SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
You should start by writing a sentence that makes sense.Why? It's obvious like humans are superior to animals. Must we state the obvious?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You should start by writing a sentence that makes sense.Why? It's obvious like humans are superior to animals. Must we state the obvious?
They can't pretend and don't record in people's heads. They arent offended , except in peoples heads. You apply your beliefs onto animals. There is nothing wrong with that if you recognize it for what it is. The think dogs actually get offended is delusional.I'm judging that based on what you've said in your posts here, obviously. You don't think dogs can pretend. That's incorrect. You don't think dogs can love. That's inaccurate. You don't think dogs can feel shame. That's inaccurate too.
Everything you've claimed about dogs has been inaccurate thus far. What else am I to conclude from that?
Humans are animals.
And you havent offered one piece of evidence showing otherwise.You should start by writing a sentence that makes sense.
Thanks are superior to animals. Offer anything that even remotely suggest otherwise.
Claims not in evidence.They can't pretend and don't record in people's heads. They arent offended , except in peoples heads. You apply your beliefs onto animals. There is nothing wrong with that if you recognize it for what it is. The think dogs actually get offended is delusional.
It's.clear humans are superior to animals. The only thing preventing you from acknowledging that fact is some misguided desire to be one with the universe apparently. That or you dont want to offend your dog. I hope he doesn't read this.That is not an observation. It is a subjective opinion by you. You really don't understand how this part of the world works. How does superrior look like? What is its color, form and so on? You do know how describe something you are looking at, right. Then describe what you see when you look at superior?
This is fun. Tell me how you know when your dog is offended? If he read my quote, that humans are superior to animals what do you suppose his response would be? Send me his email address. I could talk directly to him right?Claims not in evidence.
It's.clear humans are superior to animals. The only thing preventing you from acknowledging that fact is some misguided desire to be one with the universe apparently. That or you dont want to offend your dog. I hope he doesn't read this.
Sure in have. There are over 40 pages on this thread for you to find them. Nothing suggest that saying it to you again would make a difference.Well, you still haven't answered what it is you observe as per superior.
Sure in have. There are over 40 pages on this thread for you to find them. Nothing suggest that saying it to you again would make a difference.
I cant make you see what you can't see.No, not one observation. Just how you reason, think and/or feel.
So no, you claim it, but you have never explained what such an observation is.
I cant make you see what you can't see.
Fact remains grass is green and humans are superior to animals. I seems that fact really upsets you but I have no remedy for that.
Once again over 40 pages for you to review to satisfy your inquiry. You should respond only after you read them.Well, again. What is the form, color and so on of superior? A fact is based on an observation, so what is the actual observation in regards to superior.
How about mammals, which are the examples we were giving. You know, animals that have similar brain structures to ours.
I don't know why you switched off to ants.
For anyone who hasn't read the last 35 or so pages of the thread, here's a recap to save you some time...
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
"Humans are superior to animals."
"No they are not, and this is why. Here's some evidence to support this."
You're welcome.
Okay, let's try this one last time.Fact remains grass is green and humans are superior to animals.
It's a fact humans are better than and superior to animals. The only reason to deny that fact is some misguided woke ideology that no one is better than anyone or in this case anything else. It's nonsensical.Okay, let's try this one last time.
Timmy has an apple.
Sally has an orange.
Timmy says "My apple is green".
Sally says "Oranges are better than apples".
Of the two underlined statements, one is a statement of FACT and the other is a statement of OPINION.
Which is which?
Hmm, the question sadly did not work. Perhaps he knows that Timmy is color blind.Okay, let's try this one last time.
Timmy has an apple.
Sally has an orange.
Timmy says "My apple is green".
Sally says "Oranges are better than apples".
Of the two underlined statements, one is a statement of FACT and the other is a statement of OPINION.
Which is which?
Great logic. There is no possible refutation. Well done.It's a fact humans are better than and superior to animals.
Ah, yes, of course. It's "woke" to understand the difference between stating an opinion and stating a fact.The only reason to deny that fact is some misguided woke ideology that no one is better than anyone or in this case anything else. It's nonsensical.
And that Sally was actually referring to oranges as a better source of vitamin C than apples. It was a trick question all along!Hmm, the question sadly did not work. Perhaps he knows that Timmy is color blind.