Oklahoma Republican Doesn't Like That You Can't Hit Kids ...Even Those with Impairments

[Wandering Monk]

And what about the parents who DON'T agree with corporal punishment in their schools? Do their kids get hit as well? Justifying this with Bible verses!

At about 1:40 he brings impaired into the mix of who can be hit, because not hitting them implies that we don't love them!

 

[Pogo]

And what about the parents who DON'T agree with corporal punishment in their schools? Do their kids get hit as well? Justifying this with Bible verses!

At about 1:40 he brings impaired into the mix of who can be hit, because not hitting them implies that we don't love them!

I like the dual occupancy kiddie desks, the pretend adults not so much.

 

[Secret Chief]

And god said yea assault those with disabilities. What the actual is going on in America?

 

[Wandering Monk]

And god said yea assault those with disabilities. What the actual is going on in America?

Christo-Fascism is on the rise.

 

[☆Dreamwind☆]

It bothers me that we can't easily fire dumb, ******* politicians everytime they open their yaps, or try to take away civil rights. Let's make that a law instead.

 

[Revoltingest]

Christo-Fascism is on the rise.

I like the term "Christian Dominionism".

 

[Kenny]

And what about the parents who DON'T agree with corporal punishment in their schools? Do their kids get hit as well? Justifying this with Bible verses!

At about 1:40 he brings impaired into the mix of who can be hit, because not hitting them implies that we don't love them!

But it is ok for Democrats to kill a baby that is alive after brith..

Dems block Senate GOP bill on infants surviving abortions

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have threatened prison for doctors who don't try saving the life of infants born alive during abortions.

apnews.com

It’s different when you hit with intent to kill b/c it’s a baby.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I knew that this was coming when they banned the beating of slaves by making slavery illegal. Sheesh what's next? Women pastors?

 

[Subduction Zone]

But it is ok for Democrats to kill a baby that is alive after brith..

Dems block Senate GOP bill on infants surviving abortions

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have threatened prison for doctors who don't try saving the life of infants born alive during abortions.

apnews.com

It’s different when you hit with intent to kill b/c it’s a baby.

Seriously, if you are going to post an article you should read the whole thing:

"Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. They said it is part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth."

Your claim is refuted by your own source.

 

[Revoltingest]

But it is ok for Democrats to kill a baby that is alive after brith..

Under what conditions is this done?
When has it been done?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Under what conditions is this done?
When has it been done?

His own link refuted his claim. It was just grandstanding by Republicans along with an impotent threat against doctors in an attempt to stop needed medical intervention. The number of elective abortions at that point in a pregnancy is almost zero. The doctors that do late term abortions tend to do them only when the life of the mother is threatened or if the fetus will die a painful death shortly after birth. This is downright evil since these mothers really wanted to have a child and circumstances did not make that possible.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Under what conditions is this done?
When has it been done?

It does seem to me that raising hypotheticals that have never happened is equivalent to building a strawman.

 

[Pogo]

But it is ok for Democrats to kill a baby that is alive after brith..

Dems block Senate GOP bill on infants surviving abortions

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have threatened prison for doctors who don't try saving the life of infants born alive during abortions.

apnews.com

It’s different when you hit with intent to kill b/c it’s a baby.

No, it was a vote against stupid legislation not for some imaginary hypothetical.

 

[Kenny]

Seriously, if you are going to post an article you should read the whole thing:

"Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. They said it is part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth."

Your claim is refuted by your own source.

Apparently you didn’t read what you wrote… “Opponents” = justification. - the bill just said if it was born alive, save the baby.

 

[Kenny]

No, it was a vote against stupid legislation not for some imaginary hypothetical.

I think it just triggers people when I show there are extremists on both sides.

 

[Kenny]

Under what conditions is this done?
When has it been done?

often… would you like me to site some cases?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Apparently you didn’t read what you wrote… “Opponents” = justification. - the bill just said if it was born alive, save the baby.

No, if anyone has a reading problem it is likely you. Read the quote. This was already illegal. The law was redundant and only slightly twisted to make those performing these sorts of abortions have to look over their shoulder.

Statistics show that late term abortions are exceedingly rare and almost always done because they are medically necessary. I do not know of any insurance that covers elective late term abortions. They are far more expensive and disabling then regular abortions that occur early in a pregnancy. You bought into the hype and it affected your reading comprehension.

 

[Subduction Zone]

often… would you like me to site some cases?

If you cannot find reliable sources that do not distort the surgery then go ahead. If you can't then posting from garbage sites will be seen as you admitting that you were wrong.

 

[Pogo]

I think it just triggers people when I show there are extremists on both sides.

Highlighting your extremist interpretation does not address the purpose of finding a useful common ground.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I think it just triggers people when I show there are extremists on both sides.

I only see extremism from the anti-choice crowd. Once again, the law was redundant. The law had ulterior motives. That makes the right extremist. Not the left. I am sure that at other times for other laws it has been the other way around. But this time there is only one "bad guy" in this scenario.