GoodbyeDave
Well-Known Member
As at least one person has pointed out, we need to distinguish between financing health care and providing health care.
1. The UK and the Scandinavians have public insurance and care provided by a nationalised industry.
2. France has public insurance and private provision.
3. Germany and the USA have private insurance and care provision.
Note that the last category has one system notorious for the number of people who are failed, and one that is greatly admired! The secret would seem to be the details, not the overall system. Similarly, the NHS in Britain has lower standards than its counterparts in Scandinavia. The problem there seems to be that the NHS is lust too large to be manageable and doesn't get enough funding.
Personally, I'm not an admirer of the NHS. Normally I'd use a private hospital (3 times) but I was admitted once as an emergency to an NHS one. The contrast was stark! I just wish one of the private hospitals in London had an emergency department.
1. The UK and the Scandinavians have public insurance and care provided by a nationalised industry.
2. France has public insurance and private provision.
3. Germany and the USA have private insurance and care provision.
Note that the last category has one system notorious for the number of people who are failed, and one that is greatly admired! The secret would seem to be the details, not the overall system. Similarly, the NHS in Britain has lower standards than its counterparts in Scandinavia. The problem there seems to be that the NHS is lust too large to be manageable and doesn't get enough funding.
Personally, I'm not an admirer of the NHS. Normally I'd use a private hospital (3 times) but I was admitted once as an emergency to an NHS one. The contrast was stark! I just wish one of the private hospitals in London had an emergency department.