But it has. Did you miss the investigations -- or were they not mentioned on Fox News?I have no doubt the mainstream media will be right on it, as will congress.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But it has. Did you miss the investigations -- or were they not mentioned on Fox News?I have no doubt the mainstream media will be right on it, as will congress.
Voter fraud is a high risk, low benefit crime, thus, rare.Of course. We are talking about human beings here.
Fraud is a givin. Not an exception.
I don't think Ken read the article very carefully, or failed to understand it.You don't have proof of that. It's a Trump county, odds are a republican fraudster.
There were no ballots involved, the lady was sending in voter registration requests for people at the senior home.
Key word, "Registration". No votes, no Bidens or Trump. Registration.
There were ZERO voting attempts! Read the article!One incident of 67 voting attempts. How many did we not catch?
Generally speaking, so many people say that fraud isn't prevalent... as if in the United States there is nothing but saints all over doing great things.
Texas Social Worker Charged With 134 Counts Involving Election Fraud -
Texas Social Worker Charged With 134 Counts Involving Election Fraud
"Brunner allegedly submitted voter registration applications for 67 residents without their signature or effective consent, while purporting to act as their agent."
She was a Democrat but there are Republican fraudsters too
Republican Pleads Guilty To Attempted Election Fraud With Mail In Ballots
Do you think fraud is more prevalent than we think?
I wonder why.Yes... you have been on that road for some time now.
But it has. Did you miss the investigations -- or were they not mentioned on Fox News?
Because she was caught....There were ZERO voting attempts! Read the article!
What fraud do you think was attempted?
Can I say both 'yes' and 'no'?
Voter fraud exists everywhere. Whilst I think some naively don't believe this to be so, I also think it's important to separate individual instances of fraud with systemic fraud, or election rigging.
So yes, voter fraud is more common than some think. But I don't think the US elections are being impacted holistically by domestic voter fraud based on my best assessment of evidence.
Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database | The Heritage FoundationCan I say both 'yes' and 'no'?
Voter fraud exists everywhere. Whilst I think some naively don't believe this to be so, I also think it's important to separate individual instances of fraud with systemic fraud, or election rigging.
So yes, voter fraud is more common than some think. But I don't think the US elections are being impacted holistically by domestic voter fraud based on my best assessment of evidence.
Not understanding what I am saying? Personal bias? Voted for Biden? Combination? Other reason?I wonder why.
Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database | The Heritage Foundation
Note that The Heritage Foundation is a conservative think tank.
Big risk for no reward. Quite unlike gerrymandering, caging, registration purges, &c.
Thanks. I appreciate an informative, well reasoned response.
Yes -- according to the article. I can't figure out why anyone would be charged for requesting an application for anything.Because she was caught....
How many counts were placed against her? Is it because she didn't commit voting fraud?
Because she violated the law on WHO can ask for it. Some weren't even, mentally, be able to ask for it -- the law stating that such people cannot vote.Thanks. I appreciate an informative, well reasoned response.
Now go google
Yes -- according to the article. I can't figure out why anyone would be charged for requesting an application for anything.
Can you explain it to me?
All she did was request applications for registration, Ie: she asked for some registration forms to be sent her. Why this should be illegal is beyond me.
Anyone can walk into an Election Administration office and pick up a dozen actual applications. What possible harm can be done with an application -- much less a mere request for one?
You can walk into a Wall Mart and get an application for a hunting license. You can walk into the DMV and walk out with an application for a driver's license. You can walk into any office and get applications for whatever you want to do.
It's what I have always seen as Christian hypocrisy. It's why I left the church, while I was still a conservative...Not understanding what I am saying? Personal bias? Voted for Biden? Combination? Other reason?
A lot of these cases are unintentional, like an X-felon who's been legally voting in one state moving to a state where a conviction renders voting illegal, or that recent scheme in Florida to suddenly cancel the previously legal registrations of X-felons who hadn't yet paid their full fines, court costs, &c. Florida moves to remove felons with unpaid debts from voting rolls - CNNPoliticsThanks for the link. Yep, aware of The Heritage Foundation, and appreciate the use of conservative links. I often do the same to try and ensure I'm at least hearing both 'sides' of a story, or checking for balance.
I've had a quick hunt through of that, and couple of quick comments;
1) Great resource. Well organised and clear.
2) It kinda supports what I've read elsewhere. Of course there is electoral fraud occurring in all elections. But there does not appear to be systemic, organised fraud. Just stupid people making stupid decisions, for the most part.
3) Vigilance on this stuff is really important, and there are a bunch of changes I would personally make to the US system in the interests of not waiting until something happens to take action. The main issue with 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' is that you are guaranteeing yourself a broken wagon at some point. Some of the changes I'd think are sensible, though, would be problematic in the US for both cultural and constitutional reasons.
Is there such a law? Had all the clients been declared legally incompetent? Was she aware of it?Because she violated the law on WHO can ask for it. Some weren't even, mentally, be able to ask for it -- the law stating that such people cannot vote.
As per the site:Is there such a law? Had all the clients been declared legally incompetent? Was she aware of it?
I saw nothing in the article about any of this.
Why would it be illegal to request applications, though? No-one had actually submitted any applications, and even if they had, what are the applications for, anyway, if not to weed out those unqualified?