dawny0826
Mother Heathen
No, I'm not.
I'm sorry. I misunderstood your stance. I was under the impression that you were in favor of a ban.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I'm not.
Sure bothers me. The main reason I don't watch porn is that I'm pretty good at telling how people feel, and the women are obviously not enjoying themselves in almost all of it.
So, at what point did I mention pimps? Surely there are some individuals who work in the porn industry without pimps. Should they be punished for your agenda?
Obviously you don't understand who I consider a pimp. I don't care about porn producers or porn managers who are mostly white men who make male centric pornography.
Obviously you don't understand who I consider a pimp. I don't care about porn producers or porn managers who are mostly white men who make male centric pornography.
Which at what point refers to exploited women? Male-centered does not imply exploitation of women, as not all men desire a woman to be exploited. White men are not innately exploitative of women.
So, what are you on about, exactly?
Male-centric or phallocentric means
"Centred on men or on a male view point, especially one held to entail the domination of women by men"
phallocentric - definition of phallocentric by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Which at what point refers to exploited women? Male-centered does not imply exploitation of women, as not all men desire a woman to be exploited. White men are not innately exploitative of women.
So, what are you on about, exactly?
You've changed your wording to phallocentric. Nice tactic. Now, why are you demonizing the entire industry for your own agenda?
Just as a pimp exploits his prostitutes (gains unfairly from someone else's efforts), a porn producer exploits their actors.
An independent prostitute or porn actor who gains the entire proceeds of the work is perhaps not exploited, or at least not to the same degree.
You've changed your wording to phallocentric. Nice tactic. Now, why are you demonizing the entire industry for your own agenda?
I must say, this is a rather silly approach. Really? Accusing each other of sneaky hidden agendas? Is that necessary?
Eeerrrmmm that's what I've always meant by male-centric it's like another phrase for phallocentric:areyoucra
I agree, however you do not find anyone screaming to ban the film industry in its entirety for the exploitation of actors in general. Obviously not all managers exploit their actors sexually in the porn industry, and there are many forms of (apparently acceptable) exploitation.
I know the internet isn't a great communication tool, but from my point of view you seem quite upset and passionate about your opinion. More so than anybody you're debating with. So accusing others of screaming is kind of ironic.
I know the internet isn't a great communication tool, but from my point of view you seem quite upset and passionate about your opinion. More so than anybody you're debating with. So accusing others of screaming is kind of ironic.
That would imply you see men as nothing more than a phallus.
:areyoucra what!? I really don't have this much patience
I've a theory about that.....but it won't be popular here.I agree, however you do not find anyone screaming to ban the film industry in its entirety for the exploitation of actors in general. Obviously not all managers exploit their actors sexually in the porn industry, and there are many forms of (apparently acceptable) exploitation.
Just as a pimp exploits his prostitutes (gains unfairly from someone else's efforts), a porn producer exploits their actors.
An independent prostitute or porn actor who gains the entire proceeds of the work is perhaps not exploited, or at least not to the same degree.