Petition Against God

[austheist]

well?

 

[austheist]

Without a description or definition, we fail to know what an urpal is. We fail to know what we are talking about.

 

[Bishka]

Without a description or definition, we fail to know what an urpal is. We fail to know what we are talking about.

Are you relating this to God? If you are, you obviously didn't listen very well in your Sunday School lessons. Especially if you were LDS as you claim. The LDS church gives descriptions and defintions of what God is and what He isn't, and if you have studied other Christians faiths they also do the same.

 

[austheist]

If we don't know what an urpal is, then say, " I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.

 

[mr.guy]

Without a description or definition, we fail to know what an urpal is.

Why is that necessary to believe in it?

 

[austheist]

I'm getting to that becky. be patient

 

[Bishka]

Don't chide me, or talk down to me, I don't appreciate it. Don't do it again.

 

[austheist]

without a description, God makes no more sense than an urpal.

 

[austheist]

All right, I'm sorry becky. I didn't mean to offend you.

 

[mr.guy]

without a description, God makes no more sense than an urpal.

You've "shot your load" a little early here, and have yet to answer my last question. I didn't ask if something needed to make sense to believe it, i asked why i needed a definition or description to believe something.

 

[austheist]

If something doesn't make sense, then it is irrational. Isn't that what irrational means?

 

[austheist]

If we don't know what an urpal is, then say, " I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.

This applies to anything, including god

 

[austheist]

So, how about those superpowers?

 

[austheist]

And it seems he left. To go on with this argument would be to go on to admit irrationality of the belief in a God. Anybody else want to pick up where he left off, be my guest.

 

[mr.guy]

If something doesn't make sense, then it is irrational. Isn't that what irrational means?

Irrelevent and, incedently, incorrect. You still haven't answered my question. Can i assume you'll continue to ignore them, running through your script, or are you going to tell me why a belief must be describable?

 

[Bishka]

Yay Mr. Guy. For once, I agree with you.

 

[austheist]

I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.This applies to God as well.

 

[Bishka]

Yet, there is description of God, like I said, you didn't listen to well in Sunday School. There is proof, yet you have to take this proof on faith.

 

[austheist]

I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.This applies to God as well.

Unie is another word for something that is undescribed. I meant to use urpal for consistency sake, but unie means the same thing, something that is undescribed.

 

[austheist]

Great, finally, you agree that something must be described in order to believe in it, yes?