How is that relevant to a discussion aboutLol yeah
Yet we toss more and more money at education as if lack of money is the problem.
not wasting students' time on Bible study?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How is that relevant to a discussion aboutLol yeah
Yet we toss more and more money at education as if lack of money is the problem.
A rational mind knows that the nature of grass is to be green. A rational mind doesn't hear the word grass and think purple. I'm it sure why people just admit they hate and are angry and otherwise nastyWell, not if is hasn't rained in a lot of time and it hasn't been watered. So try again and make a rational answer that holds.
Point to the constitutionYeah, as a vocabulary word, do you know what it means?
It's very relevant. You're chirping that students need to learn "important" stuff but they arent learning important t stuff they're learning demented leftists clap trap garbage.How is that relevant to a discussion about
not wasting students' time on Bible study?
No, that is not what it means, but anyhow.Point to the constitution
I see no issue with the Bible as literature in the classroom. Religious
The Bible as literature should be in schools,
dogma, however has no business in schools.
Just tell us where it says the Bible can't be taught in schoolNo, that is not what it means, but anyhow.
Full Text of the U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center
Did you forget that you were "chirping"It's very relevant. You're chirping that students need to learn "important" stuff but they arent learning important t stuff they're learning demented leftists clap trap garbage.
1st & 14th Amendments (Incorporation Doctrine).Just tell us where it says the Bible can't be taught in school
Again no where doesn't say the Bible can't be taught in schools.1st & 14th Amendments (Incorporation Doctrine).
In those Amendments.Again no where doesn't say the Bible can't be taught in schools.
As i no where does it prohibit the teaching of the bible. The only thing preventing it is peoples hatred for the bible.In those Amendments.
If you're looking for specific mention of the "Bible", you'll be disappointed.
It also doesn't specifically prohibit raping children.As i no where does it prohibit the teaching of the bible. The only thing preventing it is peoples hatred for the bible.
The drama queenery of you people is hilarious. Lots of hours practicing in front of the mirror.It also doesn't specifically prohibit raping children.
However, teaching the Bible in public is like raping
children in that both prohibitions are deduced from
the Constitution & Amendments.
As literature it can as has always been, but as dogma (a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.)Just tell us where it says the Bible can't be taught in school
I like it when newbies settle down,The drama queenery of you people is hilarious. Lots of hours practicing in front of the mirror.
Newbie? More like a retiree from elsewhere.I like it when newbies settle down,
& ease up on the sanctimony. But
they don't always grow out of it.
Possible.Newbie? More like a retiree from elsewhere.
A rational mind knows that the nature of grass is to be green. A rational mind doesn't hear the word grass and think purple. I'm it sure why people just admit they hate and are angry and otherwise nasty
Isn't that enough?As i no where does it prohibit the teaching of the bible. The only thing preventing it is peoples hatred for the bible.