New York Times endorses Harris as ‘the only choice’ for president

[Subduction Zone]

Where does she say this?

Is September 10 recent enough for you?

WATCH: Harris denounces 'Trump abortion bans,' supports restoring Roe v. Wade

Vice President Kamala Harris accused former President Donald Trump of intentionally nominating three current Supreme Court justices because they would use the bench to undo Roe v. Wade, which protected a woman's constitutional right to abortion.

www.pbs.org

 

[anotherneil]

No it’s not. But my post is about your post, so there’s that.

Huh? My post is apparently unfamiliar with editorials? You're suggesting to my post that it pick up a newspaper, or its online counterpart, sometime? That doesn't make any sense.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

What are her restrictions?

Will you ever just admit that fewer than 1% of all abortions are sought after the 2nd trimester? And that those very few are the result of serious danger for the mother in almost every case?

Because when you admit that (which happens to be the truth), you'll realize that you're screaming about a problem that doesn't exist!

 

[Watchmen]

Shaul’s post debunks this. #34


I never made this claim.

Nope. That was three years ago and you provided no evidence she actually supports this and it’s inconsistent with what she says as a candidate.

I guess you’re running away now.

 

[crossfire]

She wholeheartedly supports H.R. 3755 the "Women's Health Protection Act of 2021". This act would allow abortions through the ninth month of pregnancy and disallow any state laws restricting abortions. It's stated purpose is to disallow restrictions on abortions.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3755/text

Actually, this bill does allow states to regulate abortion on demand after viability:
quote from bill linked above:

(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.
(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.
​

 

[crossfire]

Shaul’s post debunks this. #34

Did you read the bill? Did you miss this part allowing states to regulate abortion on demand post-viability:

(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.
(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.​

 

[Estro Felino]

When Kamala Harris demonstrates that she has a mind on her own...
well...I will agree.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Why would the border be a top priority?

I actually think the economy is a top priority the border is definitely second according to what I understand about it. The economic impact of bringing in millions and millions of people into this country is undeniable. It's a massive shock to the system.

 

[Twilight Hue]

When Kamala Harris demonstrates that she has a mind on her own...
well...I will agree.

Yeah I would say good luck with that. Harris if she's elected , will be the least transparent most evasive and probably the only president with the fewest if no interviews, and then state of the union addresses would be most certainly written by somebody else and not her, and it will be highly scripted predetermined and most certainly the question to be screened along with the answers before the broadcast with a fully functioning teleprompter.

 

[Estro Felino]

Yeah I would say good luck with that. Harris if she's elected , will be the least transparent most evasive and probably the only president with the fewest if no interviews, and then state of the union addresses would be most certainly written by somebody else and not her, and it will be highly scripted predetermined and most certainly the question to be screened along with the answers before the broadcast with a fully functioning teleprompter.

Unfortunately more and more hints make me suspect that it will be His Majesty the Sultan that will govern behind the scenes.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yeah I would say good luck with that. Harris if she's elected , will be the least transparent most evasive and probably the only president with the fewest if no interviews, and then state of the union addresses would be most certainly written by somebody else and not her, and it will be highly scripted predetermined and most certainly the question to be screened along with the answers before the broadcast with a fully functioning teleprompter.

Except that as usual you have it backwards. Trump is the one that has backed out of interviews recently, not Harris. Trump was too afraid to have a second debate since he lost the first one so badly. He would not go on 60 Minutes because they would not give him the questions ahead of time. Harris is the one that has give out some details of her health care that she proposes. Trump only has "concepts of a plan" and he does not tell us what those supposed concepts are.

It is amazing that everything that you complain about Harris supposedly being guilty of Trump is ten times more guilty of doing that.

 

[Estro Felino]

Except that as usual you have it backwards. Trump is the one that has backed out of interviews recently, not Harris. Trump was too afraid to have a second debate since he lost the first one so badly. He would not go on 60 Minutes because they would not give him the questions ahead of time. Harris is the one that has give out some details of her health care that she proposes. Trump only has "concepts of a plan" and he does not tell us what those supposed concepts are.

It is amazing that everything that you complain about Harris supposedly being guilty of Trump is ten times more guilty of doing that.

Yeah...a person who miraculously survived an attempted murder and still had the courage not to give up the race.

I mean... courage is something very rare these days, among politicians.
The courage to stand up against the élites.

Is there anything that can be vaguely called courage in the Democratic Party?

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Is September 10 recent enough for you?

WATCH: Harris denounces 'Trump abortion bans,' supports restoring Roe v. Wade

Vice President Kamala Harris accused former President Donald Trump of intentionally nominating three current Supreme Court justices because they would use the bench to undo Roe v. Wade, which protected a woman's constitutional right to abortion.

www.pbs.org

I am sure she would sign a bill restoring Roe, is that her limits though? Her website says this:

And when Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom nationwide, she will sign it.

What does this mean? Has she defined this? Her administration supported HR 3755 which seems to go further than Roe when you read it.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Will you ever just admit that fewer than 1% of all abortions are sought after the 2nd trimester? And that those very few are the result of serious danger for the mother in almost every case?

Because when you admit that (which happens to be the truth), you'll realize that you're screaming about a problem that doesn't exist!

All I asked is what Kamala's restrictions are. What are they?

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Nope. That was three years ago and you provided no evidence she actually supports this and it’s inconsistent with what she says as a candidate.

So what has she said as a candidate? Can you show me a transcript or video with her restrictions?

I guess you’re running away now.

Nope, I never made the claim. Show me where I made this claim?

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Did you read the bill? Did you miss this part allowing states to regulate abortion on demand post-viability:

​

(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability, including a prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion procedure.​

(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.​

Yep, and all they need is a doctor to say the mother's health is at risk. Notice they have risk of health not just her life. Every pregnancy is a risk to the mother's health, how is that defined in the bill?

 

[fantome profane]

Yep, and all they need is a doctor to say the mother's health is at risk.

You would rather they get a politician or a lawyer to make that assessment?

 

[Twilight Hue]

Except that as usual you have it backwards. Trump is the one that has backed out of interviews recently, not Harris. Trump was too afraid to have a second debate since he lost the first one so badly. He would not go on 60 Minutes because they would not give him the questions ahead of time. Harris is the one that has give out some details of her health care that she proposes. Trump only has "concepts of a plan" and he does not tell us what those supposed concepts are.

It is amazing that everything that you complain about Harris supposedly being guilty of Trump is ten times more guilty of doing that.

Harris has explained nothing to anybody. That's why she is going to be fired in less then two weeks.

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

Their loss.

They may lose a few subscribers. But I suspect that most who find themselves still committed to a disgusting fascist are unlikely to read, much less subscribe to, an ethical news source.

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

Your last comment was rude.

Some might find the irony of a Trump-enabler whining about "rude' to be a bit detached from reality.