The wall will cost billions, not millionsSo what is the real purpose of a wall that will cost millions of dollars and will not stop a single person from crossing the border?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The wall will cost billions, not millionsSo what is the real purpose of a wall that will cost millions of dollars and will not stop a single person from crossing the border?
Blunt, but reality.Dang, that's pretty blunt. American Exceptionalism at it's finest?
When they aid in the process of violating our laws they have an obligation to be met.How would you justify forcing a foreign government to pay for our security infrastructure anyway?
Sure they do.
They don't though. We can put a wall tax on remittances or a wall tariff until it's paid for; they have no say. Furthermore, they aren't in a situation to get into economic retaliation.Sure they do, they've said "no" on multiple occasions now.
Can you explain to me the legal theory under which the government can just claim these remittances?They don't though. We can put a wall tax on remittances or a wall tariff until it's paid for; they have no say. Furthermore, they aren't in a situation to get into economic retaliation.
Predator drones flying along the borderHow exactly is this proposed wall going to stop a group of people using tunnels?
Drones or moles?Predator drones flying along the border
Billions to build the wall, billions to maintain the wall, billions to defend the wall.Predator drones flying along the border
Drones or moles?
Nah gotta be war badgers
Why?When they aid in the process of violating our laws they have an obligation to be met.
Yeah they do. It's not their wall, they aren't commissioning it, they aren't asking for it, there is no way to make them pay for it. They are not going to pay for it. Period.They don't have a say.
How is the Mexican government "aiding int he process of violation our laws?" And if you're going to go by that standard, America owes many places, including Mexico, a crap ton of money.When they aid in the process of violating our laws they have an obligation to be met.
Can you explain the legal theory that governments can't tax money leaving the country? Heck, Oklahoma already has a remittance tax.Can you explain to me the legal theory under which the government can just claim these remittances?
Because they aiding criminal migrants in traveling to America. I'm actually not in full favor of Mexico paying for the entirety of the wall, rather that is the beginning point in negotiations.Why?
It is both. We do need to have strict sanctions and easy nation-wide worker eligibility verification.It's USA citizens causing the problems.
Yes, we can make them pay for it. No, there is nothing they can do about it. Tax remittances to Mexico at 10% at it is payed for in 8 years and, again, Mexico can do nothing to stop that from happening.Yeah they do. It's not their wall, they aren't commissioning it, they aren't asking for it, there is no way to make them pay for it. They are not going to pay for it. Period.
By doing things like giving illegal migrants coming into Mexico from Guatemala travel passes to facilitate their movement to America, having government funded groups point the way and provide care for immigrants that travel through Mexico, to pay legal fees for illegal immigrants to go through programs like DACA. Mexico doesn't want central Americans stuck in Mexico so they shuffle them along to America and they do want Mexican immigrants in America so they can leech off of our economy.How is the Mexican government "aiding int he process of violation our laws?"
It's good to be king.And if you're going to go by that standard, America owes many places, including Mexico, a crap ton of money.
From former Mexican President Vincente Fox:Do you think the Mexican government will pay for it later?
Trump may ask whoever he wants, but still neither myself nor Mexico are going to pay for his racist monument. Another promise he can't keep.
NAFTA.Can you explain the legal theory that governments can't tax money leaving the country? Heck, Oklahoma already has a remittance tax.
So now people are supposed to imagine the wall is not a colossal waste of time and money?As expected. The Trump haters are completely unimaginative.
Theorizing and what will actually happen in reality/is legally allowed are two different things. Maybe you have not been reading what has been happening in Mexico lately with the cartels, but I'm pretty sure no one in charge there (cartels or otherwise) are actually worried any sort of economic retaliation and haven't been for a while.They don't though. We can put a wall tax on remittances or a wall tariff until it's paid for; they have no say. Furthermore, they aren't in a situation to get into economic retaliation.
Oh, it very well might be. What's unimaginative is that they can't understand there may be alternative ways to get Mexico to pay for the wall other than by outright payment up front. How about trade embargoes, using confiscated drug money, other fees, penalties etc.So now people are supposed to imagine the wall is not a colossal waste of time and money?
All of which involve money, just in another form. How can Trump supporters be so unimaginative to not understand that?What's unimaginative is that they can't understand there may be alternative ways to get Mexico to pay for the wall other than by outright payment up front. How about trade embargoes, using confiscated drug money, other fees, penalties etc.