• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Polgamy - what are your views?

blackout

Violet.
Personally I think polygamy would make for a more stable, happier, and secure family. I really like entertaining the idea of having two husbands and two wives together as one family unit.

Especially in today's economy.:yes:

You NEED that many adults
to make a decent living
(without any one adult working to exhaustion)
and then also actually have time
to spend with the children,
and with one another.

It would be so much easier to support a house that way,
and it's not like the 4 adults would need more than 2 bedrooms.

I think the extended partnership model
could be VERY practical
and even... prosperous,
if the right people came together,
and worked it the right way.
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Especially in today's economy.:yes:

You NEED that many adults
to make a decent living
(without any one adult working to exhaustion)
and then also actually have time
to spend with the children,
and with one another.

It would be so much easier to support a house that way,
and it's not like the 4 adults would need more than 2 rooms.

That's very true and is the reason why I really like such a set up. Not to mention that intimacy expressed in way of love can still be preserved, and sexually when desired, can provide for the most part the needed variety.

In cases of having and rearing Children, the benefits are very obvious and clear in that its overall broader, healthier, happier and much much more stable in ways that you have already pointed out with some very good and excellent points.

I see minimal change in the way a household like this could run and function as that compared to a single couple, of which there would be noticeably far less stress involved when more support and stability is present IMO.
 

blackout

Violet.
That's very true and is the reason why I really like such a set up. Not to mention that intimacy expressed in way of love can still be preserved, and sexually when desired, can provide for the most part the needed variety.

In cases of having and rearing Children, the benefits are very obvious and clear in that its overall broader, healthier, happier and much much more stable in ways that you have already pointed out with some very good and excellent points.

I see minimal change in the way a household like this could run and function as that compared to a single couple, of which there would be noticeably far less stress involved when more support and stability is present IMO.

I agree also about the relational and sexual variety.

Where I'm coming from,
"Two couples" (total 4) everyone Bi,
would make for a most excellent family model.
 

Smoke

Done here.
Well, that's something at least. But if it were someone close to you, would you say "sorry, honey, but your wedding doesn't meet my standards?"

On Sister Wives, three of the wives grew up in polygamous families, but the second wife grew up in a regular LDS family. She said she lost most of her family and friends when she married, and didn't have a reception because there was nobody to invite.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I think polygamy is fine as along as all involved are informed, consenting adults where no one is being coerced or victimized.
 
Last edited:

Smoke

Done here.
Human beings have innate tendencies to sexual jealousy. Sure, with work and care, those tendencies can be overcome; but most people don't do the work and put in the care. And occasionally you'll find people who just naturally lack those tendencies, but they're quite rare (I have met a fair number of folks who claim to lack those tendencies, and all but one or two proved, ultimately, to be kidding themselves). When attempted as a real relationship dynamic, with truly egalitarian openness, I doubt the success rate would be more than one or two percent.
One of the interesting things about Sister Wives is that the wives do experience jealousy, but their anger about it seems to be directed at the husband, and not at the other wives. The first three, who have lived together for 16 years, seem to have their issues pretty much worked out, but the introduction of a fourth wife brought up a lot of jealousy. When the husband was "courting" her, the first three resented the time he spent away from home. Third Wife seemed to have the most trouble. She got very upset when she learned that Fourth Wife and her husband had kissed when they got engaged. She said she hadn't kissed him until they were married, because she didn't think it was appropriate to kiss a married man unless you were married to him. She also got very upset when she learned that her husband had picked out Fourth Wife's wedding dress: "Like you cared what I wore!"

First Wife is all for polygamy, entered into the marriage with the understanding that there would be more wives, and seems to have instigated at least two of the later marriages, but she had problems with jealousy, too. At one point, she said she wasn't even sure why she stayed in the marriage; then she said mostly for her child and for the family.

All of the wives seem to like the "sister wife" concept. The first three are close to each other and are making an effort to bring the fourth into their circle. Second Wife says she never wanted to be a stay-at-home mom, and is glad that it's what Third Wife always wanted. Third Wife takes over a lot of the cooking, cleaning, and nurturing of Second Wife's kids, freeing Second Wife to work long days without worrying about the kids.

