Buttons*
Glass half Panda'd
I did actually but that's off topic *runs away*It`s really telling how none seem to actually confront your one simple point.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I did actually but that's off topic *runs away*It`s really telling how none seem to actually confront your one simple point.
I disagree... condoms as a strategy hinge on distribution and use, if you cannot distribute enough to meet demand(sometimes the case, as with people who use them while they have them, but don't abstain when they don't), or if people do not use them enough/consistently/at all the strategy in its current form fails.
Huh? Condoms as a strategy failing because people will have sex even when they don't have them is a failure of absitnence now?Which just illustrates (all the more) what a total failure the abstainance strategy is.
(as it hinges on people ACTUALLY being abstainant)
Why?I think it is very hard to take advice from someone who doesn't actively participate in something to give advice to others....
If you want to know the Church's stance on sex and condoms, then the Pope is the perfect person to ask... if you want to know how effective condoms are at preventing the spread of AIDS talk to a specialist in the area... at least one has been quoted here as supporting, in a way, the Pope...and if I want to know about sex, condoms and how effective they are at least get someone to tell me that is speaking from some sort of experience.....
The Pope isn't giving medical advice, he is giving moral guidance and noting the reality of the situation...Let the religious leaders stick to religion and leave the medical advice to the doctors....
The Pope isn't giving medical advice, he is giving moral guidance and noting the reality of the situation...
Some people think so, yes. I don't see why I must agree.
Besides, if I did, then it would be all the more reason not to condone his mistakes...
What the heck. He sure is disguising that fact well.
He looks like a pope you'd see in a Jack Chick tract, doesn't her?
Describing these pictures as bizarre....
would not be enough. :areyoucra :bat:
That's is problem here, the Pope addressed this message to Christians and we Christians do think that we must follow the dictates of God's laws and commandments. if you want to learn about the virtue of abstinence and it effectiveness. Who else would you consult? Surely one that practices this virtue, right? The Pope is an expert on this, this discussion is getting to muddle up, all that the article (news at that time) said is that abstinence is 100% effective in the control of the spreading of this virus, and that condoms aren't. What in green earth does this got to do with the subject of the thread? Would you lay down on the operating table and expect the Pope to do an appendectomy? No more than you would confess your sins to your doctor":areyoucraI don't think anyone should dictate to anyone what they should or should not do when it comes to sex, or the use of condoms. I think it is very hard to take advice from someone who doesn't actively participate in something to give advice to others....If I want to learn to ice skate then I want someone with experience to teach me, and if I want to know about sex, condoms and how effective they are at least get someone to tell me that is speaking from some sort of experience.........
Let the religious leaders stick to religion and leave the medical advice to the doctors............
Would you lay down on the operating table and expect the Pope to do an appendectomy? No more than you would confess your sins to your doctor....
But then if your doctor was tall, dark and handsome he might just be the sin you need to confess...
Off topic my dear fellow this discussion is about strategies, not unwanted prenancies, strategies that will help to slow down the spreading of HIV, the Pope counsel to Christians is abstain! and Hell will freeze over before the Pope will counsel a Christian to have sex regardless of been infected with HIV, condoms are not 100% effective, not as effective as the virtue of abstinence, they is not one chance that the Pope will participate in the promotions of irresponsibility and damnation, the Pope advertising condoms on TV? are you some kind of a nut? if "people are not stupid" what's the problem? If they have contracted HIV, they can be educated about the danger of contracting or infecting someone else, don't have sex with those that are known to be infected nor have sex with anyone (abstain) if you are infected, and Bob's your uncle.The Pope is confined by his religion and i am sure that if he could think for himself he would undoubtedly see the logic of condoms,asking people to abstain from sex is just unrealistic and naive and obviously comes from people who do not experience sex.
All the Pope needs to say is its ok to use a Condom,its that simple and leave the morals of it to each individual just as we have advertisments on the TV about responsible sex and using a Condom to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STDs ,people are not stupid,if they are shown the real facts they can make their own educated choice and not a load of gibberish.
Off topic my dear fellow this discussion is about strategies, not unwanted prenancies, strategies that will help to slow down the spreading of HIV, the Pope counsel to Christians is abstain! and Hell will freeze over before the Pope will counsel a Christian to have sex regardless of been infected with HIV, condoms are not 100% effective, not as effective as the virtue of abstinence, they is not one chance that the Pope will participate in the promotions of irresponsibility and damnation, the Pope advertising condoms on TV? are you some kind of a nut? if "people are not stupid" what's the problem? If they have contracted HIV, they can be educated about the danger of contracting or infecting someone else, don't have sex with those that are known to be infected nor have sex with anyone (abstain) if you are infected, and Bob's your uncle.
He looks like a pope you'd see in a Jack Chick tract, doesn't her?
Huh? Condoms as a strategy failing because people will have sex even when they don't have them is a failure of absitnence now?
Unfortunately, for your arguement that is, and once again, the only programs I have heard of that have success in reducing AIDS heavily emphasized a cultural change towards abstinence and faithfulness...
But Lucho you don't have to agree with the Pope, you are not Catholic,
I am starting to wonder, what is your interest in the free condoms campaign?
As a Christian I want to see the end of the spread of this virus and the Salvation of these people, there are no cures for this virus yet, but the work continues for one and also a preventive vaccination, so in this stage the most effective way is to teach the virtue of abstinence,
that is the Pope's position, that is his Church position as nobody can force you to become a Catholic, you don't have to agree with the highest authority in that faith, find another Church and another faith.
I am thinking in going back to the Catholic Church for their boldness in the preaching of Christianity tenets, they are not trying to become popular and compromise, for every vice that constantly disturbs our souls, there is a virtue that we must develop.
The Church won't accept you so this is a non-event.
And the Pope is not mistaken either abstinence works, and the Church is always there for those that are weak, to teach, to counsel to strengthen.
If you join his flock you will learn and believe the power of virtue, you will develop self-control.:shout
That's is problem here, the Pope addressed this message to Christians and we Christians do think that we must follow the dictates of God's laws and commandments.
if you want to learn about the virtue of abstinence and it effectiveness. Who else would you consult?
Surely one that practices this virtue, right? The Pope is an expert on this,
this discussion is getting to muddle up, all that the article (news at that time) said is that abstinence is 100% effective in the control of the spreading of this virus, and that condoms aren't.
We Christians believe that we are not of this world, that is what the master, Jesus taught, that is what the apostles, have you ever read a Bible?Christians do not live in a separate world. They do not have any less social impact than anyone else. They have no claim to privilege in this regard, no excuse to be mindless and engage in dangerous behaviors.
Maybe he is abstinent himself. That gives him no authority to decree that others should also be, even if true.
Abstinence is achievable and is commanded, if you are a Christian that through sin contracted the virus, repented and were forgiven you must atone for your sin, you must not remain sexually active, if you do you will not loose your Salvation.Now THAT is muddling the point. Abstinence is effective when it actually happens. For various social and even biological reasons that are having far less attention than they deserve, it very rarely does.
Condoms are effective. Feeling guilty from not abstaining from sex isn't. Except for a minority of people, attempting abstinence creates FAR more trouble than it avoids.