Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Democracy has been progressing and regressing at different rates in different regions (including regression in many of the nations that supposedly hold it as the foundation of their society such as moves in western democracies away from individual rights and ignoring the demonstration of sustained, widespread popular sentiment and opinion contrary to public policy). It is difficult to suggest democracy is continuing to expand unabated or that such will also hold true for other 'western values'.
Huh.
I always just thought of it as the term for "people who live there first."
Then again, I don't subscribe to the conception of "primitive" in terms of technological development.
I view it the same way as you do. I just thought you would find it interesting.
Actually I would amend that to include the property and claims to land ownership of those individual's provided that the land were either capable of becoming a self sufficient nation or was adjacent to another nation willing to accommodate that land and it's people (and that those people were willing to join)... but in no other case....
To me, the rules of a society are it's to arrive at, through whatever means it desires. Yes, that would extend to genocide, though I would note that such activities (such as preventing these targeted groups from leaving the area before such a determination is made or to deny them whatever mechanism exists by which to express their voice in the rule setting process) would violate my own ethical framework, thus in such a case I might perceive an ethical dilemma suggesting my need to act to secure the right of such a group to leave that society (not to control their society in any fashion, including providing them with democratic rights, but merely to allow them to exit the control of that society) were my attempt to secure such an exit thwarted I might well consider the need to do so forcibly against that society (given the international society has some legitimate authority to supersede national (for example) sovereignty in a case of an existential threat to a subgroup, in my opinion anyway).
Gharib;3278043]I know how Lebanese Muslims are, I hate saying it but the truth is the truth, from what I have seen, Lebanese Muslims are the black sheep in the family when it comes to manners. They (not all) take Islam lightly and hardly act upon it. I probably shouldn't generalize but I am yet to meet a gentle and quiet Lebanese Muslim. They are very loud, have no regard for other people and it must always be their way.
But take into consideration that they are a people who are in constant war against the Israelis and within themselves they are forced to be like that whether they like it or not, daily life is all about survival and they continue in this way even when they live in another country. The kids on the other had do as they see.