leibowde84
Veteran Member
The reason why people associate pigs with these negative attributes is a product of Islam and Judaism teaching them to be accurrate. You have this backwards. And, why would this act to show anything about eating pork as being immoral?Please read # 4 above post 27
copy
4=People also have something to say about this animal:
a--- "" Pig-related idioms
A number of idioms related to pigs have entered the English language.
Several of these idioms refer to the negative qualities traditionally ascribed to pigs. Thus, pigs are commonly associated with greed of various forms.
Pigs in popular culture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia""
b---http://Why You Should Consider Not Eating Pork | Collective-Evolution
c---http://Pig & Pork Facts
All this is found and said by wise people after life experiences .....AND....it is same as God said.
I, humbly, have hard time with [ because people's testimony and scriptures both are given..]
Back to Original Post, It is superiority of Islam and Holy Quran that they give directives and tell the wisdom too....In this case, wisdom of not eating pork is given by All-Knowing Allah the Exalted in the word used for it. i.e. Khinzir (Su-ar)
""One matter to be kept in mind in this context is that in the very name of this animal, God has indicated the reason for the prohibition of its flesh. The Arabic word for swine is Khinzir which is a compound of Khanz and Ara, which means: I see it very foul. Thus the very name that God Almighty gave to this animal at the beginning points to its uncleanness. It is a curious coincidence that in Hindi this animal is called Su’ar, which is a compound of Su’ and Ara. This also means: I see it very foul. It should not be a matter of surprise that the Arabic word Su
should have found its way into Hindi. We have established in our book Minanur-Rahman, that Arabic is the mother of all languages and that many Arabic words are to be found in all languages. Thus Su’ is an Arabic word and its equivalent in Hindi is bad. This animal is also called bad in Hindi. There is no doubt that at the time when Arabic was the universal language this animal was known in this country by an Arabic name which was synonymous with Khinzir, and so it has continued to this day. It is possible that in Sanskrit this word might have undergone some transformation, but the true word is Khinzir which proclaims its own meaning. It is not necessary to enter into a detailed exposition of the foulness of this animal. Everyone knows that it eats filth and is utterly shameless. Thus the reason for the prohibition of its flesh is obvious, as by the law of nature its flesh would have a foul effect on the body and the soul of one who eats it. As we have already demonstrated food affects a person’s soul and there can be no doubt that the flesh of such a foul animal would also be foul. Even in pre-Islamic times, Greek physicians had opined that the flesh of this animal particularly damages the faculty of modesty and fosters shamelessness.""
[Ref: Post 16 of "The Philosophy of Teachings of Islam" @ alislam.org]
I'll try to simplify the issue a bit. You have provided examples of how pigs are associated with negative aspects of humanity linguistically. Linguistics or language is a 100% man-made invention. So linguistic connotations merely show that people have a bad view of something, in this case pigs. But, that is easily explained by the fact that 2 of the most common religions in the world have outlawed eating them. So, this would say nothing about the reasoning behind the notion that eating pork is "immoral".