Each wife has her own "house" (apartment) in the house, but they all consider the other wives' kids as their kids, too -- even though each child lives with her biological mother. They're sort of like a group of very close neighbors who work together and help each other out constantly, only they all have the same husband.

Third Wife even said she always knew she wanted to be the third wife. She didn't want to be the only wife, because she wanted sister wives from the beginning. She said she was never interested in single men. She didn't want to be the second wife, either, because she thought that was a bigger adjustment, that the second wife has to insert herself into a previously monogamous household, and she didn't want to deal with that. She wanted to be the third, and she is.

I get the impression that the wives are content in their relationships with each other; in some ways, the circle of wives seems as important, if not more so, than their marriages to the husband.

Obviously, they're trying to put the best face on things, but overall I don't see anything at all wrong with how they're living. And all four wives together still have fewer children than the Duggars. :)
 

blackout

Violet.
This is an example of what I was getting at up above...
All of the wives seem to like the "sister wife" concept. The first three are close to each other and are making an effort to bring the fourth into their circle. Second Wife says she never wanted to be a stay-at-home mom, and is glad that it's what Third Wife always wanted. Third Wife takes over a lot of the cooking, cleaning, and nurturing of Second Wife's kids, freeing Second Wife to work long days without worrying about the kids.

But not this. :p

Each wife has her own "house" (apartment) in the house, but they all consider the other wives' kids as their kids, too -- even though each child lives with her biological mother. They're sort of like a group of very close neighbors who work together and help each other out constantly, only they all have the same husband. :)
 

Smoke

Done here.
But not this. :p
I tend to agree with you. If I were involved in any sort of complex marriage I'd want it to be mutual all the way around. But I think that's just a matter of taste. Doesn't bother me what other people do.

I think it would be hard to introduce a third person into our marriage, for a number of reasons. John's more open to the idea than I am, but I wouldn't completely rule the idea out. It's just that there's a lot to consider, and I don't see how it could work for us. But if it works for other people, that's great.
 

Nerthus

Wanderlust
It's something I don't personally understand, but if it isn't doing any harm to anyone, then their private life is just that.
 

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
I agree also about the relational and sexual variety.

Where I'm coming from,
"Two couples" (total 4) everyone Bi,
would make for a most excellent family model.

there was a group in the 60's or 70's who tried that (sorry i dont know more specifics, i watched a documentary on it)

it was a dismal failure apparently.
 

blackout

Violet.
there was a group in the 60's or 70's who tried that (sorry i dont know more specifics, i watched a documentary on it)

it was a dismal failure apparently.

I'd be interested to see it actually,
but as for the outcome?
Most regualr monogamous marriages are dismal failures.
:shrug:

That's why we have serial polygamy.
(ie, divorce and remarriage)
 

strikeviperMKII

Well-Known Member
Personally I think polygamy would make for a more stable, happier, and secure family. I really like entertaining the idea of having two husbands and two wives together as one family unit.

We could go with the Denobulan model from Star Trek. Three wives for each husband, three husbands for each wife.

But I agree. More people does mean a bit more complexity, but still, we can learn to understand it, and be better for it.
 

tomato1236

Ninja Master
Instituting polygamy wouldn't change our society, except that dudes would then be sleeping around with their wives, rather than just with whomever is willing.

In seriousness, though, my wife would have a really really hard time if she had to share me. And I don't know that I would want to manage several wives.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
We could go with the Denobulan model from Star Trek. Three wives for each husband, three husbands for each wife.

But I agree. More people does mean a bit more complexity, but still, we can learn to understand it, and be better for it.

I think three couples is the limit. I personally prefer two, yet three can be manageable albeit pressing it a bit.

Past that number, I would think personal intimacy's would have a significant chance of faltering and destabilizing. One might as well then become swingers which isn't ultimately terrible on the sexual side of things, but it would not be good IMO for long term (special) relationships and rearing up children.
 
Top