Noah's ark...

[We Never Know]

Water does escape earths atmosphere.

Huh?? You just said...

Potentially is not actually. The science tells us that the stratosphere is to cold for water vapour to even exist, hence the reason water exists on earth at all. If water escaped the stratosphere then over 4.4 billion years we would be living [sic] in a desert world.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Yet it is still potentially

That is in practice utterly meaningless. It is potentially so that there is a hidden variable in the structure of the universe so it stops to function as it do now and we all die in 25 seconds. Now start living that, because it is potentially so. But you don't live like that. You assume that the universe is in a sense consistent. That consistency also apply to your "Yet it is still potentially".

 

[We Never Know]

That is in practice utterly meaningless. It is potentially so that there is a hidden variable in the structure of the universe so it stops to function as it do now and we all die in 25 seconds. Now start living that, because it is potentially so. But you don't live like that. You assume that the universe is in a sense consistent. That consistency also apply to your "Yet it is still potentially".

Ok

 

[ChristineM]

Huh?? You just said...

Sorry, typo, water doesn't escape earths atmosphere

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Ok

Do you understand what methodological naturalism is and how it connects to science?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Ok

If you in effect assume that the universe is consistent, then learn when that applies in general. Or you make an incoherent claim in the end.

 

[We Never Know]

Well, it is potentially true that you are a Boltzmann Brain variation, therefore it is so, that you should act like that. That is the absurdity of you playing potentially.

Is it more or less? You know everything so answer the question ..

One hypothesis says... But is it more or less? I don't know. Do you?

"The Earth has lost a quarter of its water"

UCSB Science Line

 

[We Never Know]

Do you understand what methodological naturalism is and how it connects to science?

Ok

 

[We Never Know]

If you in effect assume that the universe is consistent, then learn when that applies in general. Or you make an incoherent claim in the end.

Ok

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Is it more or less? You know everything so answer the question ..

It is unknown, but potentially so with some assumptions about the universe. See, I am a skeptic and can answer as such.

 

[We Never Know]

It is unknown, but potentially so with some assumptions about the universe. See, I am a skeptic and can answer as such.

"but potentially"

So you agree with what I already said..Then why are you spinning?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

"but potentially"

So you agree with what I already said..Then why are you spinning?

You are doing one kind of game. I am doing another. Film at 11.

 

[We Never Know]

You are doing one kind of game. I am doing another. Film at 11.

Ok. Make sure you edit it so you know

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Ok. Make sure you edit it so you know

 

[We Never Know]

Free your mind and the rest will follow

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Free your mind and the rest will follow
...

Well, I do think you and I do that differently.

 

[paradox]

It's not the impossible to build at that time ship, its the total lack of evidence for a world wide flood of the magnitude described

the word "world" for ancient people meant entire place where they lived.
places that were beyond were often described as inhabited by evil spirits so most didn't dare to go beyond.

nobody was aware of the entire earth or how big the world is.
therefore that flood is more likely to apply for the ancient meaning of the "world"

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

the word "world" for ancient people meant entire place where they lived.
places that were beyond were often described as inhabited by evil spirits so most didn't dare to go beyond.

nobody was aware of the entire earth or how big the world is.
therefore that flood is more likely to apply for the ancient meaning of the "world"

So that could also be the case of the Garden of Eden? It is not about the world, but the "world".

 

[danieldemol]

One hypothesis says... But is it more or less? I don't know. Do you?

"The Earth has lost a quarter of its water"

UCSB Science Line

Your quote doesn't seem to appear on the page you linked to, I just did a computer search for "quarter" and nothing came up.

In my opinion

 

[paradox]

So that could also be the case of the Garden of Eden? It is not about the world, but the "world".

Possibly but I think not, because garden of Eden is described as occupying portion of the land, ie. Adam and Eve were cast out to the east of a garden, therefore the world was bigger than just a garden.