ever just admit that fewer than 1% of all abortions are sought after the 2nd trimester? And that those very few are the result of serious danger for the mother in almost every case?

Because when you admit that (which happens to be the truth), you'll realize that you're screaming about a problem that doesn't exist!
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
She wholeheartedly supports H.R. 3755 the "Women's Health Protection Act of 2021". This act would allow abortions through the ninth month of pregnancy and disallow any state laws restricting abortions. It's stated purpose is to disallow restrictions on abortions.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3755/text
Actually, this bill does allow states to regulate abortion on demand after viability:
quote from bill linked above:

(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.
(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
Shaul’s post debunks this. #34
Did you read the bill? Did you miss this part allowing states to regulate abortion on demand post-viability:

(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.
(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.​
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Why would the border be a top priority?
I actually think the economy is a top priority the border is definitely second according to what I understand about it. The economic impact of bringing in millions and millions of people into this country is undeniable. It's a massive shock to the system.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
When Kamala Harris demonstrates that she has a mind on her own...
well...I will agree.
Yeah I would say good luck with that. Harris if she's elected , will be the least transparent most evasive and probably the only president with the fewest if no interviews, and then state of the union addresses would be most certainly written by somebody else and not her, and it will be highly scripted predetermined and most certainly the question to be screened along with the answers before the broadcast with a fully functioning teleprompter.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Yeah I would say good luck with that. Harris if she's elected , will be the least transparent most evasive and probably the only president with the fewest if no interviews, and then state of the union addresses would be most certainly written by somebody else and not her, and it will be highly scripted predetermined and most certainly the question to be screened along with the answers before the broadcast with a fully functioning teleprompter.
Unfortunately more and more hints make me suspect that it will be His Majesty the Sultan that will govern behind the scenes.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yeah I would say good luck with that. Harris if she's elected , will be the least transparent most evasive and probably the only president with the fewest if no interviews, and then state of the union addresses would be most certainly written by somebody else and not her, and it will be highly scripted predetermined and most certainly the question to be screened along with the answers before the broadcast with a fully functioning teleprompter.
Except that as usual you have it backwards. Trump is the one that has backed out of interviews recently, not Harris. Trump was too afraid to have a second debate since he lost the first one so badly. He would not go on 60 Minutes because they would not give him the questions ahead of time. Harris is the one that has give out some details of her health care that she proposes. Trump only has "concepts of a plan" and he does not tell us what those supposed concepts are.

It is amazing that everything that you complain about Harris supposedly being guilty of Trump is ten times more guilty of doing that.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Except that as usual you have it backwards. Trump is the one that has backed out of interviews recently, not Harris. Trump was too afraid to have a second debate since he lost the first one so badly. He would not go on 60 Minutes because they would not give him the questions ahead of time. Harris is the one that has give out some details of her health care that she proposes. Trump only has "concepts of a plan" and he does not tell us what those supposed concepts are.

It is amazing that everything that you complain about Harris supposedly being guilty of Trump is ten times more guilty of doing that.
Yeah...a person who miraculously survived an attempted murder and still had the courage not to give up the race.

I mean... courage is something very rare these days, among politicians.
The courage to stand up against the élites.

Is there anything that can be vaguely called courage in the Democratic Party? ;)
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Is September 10 recent enough for you?

I am sure she would sign a bill restoring Roe, is that her limits though? Her website says this:

And when Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom nationwide, she will sign it.

What does this mean? Has she defined this? Her administration supported HR 3755 which seems to go further than Roe when you read it.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Will you ever just admit that fewer than 1% of all abortions are sought after the 2nd trimester? And that those very few are the result of serious danger for the mother in almost every case?

Because when you admit that (which happens to be the truth), you'll realize that you're screaming about a problem that doesn't exist!
All I asked is what Kamala's restrictions are. What are they?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Did you read the bill? Did you miss this part allowing states to regulate abortion on demand post-viability:
(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.​
(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.​
Yep, and all they need is a doctor to say the mother's health is at risk. Notice they have risk of health not just her life. Every pregnancy is a risk to the mother's health, how is that defined in the bill?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Except that as usual you have it backwards. Trump is the one that has backed out of interviews recently, not Harris. Trump was too afraid to have a second debate since he lost the first one so badly. He would not go on 60 Minutes because they would not give him the questions ahead of time. Harris is the one that has give out some details of her health care that she proposes. Trump only has "concepts of a plan" and he does not tell us what those supposed concepts are.

It is amazing that everything that you complain about Harris supposedly being guilty of Trump is ten times more guilty of doing that.
Harris has explained nothing to anybody. That's why she is going to be fired in less then two weeks.
 
Top