Native
Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Fits nicely my perception of the lunar formaton out of the Earth."The Moon is thought to have formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago, not long after Earth.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Fits nicely my perception of the lunar formaton out of the Earth."The Moon is thought to have formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago, not long after Earth.
Fits nicely my perception of the lunar formaton out of the Earth.
I´m fairly sure it is - with a slight difference of the amount of composition.So the moon is made out of similar stuff to the earth...and so?
My understanding is that the tidal bulge is pulled forward by the rotation of Earth, so it goes ahead of the Moon and pulls it forward, and hence increase its velocity. At least that's how they explained in it my astronomy class to be the reason to Moon recession.
I know someone may think this is a far fetched explanation, but:True, but the tidal bulge is a lot more than water. That's just the easiest part to see.
I know someone may think this is a far fetched explanation, but:
What if the synchronic "gravitational" motions of the Earth and the Moon just mirrors the initial lunar formation out from the Earth? Wouldn´t this be a plausible explanation? I think so indeed.
No new ideas??? Have you seen this description otherwhere? Where?Once again, new words - no new ideas. This is the same thing you've said in every post without further clarification or evidence
asking for 'proof'.....?Regarding those who claim "hard evidences":
Where are the solid and concrete proofs in standing cosmology? As far as I´m concerned there are no differences between mine circumstantial evidences and assumptions and those in the modern cosmology.
I was referring to those in this topic who asks for proofs of me and take the standing cosmological assumptions for granted even though they also lacks solid proofs.asking for 'proof'.....?
and the result of what experiment are you waiting for?
ah yes.....we are all in the same small boat.....(planet)I was referring to those in this topic who asks for proofs of me and take the standing cosmological assumptions for granted even though they also lacks solid proofs.
I´m not a creationist, but as a Comparative Mythologist I would like to have a go with an explanation. When reading the numerous cultural Myths of Creation, it is very likely that "in the beginning" doesn´t mean "the beginning of the entire Universe".Genesis 1:1 states: "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
I am a creationist and this is one that is hard to explain.
Can we fathom God's wisdom? God knows everything. He is omniscient. Just think about other moons and mother planets. Do they have water? The moon itself, is there water or seas like what we here on earth?
Gravity is still a bit of a mystery, agree, but we do know that there's a gravitational force of some kind, even if we don't fully understand how it works.I know. This is the standard gravitational explanation - which no one really can explain causally or logically and it include a "spooky force acting on distance without any visible connection" as it is said. I don´t accept this explanation because it only "explain" "half the truth" regarding motions in space, namely the attractive motion and not the expulsive motions in cosmos.
Not seeing what I was asking for. I think I might have not understood what you were suggesting earlier, and my question wasn't clear either. Let's leave it for now. Perhaps I get the answer I'm looking for later on in this thread.I wrote:
Yes, I have a short description here on the free alternative peer review website, vixra.org - "Circular Galactic Formation" - http://vixra.org/abs/1605.0283
PS: Just by the very looks of a barred galaxy you can intuitively and logically conclude the motion to go outwards from the center. There is no way a galactic arm can take a suddenly 90 degree turn from the arms into the barred structure if the motion should go outwards in. - Look here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barre...ubble2005-01-barred-spiral-galaxy-NGC1300.jpg
Cheers
As a matter of fact they do.Can we fathom God's wisdom? God knows everything. He is omniscient. Just think about other moons and mother planets. Do they have water?
Why does it have to be exactly like Earth? There used to be a thicker atmosphere and flowing water on Mars. Now, most water is frozen, but some of it does melt occasionally.The moon itself, is there water or seas like what we here on earth?
I see what you're saying. The crust and the planet itself also bulges. Very true.True, but the tidal bulge is a lot more than water. That's just the easiest part to see.
I've seen the same essential description here:"What if the synchronic "gravitational" motions of the Earth and the Moon just mirrors the initial lunar formation out from the Earth? Wouldn´t this be a plausible explanation? I think so indeed".
No new ideas??? Have you seen this description otherwhere? Where?
From your link:
I don´t think so. The cause of this is that the Moon once was ejected from the Earth early in the formation when the entire Solar System was molten hot.
I wrote:
"I don´t think so. The cause of this is that the Moon once was ejected from the Earth early in the formation when the entire Solar System was molten hot".
I think they are. Imagine when the Earth still was molten hot very early in the formation of the Solar system and the Moon was ejected from the Earth. In this way the Moon would follow the motion of its mother planet with a rotation which fits its orbital motion around the Earth = the locked motion.
This can also confirm the still annual receding motion away from the Earth
You have to imagine an initial spinning sphere which become the entire Solar System where the planets are ejected fmo this central sphere and where the Moons are ejected from their mother planets.
In this spinning motion and formation the moons logically will follow the mother planets with an orbital motion and 1 lunar rotation as the momentum is given by the mother planets.
Here, here and here . . .I've seen the same essential description here: