• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Prejudice against Qur'an.

Unification

Well-Known Member
Wow, a lot of word salad and no dressing, that is no way even addresses the context of the topic you replied to.

Perhaps the dressing was bitter and distasteful to you.

It's a radically different dressing that you may not be used to hearing due to the common perception that "they" taught different things.

You're adament about de-conditioning minds of mythology yet do not understand it is the same thing as de-conditioning perceptions. Being liberated and set free from conditioning.
 

CATSISS

Catsiss The Catheart
It's easy to see it that way when viewed literally and historically.

I see the same goals, with different language and words used... go to war within and destroy and eradicate everything in mind that causes suffering and harm..deny those things, after that liberation/salvation/freedom from suffering occurs. One going from hell(suffering) to happiness(heaven.) One going from an enslaved mind to a free mind.
Same paths and ways.

It's difficult to decondition the mind due to how instilled and how the crowd and majority has taught such about Jesus, Buddah, and Muhammad. Destroying our own perceptions are painful, while the rebuilding/altering is painless. Man has this compulsive need to see everything literal and historical and make exoteric images out of everything and anything with texts that never happened literally or historically and are mythological.
Also even if they didnt exist look just how many things they have done to this world lets say that fool muhamad is fake so what?muslims are still goin to believe that fool.
 

Unification

Well-Known Member
Buddha actually taught to even sacrafice ourselves to any beings animals,plants 0r whatever,while muhammad ****s a goat,underaged child and basically slay evryone(im an atheist not buddhist)

It is only perceived as slaying literal people if one perceives it that way.

I see it as abstract mental slaying. Sacrifice can also be abstract mental slaying.

It is only perceived as mans common definition of marriage if perceived that way. Again, slaying this perception.

It is only seen as literal and historical if perceived that way. Again, slaying this perception.

One only slays and sacrifices these mental perceptions within themselves.
 

Unification

Well-Known Member
Also even if they didnt exist look just how many things they have done to this world lets say that fool muhamad is fake so what?muslims are still goin to believe that fool.

Mankind has actually done that to this world because their own mental world's are vile. Their own mental world's need slayed/eradicated and altered. False perception becoming true perception through de-conditioning all of these common perceptions about the mythological texts.
 

CATSISS

Catsiss The Catheart
It is only perceived as slaying literal people if one perceives it that way.

I see it as abstract mental slaying. Sacrifice can also be abstract mental slaying.

It is only perceived as mans common definition of marriage if perceived that way. Again, slaying this perception.

It is only seen as literal and historical if perceived that way. Again, slaying this perception.

One only slays and sacrifices these mental perceptions within themselves.
Since both of them are nonsense i still stand with science,but if i have to choose i would choose buddhism over that cruel ******* islam
 

Unification

Well-Known Member
maybe younger. we don't know, the whole 9 is like what they state to make it more publically acceptable.

Why is this literal and historical but the rest mythology and fanatical?

It would seem that a literal guy marrying/sleeping with a literal young girl is also mythological and fanatical, yet you adhere to it as not and say "we don't know."

If you don't know, why assume this is literal and historical? The only explanation would be a very assumptive imagination.
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
Did Christian Extremists or Christians linked to Terrorism threaten the makers of the video? It strange that they deleted.
The video is still up. You can find it in youtube by searching "Holy Quran Experiment".

I gues they received threats from Christian Terrorist Groups.
I doubt it. Typically such groups would be happy the more people know about the Bible, even the bad parts.
 
Top