Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, that can vary a bit by state. One might be in trouble in a very anti-gun state with an anti-gun jury.It depends upon the prosecutor.
Some are pro-armed self defense.
Some (where I live) are not.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, that can vary a bit by state. One might be in trouble in a very anti-gun state with an anti-gun jury.It depends upon the prosecutor.
Some are pro-armed self defense.
Some (where I live) are not.
Yes, when people get hurt or killed it is always major. And that is why this case better not end with the result "accident" because that would indicate that such a thing can happen again any day and no-one cares.This was pretty major. But we are of course discussing this from a legal point of view.
It is time to stop digging.
It depends upon the prosecutor.
Some are pro-armed self defense.
Some (where I live) are not.
Even if one is tried & found not guilty,
I wouldn't call this being "off scot free".
Note that the "S" in "scot" should not be capitalized.
(Nothing to do with Scotsmen or Dred Scott.)
The term, "scot", once meant a tax.
?"It is time to stop digging"
Post #137 lol
I think that I have pointed out that more training appears to be the solution. I have heard law enforcement people decry the lack of proper training for most officers. For example if you want police not to use deadly force then one has to provide reasonable alternatives. Training in unarmed combat would help immensely. Police could use a fair amount of training in mixed martial arts. Just knowing how to control someone by lying on top of them, And that does not mean resting one's body weight on the neck of a person that is already cuffed.Yes, when people get hurt or killed it is always major. And that is why this case better not end with the result "accident" because that would indicate that such a thing can happen again any day and no-one cares.
I don't say that the officer is guilty, but someone is. At least responsible. At the end someone has to take that responsibility and say "we did this and that wrong and we gonna change it".
Is it so hard to conceptualize the notion that people may become genuinely angry or outraged over situations like this one, and that riots may be genuine collective outbursts of such outrage or anger in very public spaces?Its sad that many use these shootings to riot, loot and destroy business. They aren't doing anything to help the cause. They are actually harming the cause.
From the article...The police chief also resigned.
Brooklyn Center Police Chief And Officer Who Shot Daunte Wright Resign
I always find it amusing that people who have never been in a situation where they have to make split secondlife-and-death situations believe they are qualified to criticize those who have, and who make a mistake.
Justice served, carless cops should be held accountable for their acts of manslaughter.
Yep. I just see all the cases where cops got of scot free for even more reckless behaviour (and not just incompetence).In the news....
Ex-cop Kim Potter guilty of manslaughter in Daunte Wright killing
She should spend a long time in prison. Remember that
a truck driver recently got a 110 year sentence for an
accident that killed 4 people. Civilians pay for their
mistakes that harm others. Cops should too.