Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sure, but how about doing so without also commemorating perpetrators of genocide?So we're not allowed to celebrate coming here for a better life?
Is it a bad thing to remember?Sure, but how about doing so without also commemorating perpetrators of genocide?
Yeah I agree probably not to use his name but maybe we should. Maybe we should be reminded of the sickoSure, but how about doing so without also commemorating perpetrators of genocide?
Last Sunday, I was talking to a few of my friends, and mentioned stuff that happened over a previous Columbus Day Weekend. Someone "corrected" me, saying it is "Indigenous Persons Day." I snapped at him, saying, "I am sick and tired of being told we're bad people, that we don't belong here." I feel that there have been many movement of peoples around the earth, and the primitive people almost always lose the argument.
I also feel that smallpox, diphtheria and typhoid, originally spread by de Soto's horses left being, deserve a large share of the blame. The book 1491: The Americas Before Columbus by Charles C. Mann posits that horses and rats were that vector and suggests that much of North America's Native American population was reduced by 90% to 98% by the spread of those diseases. In other words the migrant European population found far fewer Native Americans than had existed half a century before. If the native population was dense enough to have the famous major Aztec, Mayan and Inca cities and in the Midwest cities such as Cahokia, there was enough population to support transmission of highly contagious diseases.
It's a given that Africa and Asia largely held European invaders at bay; the Americas' and Australia's did not. European presence and penetration in Africa and Asia, on the same landmass, was quite minor, like likely because the population was dense and its leadership relatively intact. Smallpox, diphtheria and typhoid raced through the native populations in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand. In addition to the numbers killed, their leadership was decapitated, resulting in disorganization. I would like the shamers of relatively advanced Europeans to at least be honest.
We have the right to be here, and we are imperfect, but good. The Aztecs and Mayas were nothing to write home about.
Of course, but remembering isn't the same as celebrating.Yeah I agree probably not to use his name but maybe we should. Maybe we should be reminded of the sicko
Any other man in his position would’ve done the same thing. Mostly all the men were evil back thenPandoras box has been opened and it's too late to try and hide what was exposed for all to see. Christopher Columbus was an evil man. It's time to relegate this man to history books and the time has definitely come to stop heaping undue praise on his name
Then why are we calling it indigenous peoples day after what we did to them? WeirdOf course, but remembering isn't the same as celebrating.
In honor of all who were harmed, I believe.Then why are we calling it indigenous peoples day after what we did to them? Weird
Any other man in his position would’ve done the same thing. Mostly all the men were evil back then
Then why are we calling it indigenous peoples day after what we did to them? WeirdOf course, but remembering isn't the same as celebrating.
Part of me thinks we should still keep it Columbus Day and teach children what he did the bad things he did and celebrate the good things about us coming here for a better life and to also celebrate the Native Americans and the good things that we did with them. I don’t think we have to hide from his name. Eh either way. There’s other days like indigenous peoples day we remember the bad that we did, Black History Month we remember the bad things about slavery or 9/11 remembrance day we remember the bad. we can have Columbus Day and remember the bad can’t we? Or is his name the reason why? is it someone’s name that gets under people skin and makes it more personal? Probably not. I mean who do you think about on 9/11? Anyone bad?Of course, but remembering isn't the same as celebrating.
Because it's celebrating the people and their culture rather than celebrating a man who committed terrible wrongs against their ancestors.Then why are we calling it indigenous peoples day after what we did to them? Weird
We didn't starting colonizing The Americas until 100 years after Columbus. There are already holidays that are more relevant in that regard, like Thanksgiving and such. And again, nobody is suggesting that Columbus be scrubbed from history; remembering =/= commemorating.Part of me thinks we should still keep it Columbus Day and teach children what he did the bad things he did and celebrate the good things about us coming here for a better life and to also celebrate the Native Americans and the good things that we did with them. I don’t think we have to hide from his name. Eh either way. There’s other days like indigenous peoples day we remember the bad that we did, Black History Month we remember the bad things about slavery or 9/11 remembrance day we remember the bad. we can have Columbus Day and remember the bad can’t we? Or is his name the reason why? is it someone’s name that gets under people skin and makes it more personal?
Commemorating is rememberingWe didn't starting colonizing The Americas until 100 years after Columbus. There are already holidays that are more relevant in that regard, like Thanksgiving and such. And again, nobody is suggesting that Columbus be scrubbed from history; remembering =/= commemorating.