I would want better guidelines for doctors to follow. They should define what health risk means.
They do, but they don't need to define it for you. What you want is to monitor their decisions. You don't require physicians to specify the health risks with diabetes or alcohol consumption because you understand that those are of interest to physicians and their patients, but not to you. You don't care what physicians consider to be too high a glucose until it affects you personally, and if that happened to you or a loved one, you wouldn't want government supervising that process. You would resent some buttinsky with zero medical knowledge who thinks that what you and your physician decide is his business and needs to be supervised to meet his approval.
But you want to know that doctor's standards and want them stated explicitly as if you should have any say about what goes on in the exam room.
Conservatives used to bemoan nanny statism, but now, they lead the charge. They want to dictate who can say gay, what books can be read, who can have what gender related medical procedure, who can marry whom, and who can get an abortion. None of it is your business, but your religion teaches you that it is.
Surely there should be a definition of what a health risk means before we end a life.
There is, but you don't need to know what it is. It's none of your business. You're not qualified to have an opinion on what physicians decide, and you have no legitimate role in such decision-making. If some physicians don't meet the medical community's standards, it will discipline them - not you or the government acting on behalf of the church
I have always said and Trump has said as well that is the mother's life is at risk then it is up to the mother to decide what to do.
Don't believe Trump when he seems to show concern for somebody other than himself. Trump is a liar without compunction.
you believe Trump when he says he does not want a national abortion ban?
Trump doesn't have any opinion of his own in that regard. He says what others tell him is helpful to him to say. Right now, he's gaslighting women trying to deceive them into thinking that he might protect them. He won't. Nothing wrong with abortion for health risks.
Abortion for convenience is what I don't like. It has nothing to do with 'because of health risks'.
That's fine, but if you mean to impose those preferences on others, then you are part of this same problem of people thinking that they should have control over the decisions pregnant women and their doctors make.
What % of abortions are done for health risks vs done for convenience?
You seem to think that that's your business. Why else would you care except that you have some threshold that is unacceptable to you. Even if every abortion were performed to prevent a normal but unwanted pregnancy,
that's none of your business.
Edit: I see that
@SkepticThinker beat me to it.
People hire illegals because of they are far cheaper than hiring citizens living there , so what happens to Citizens wages then when it's much cheaper to get illegal labor? Ever stop to think of that?
So now you're representing that you are interested in paying more for produce (for example) to protect your neighbors' wages? Judging by your repeated lamentations about prices, it sounds like you need prices to be as low as they can be. Migrant labor keeps your prices lower.
Harris has to do better than that other than giving out word salad
That what well-educated and decent people embrace as an intelligent and compassionate platform is only jibber-jabber to you is not something to keep proclaiming. It's not understood as you seem to think.
You're like the creationists commenting on scientific proclamations who say that they just don't see how the science can be correct. That, too, is not a reflection on the quality of the science, but rather, on the person who can't understand it.
