mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, yes, I have because you have explained your reasoning in several posts. So unless you lie, the rest of us can understand how you think.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Non-Binary
- Thread starter Kfox
- Start date
Well, yes, I have because you have explained your reasoning in several posts. So unless you lie, the rest of us can understand how you think.
Audie
Veteran Member
Why aren't they rich, all these remote- readers of minds?
Last edited:
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, nothing can be made of how other people think based on what they write/say.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I don't know. People invent stuff all the time to describe themselves.
I'm fairly confident the terms today will become something completely different tomorrow.
Want an answer? My answer is the self descriptions that are being used now will become obsolete sometime in the future.
Audie
Veteran Member
" lassed" is a inadvertant mistypo for
" classed" but seems to fit.
Audie
Veteran Member
And middle age workadaddys and fat wives
who won't want to be reminded of when they insisted on being referred to as "they", any ore than some retirees
want photos of them in bellbottoms and long hair
to be shown about.
Okay so you say I believe my way of thinking is not thinking, but just right. and someone else’s way of thinking is wrong because it is just thinking thus I feel justified in disregarding what they say. Is that correct in your accusations of me?
I have no idea how you’ve concluded I don’t think my way of thinking is not thinking, but I do believe my views are better than all others that might differ. However if I do find another view that is superior to mine, I will adopt this new view as my own and dismiss my previous view that I found to be inferior. I believe everybody should be this way; it would be foolish to hang on to your views even though you find them inferior to other views.
What I don’t do is just dismiss someone else’s views that I disagree with. What I do is I explain why I disagree with them. If you don’t think I do this, I would challenge you to point to a conversation where I’ve just dismissed an opposing view without explain why I’ve dismissed it. There has been times where I’ve agreed to disagree with someone; but I recognize they have just as much of a right to their views as I have to mine.
How about if you start by listing some gender roles that exist today, so I can know what you are talking about
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
First of, you are right about the thinking part in a sense and I were wrong.
Well, the problem is the superior and inferior are not even thinking, because it is in the an non-cognitive evaluation of what matters to you or someone else.
And that is what I should have focussed on. None of these 2 words have any objective referent nor are they about emprical differences nor even truth in that sense.
The end is that you use emotions to do this in part just like the rest of us. You just have different ones than some of us, when it comes to how we ought to live as humans beyound that which is objective.
So yes, you have a point, It is not really about how you or I think. It is that we don't just do that all the time. And that is the point, we all use more than thinking in how we ought to live as humans.
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
Do those things require people should socially advertise their biology in this way? Like genitals, bone density and lung capacity are irrelevant to people existing in their everyday life. It may be relevant in contexts such as a doctor's office, the bedroom, or maybe in some places like sports, but why in the world should people generally care if a person has a penis, low bone density, Xy genetics, a particular balance of androgens, or a certain grip strength?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
You already know what they are. I'm not playing that game wherever person plays like they are dumb and stupid about it.
Audie
Veteran Member
See ifn you can figure why some
people long since were sent to ig city.
I don't think most people outside the medical community really care about those things, what I see most complaints coming from is when they are told they have to pretend as if a biological male can become a woman based strictly on what goes on inside of his head. That's what I hear most of the objections coming from.
No; I'm convinced gender roles have pretty much been obliterated in today's society.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Definitely. It's pretty sureal these days like stepping into another dimension and wondering if this is another planet.
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
I think the idea of gender roles of the past are seen as sexist by today's standards and we have done just about all that is necessary to get rid of them. This idea that only some jobs are for women, and other jobs are for men only; the idea that certain activities are for men only, not women; these ideas are seen as prehistoric sexist ideas that have long been obliterated; and rightly so.
The people who demand "preferred pronoun" usage, and jobs and institutions that enforce it.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Then why do we still have so many of them? Why are they still a norm?
Sex is what is between your legs. Gender is what is between your ears.