I'd always sensed that you're a man's man!I dont, and my testicles seem to be intact.
(All three of them)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd always sensed that you're a man's man!I dont, and my testicles seem to be intact.
(All three of them)
I'd always sensed that you're a man's man!
Oh how the tides have turned.For once, I get to rub some faux liberal noses in their conservatism.
Such is purifemunism, by whose adherents the badge of "liberal" is worn undeservedly.Oh how the tides have turned.
I am actually quite surprised, I never knew some of our more bleeding heart "liberals" were actually so conservative.
I dont, and my testicles seem to be intact.
(All three of them)
Maybe that happens with children who act on movies.
Hw do you know they are not being exploited by their parents? Yet the fruit of their labor is there, for everyone to get their fix of drama while they only wanted to play and do homework like normal children.
How dare you watch tv with child actors?
Supernumery testicles is known as "supersticles".:areyoucra. Word of advice here buddy but I think that may not be what you think it is. It may be cancer.
And this is the same as rape how?
:areyoucra. Word of advice here buddy but I think that may not be what you think it is. It may be cancer.
Supernumery testicles is known as "supersticles".
It's a rare but envied condition.
Ferrihydrite.
And this is the same as rape how?
How is filming consenting adults having sex together the same as rape?
That sounds like an extremely gross exaggeration. What's your evidence?
In any case, taking the right away from. Women to do what they want with their bodies for money when they are not hurting anyone is not empowering anyone. Equally so with men.
Porn is not bad in itself.
So anyone who isn't self-employed is being exploited?
She takes all porn as rape unless there is evidence( for the random viewer) of the consent of the actress apparently.
Ya know what I love about threads like this? It really separates the "true" liberals (ie, libertarians) from the "modern" liberals (ie, progressive statists).
The latter are all in favor of abortion because: "A woman should control her own body, not the government! Hands off my uterus!". But as soon as a
woman gets too independent, & begins to earn some honest coin by controlling her body without harming anyone else (not even a fetus), they're all:
"Women are victims! They can't be trusted to make this decision!" For once, I get to rub some faux liberal noses in their conservatism.
That is my point exactly. I do not believe a woman would go on a camera and be boinked because she doesn't like it or feel exploited. I am being sarcastic about exploitation.
It seems to be a viewpoint of some feminist that women are empowered by porn although some say the reverse. Empowerment is felt by the individual but in reality men just look down on pornographic actresses. So on a certain level I do not see how it can empower anybody unless the female is ignorant about how men view her.
But if a girl feels empowered by looking like a whore on screen then all power to them
They're not hurting anyone? Seriously? What about themselves?