• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Picture of Mars vs. the earth. So how did Moses know?

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Some sceptics say that Jesus did not write anything and so we don't know what He said.
David and Solomon wrote things and sceptic still question their existence.
You should keep up with the findings of archaeology and you might realise that there is evidence for David and Solomon, but who cares, they wrote things and you don't think they existed. I wonder how much evidence would have to be found for you to accept their existence.
What do you think Jesus wrote down?
 

MyM

Well-Known Member
That is definitely not "common sense" when it comes to evolution. Human beings didn't evolve from any living great apes, rather, we share a common ancestor with them. Nobody that understands evolution expects to see "documented proof we came from apes ... eyewitnesses, reports, etc." because nobody who understands evolution thinks we evolved from any living great apes. This is known based on patterned similarities (nested hierarchies) found when comparing our genomes. The same method is used when tracing family lineages. It's how you know that you and your cousin share a common ancestor in your grandparents, for example.

I would suggest taking a course in evolution, for a better understanding of it.

A good starting place:
Evolution 101 - Understanding Evolution

So then, where did we come from? We just sprang up out of where ?
 

Suave

Simulated character
Do you know, Suave, when light is first mentioned in Genesis 1?

Verse 3. So what was the source of that light?

Day 1 also tells us ‘there was day and night.’ That means the Sun’s light was there already.

The Sun itself just wasn’t visible until Day 4, apparently due to heavy cloud cover, the “darkness” in verse 2.
By God Hockeycowboy, you might very well be correct. The Earth's early atmosphere may have been a hazy mix of methane and carbon dioxide until it became oxygenated by plants, at which time the heavens became visible from the Earth's surface.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Understatement by a factor of one million is sure a mistake.

I do not see any evidence of design. What exists is explained by science except for one question - "Where from all this arose?" You too have no answer for that except 'Goddidit", which explains nothing. You do not have any evidence for existence of God or that he sent any "savior". Sure, there may have been a Jesus who was crucified by Romans. That too has no historical evidence.
The evidence of design is that a leaf is not a moon.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Then don't try to invoke science to prove your religious beliefs.
The Bible is not a science book. Scientists themselves make conjectures about things in the universe, and their perceptions can change and they do quite often. Again -- I appreciate microscopes and telescopes, if you consider that part of science. I appreciate vaccines. I also appreciate that there is a God who cares and will change things on the earth for the good of mankind. (Have a nice day.)
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
But they are different when emerging. Human infants are usually not mistaken for baby buffaloes.
Yeah, true. But the embryo has gone through all the stages of evolution. That of a molecule, which is what it is at the beginning when sperm enters the ovum, to a new born baby.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
By God Hockeycowboy, you might very well be correct. The Earth's early atmosphere may have been a hazy mix of methane and carbon dioxide until it became oxygenated by plants, at which time the heavens became visible from the Earth's surface.
It could very well have been. We know the Creative days were unspecified long periods of time — Jehovah told Adam he’d die ‘in the day he ate from’ the tree, and his death was years later — so early Earth could have been unsuitable for life at it’s beginning.

But Genesis 1:1 says “God created the heavens and the Earth.” The Heavens would include our Sun, don’t you think? So it would of necessity be the source of the “light” in verse 2.
It’s just that it wasn’t seen. Until Day 4.

A hint to understanding chapter 1, is that it’s written from the perspective of an observer on the ground… as if the author - Moses - was there.
A vision? We’re not told.
 
Top