• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

palestine is for Jews or arabs ?

JacobEzra.

Dr. Greenthumb
I always thought that it would have been much better if jews had been given a much larger amount of land in some sparsely populated country like canada or australia :D. Its not like theres a shortage of land in those countries.

It was obvious that settling them in israel would have incited violence and hatred.
I understand its their ancestral home, but the option above would have granted Jews their own country without hostile neighbours in every direction. Well, its too late now, but I think it would have been a much better choice.

How was it obvious at first?

Though I do wonder, considering Herzl only wanted to stop antisemitism, if he knew ehat the future held, would he have started the movement?
 

gnomon

Well-Known Member
Am I the only one, after so many pages, who can't get past thinking, "Silly Rabbit. Palestine is for kids.".

Certainly someone has already said that.

edit: I should have mumbled that. More like, "Silly Rabbit. Palestine is for kids".
 
Last edited:

JMorris

Democratic Socialist
Am I the only one, after so many pages, who can't get past thinking, "Silly Rabbit. Palestine is for kids.".

Certainly someone has already said that.
of course its for kids, why else would there so much fighting over it?
 

839311

Well-Known Member
How was it obvious at first?

Practically all muslim countries voted against this idea, including all countries that would be future neighbours, and there was a lot of open hostility from them. Civil war occured pretty much right away in 1947.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
I always thought that it would have been much better if jews had been given a much larger amount of land in some sparsely populated country like canada or australia :D. Its not like theres a shortage of land in those countries.

It was obvious that settling them in israel would have incited violence and hatred.
I understand its their ancestral home, but the option above would have granted Jews their own country without hostile neighbours in every direction. Well, its too late now, but I think it would have been a much better choice.

Captain Hindsight to the rescue!
 
Top