Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
The difference here is that the restricted item (gun, etc.) could be bought, but not moved across state or town lines.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Planned Parenthood takes its show on the road
- Thread starter Shaul
- Start date
The difference here is that the restricted item (gun, etc.) could be bought, but not moved across state or town lines.
I'm glad you're not worried.
As to protesters, I think at this point there are no illusions as to whether they will be present.
That can be said of all medical facilities. Our hospitals had to really prioritise their emergencies and were overrun for quite some time due to the pandemic. Affecting how they operate and quality of medical care. But we managed in the end. Granted it showed us that we need to fix up a lot of areas in our healthcare system and how the government funds it. But still.
I mean a mobile PP is still better than nothing, which is what I’m hearing if there’s no local hospitals in this area.
It’s not the best and indeed a hospital and PP should be stationed there it sounds like to me. Maybe a few depending on the needs of the community.
Indeed if a mobile PP is in the area and there’s no close by hospitals, that sounds like a major failure of the government to me
Like I said, I don’t know how it works in the US. So I can’t comment one way or the other. Others seem to think it won’t so I dunno.
Augustus
…
Perhaps the solution is to let the women have abortions in a safe and convenient medical facility close to their homes?
(And you are also wrong, a mobile service run by professionals is obviously far better than an illegal abortion)
"Goddamn liberal commies! First they try to mitigate the harm we caused with our abortion ban, now they are wasting taxpayers money because the police need to protect patients and medical professionals from the violence we want to inflict on them!"
Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Gotta love Merican ingenuity. Gahd bless the USA!
Take a look at this map. I can see why Illinois will need mobile clinics. It looks like North Carolina and Kansas are going to have their hands full, as well.
Nearest US Abortion Clinics: How Far Americans Have to Travel for Legal Abortions
Nearest US Abortion Clinics: How Far Americans Have to Travel for Legal Abortions
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
If that's a genuine concern, then the solution would be to reinstate their rights.
That blame for that would fall upon the protesters.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Altfish
Veteran Member
Next thing you know ex-presidents will be holding rallies.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
Every woman In The US can still get an abortion. If they go somewhere shady it is on them. My wife had to travel 300 miles to get an operation she needed. We took responsibility and figured out how to do that. There are plenty of organizations popping up that will give a woman the money to get the abortion in a different state. No rights have been taken away by the Supreme Court.
That's odd.
I heard otherwise.
U.S. Supreme Court Takes Away the Constitutional Right to Abortion | Center for Reproductive Rights
Without the right, legislatures are free to ban
abortion. The fact that some states still allow
it doesn't mean it's still a right.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
it is hard to say something was taken away when anyone can use it. Anyway it is settled law so no one can change it right?
When it's a right, it can't be taken away by a state.
Since some have taken it away, it's not a right.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
I agree. It never was a right. Show me the right to abortion in the constitution. Read the roe decision. It was made up. If you want the right to abortion then advocate for an amendment.
Not only have alcohol vendors done that where state laws vary, they've done it internationally.
The Swedish-Norwegian border is just one example.
Really? What total hog wash. The rights of women voters in certain states have most definitely been taken away forcing them to either use illegal means or get out of that state
Last edited:
Would your wife or her doctor have to face criminal charges if they did the operation close to your home?
I think healthcare should be a State matter and the State should pay for abortions.
So it is not turned into a business.
But even in a traditionally Catholic country like mine, the State does not want women to use abortion as birth-control method.
Since in most regions the pill is either affordable or for free.
On TV there was an anonymous testimony. A 17 year old girl who went to one of those State facilities to get abortion, had to be visited by a psychologist first.
She asked the girl why she hadnt used any contraceptive...she asked her anything.
Questions like: " was he your boyfriend?" "How old is he?", " how did it happen?".
So it is not turned into a business.
But even in a traditionally Catholic country like mine, the State does not want women to use abortion as birth-control method.
Since in most regions the pill is either affordable or for free.
On TV there was an anonymous testimony. A 17 year old girl who went to one of those State facilities to get abortion, had to be visited by a psychologist first.
She asked the girl why she hadnt used any contraceptive...she asked her anything.
Questions like: " was he your boyfriend?" "How old is he?", " how did it happen?".
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
I see.
So, if the supreme court decides that states no longer need to supply, say, clean tap water, and as a consequence of this act several states decide to terminate the supply of clean tap water to their citizens, it doesn't count as your rights being taken away because you could still travel to another state where tap water is available if you REALLY want tap water.
And, hey, while we're at it, let's extend your logic: We can no longer claim that Nazi Germany took away the rights of Jewish citizens either, because those Jews could still have fled to some other country where there wasn't mass killing, incarceration or human rights violations against Jews.
Good logic.
Making it necessarily more difficult to gain access to a thing, or putting distinct barriers in place that could prevent certain people in certain situations from being able to access said thing, is a restriction on the freedom and rights of people who wish to access that thing. This is extremely basic logic.
