Like I said in the OP, it does not matter what the peasants want, this matter will be decided for them by their betters.But the voters took away the right of
Pubs to deny others the right to abortion.
That appears to be the complaint.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Like I said in the OP, it does not matter what the peasants want, this matter will be decided for them by their betters.But the voters took away the right of
Pubs to deny others the right to abortion.
That appears to be the complaint.
We can always hope that the peasants (sometimes referred to as voters) will eventually have a say. Ohio is way up north, quite close to Canuckistan, actually, and prime candidate for a switch from red to blue. They've quite enough urban areas to manage that, and it's well-known that they've pretty much always been a swing state. Even more importantly, they're also known as a bell-wether state -- and if the Republicans **** the voters off enough, that bell-wether status might be most welcome to the Democrats.Like I said in the OP, it does not matter what the peasants want, this matter will be decided for them by their betters.
What about forcing people to go against their conscious and religious beliefs?No one is looking to take away an individual's right to choose not to have an abortion. Someone else choosing differently for themselves in no way infringes on the rights of any individual to choose for their own self. With freedom of choice, everyone retains their individual freedom of choice and of individual autonomy. These are individual rights, so the only way when one side loses is when one individual is denied their own individual freedom of choice.
More like forcing people to perform abortions when they don't want to.But the voters took away the right of
Pubs to deny others the right to abortion.
That appears to be the complaint.
Examples of this?More like forcing people to perform abortions when they don't want to.
Trump administration.....Examples of this?
This appears to be the hospital forcingUS hospital 'forced' Catholic nurse to assist with abortion
The Trump administration says the Catholic nurse objected on religious grounds but was ignored.www.bbc.com
Added on additional info.This appears to be the hospital forcing
the nurse to do the task, not government.
Government only requires non-discrimination
by the hospital.
I see the issue of bodily integrity as irrelevant to the issue. Abortion, as a moral or religious issue strikes me more as a crime against the fœtus than a violation of the mother's rights.No one is looking to take away an individual's right to choose not to have an abortion. Someone else choosing differently for themselves in no way infringes on the rights of any individual to choose for their own self. With freedom of choice, everyone retains their individual freedom of choice and of individual autonomy. These are individual rights, so the only way when one side loses is when one individual is denied their own individual freedom of choice.
Indications are that they are going to go through with the amendment and that they are going to review every law concerning abortion that is on the books in Ohio. It's a six part complicated amendment with ambiguous wording, and it boths allows and disallows abortions. I think the amendment was poorly written. Whoever was responsible for writing the amendment really failed the people here. But whatever. Ohio has its amendment and the legislature is going to sit down and go through every single abortion law instead of leaving it to judicial review because they didn't get someone to write a properly clean, clear amendment from the very beginning. I wonder if there wasn't some deliberate confusopoly involved.
Washington state too, if that is not your state, it is then just: Washington State.It's in the Constitution of my State.
Home sweet home.Washington state too, if that is not your state, it is then just: Washington State.
That's the employer, not the government.Trump administration.....
US hospital 'forced' Catholic nurse to assist with abortion
The Trump administration says the Catholic nurse objected on religious grounds but was ignored.www.bbc.com
Nope. That was about providing health care insurance coverage for birth control, not abortion.Biden administration.. .
Biden Trying to Force Catholic Hospitals, Doctors to Commit Abortions
It has been widely reported that Joe Biden is looking to destroy religious liberty safeguards that President Donald Trump set up during his administration, this includes keeping Catholics and Christians from having to commit abortions. Bill Donohue writes in Life News: News of Biden’s latest war...prolifeupdate.com
Example? Half the hospital beds here in Washington state are in Catholic hospitals. I haven't heard of any of them being forced to provide abortions, and the right to an abortion is written into our state constitution.What about forcing people to go against their conscious and religious beliefs?
Ie: Catholic hospitals and staff.
The first one wasn't.That's the employer, not the government.
Nope. That was about providing health care insurance coverage for birth control, not abortion.
SF nuns say they are caught in the crossfire over a battle over birth control
BATTLE OVER BIRTH CONTROL: Seven nuns from the Little Sisters of the Poor listened in court as attorneys argued over whether the nuns should have to pay for contraceptive coverage as part of their health care benefits.abc7news.com
The Biden link that seeks to force people against their religious position. At present they're not forced but in the future it appears if Biden gets his way, that will become another issue.Example? Half the hospital beds here in Washington state are in Catholic hospitals. I haven't heard of any of them being forced to provide abortions, and the right to an abortion is written into our state constitution.
If you can't provide health insurance that meets government standards, then get out of the health insurance business. Part of the government's business is to protect consumers from sub-standard insurance.The Biden link that seeks to force people against their religious position. At present they're not forced but in the future it appears if Biden gets his way, that will become another issue.
What makes you think that those organizations would be forced to do abortions? Once again, abortions are a specialty. That abortions are legal is part of my states constitution. Catholic hospitals are not forced to offer abortions.What about forcing people to go against their conscious and religious beliefs?
Ie: Catholic hospitals and staff.
Let's go ahead and look at this from the other side. Catholic hospitals will perform abortions when the patient's life is in danger, such as in the case of an ectopic pregnancy or severe trauma (from something like a car accident) where the placenta has detached, resulting in severe hemorrhaging. They are health care professionals, and know when this is necessary. Do you want the state interfering in this medical discernment with the threat of jail and/or lawsuits for saving the patient's life? That's what is happening in states with severe abortion bans. Politicians are not healthcare professionals, and are not really qualified to make that decision sight unseen. The doctors are not lawyers, and should not have to lawyer up in order to save someone's life.What about forcing people to go against their conscious and religious beliefs?
Ie: Catholic hospitals and staff.
In this case, I don't think the the Ohio legislature has much choice. The voters voted to adopt a poorly written amendment on abortion.Why can't they help the poor, sick and marginalized instead of sticking their noses in where they're not wanted?