Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was involved in more than a few demonstrations in the late sixties and early seventies where the demonstration leadership took their responsibility to deal with provocateurs very seriously. We're seeing an unfortunate failure to do so -- or, even, to understand the importance of doing so.What happened?
Hear, hear! Demonstrators behaving badly need to be stopped as quickly as possible, by anyone observing their misbehavior. They're undermining goals of the demo and turning the public against the demonstrators.I was involved in more than a few demonstrations in the late sixties and early seventies where the demonstration leadership took their responsibility to deal with provocateurs very seriously. We're seeing an unfortunate failure to do so -- or, even, to understand the importance of doing so.
It shows all the characteristics of a highly heterogenous and highly immature protest movement.
Just a note: I've encountered both provocateurs and police 'infiltrators' butHear, hear! Demonstrators behaving badly need to be stopped as quickly as possible, by anyone observing their misbehavior. They're undermining goals of the demo and turning the public against the demonstrators.
Agents provocateurs and police infiltration, alas, seems inevitable. Be on the lookout.
Agreed.Just a note: I've encountered both provocateurs and police 'infiltrators' but
- there is typically a world of difference between the two, and
- in my experience, provocateurs are more problematic by far.
Peaceful protest does not include destruction and takeovers of property that they do not own.What happened?
I'm pro neither side. Both Israelis and and Palistinians have been behaving badly.
Define "takeover."Peaceful protest does not include destruction and takeovers of property that they do not own.
Israel has a history of repression and disproportionate retaliation toward Gaza's history of ineffectual, symbolic strike-backs. It's a vicious cycle that makes both sides look bad.Parenthetically ...
The attacks began early on 7 October with a barrage of at least 3,000 rockets launched against Israel and vehicle-transported and powered paraglider incursions into Israel.[25][26] Hamas fighters breached the Gaza–Israel barrier, attacking military bases and massacring civilians in Gaza envelope Kibbutz settlements, including in Be'eri, Kfar Aza, and Nir Oz, and at the Nova music festival.[27][28] The attackers killed 1,139 people:[f] 695 Israeli civilians (including 36 children), 71 foreign nationals, and 373 members of the security forces.[g][33] About 250 Israeli civilians and soldiers were taken as hostages to the Gaza Strip, including 30 children, with the stated goal to force Israel to exchange them for imprisoned Palestinians, including women and children.[34][35][36][37] Reports of rape and sexual assault also emerged. Hamas officials denied the involvement of their fighters.[38][39][40][41] [source]
Israel is marking day 207. Hostages remain. Some are still alive.
Look...I assure you that the story of "the land which was taken from us" is not that credible any more. Since decades now.Israel has a history of repression and disproportionate retaliation toward Gaza's history of ineffectual, symbolic strike-backs. It's a vicious cycle that makes both sides look bad.
That way, some powerful country (like Russia or China for instance) could take someone's territory and hold it for 80 years. After that is it theirs?Look...I assure you that the story of "the land which was taken from us" is not that credible any more. Since decades now.
My country had the territories of Dalmatia and Istria.
The Croatians chased Italians away from those lands. In a very violent way. Many Italians were thrown into deep sinkholes on the ground called foibes. Now, after 80 years, we love Croatians. We have forgiven them.
As they forgave us for what fascism may have done in those land.
So the story "but A did this to me 80 years ago, or B did this to me 40 years ago" ....well...it doesn't work any more.
Istria belonged to Italians since the times of the Romans.That way, some powerful country (like Russia or China for instance) could take someone's territory and hold it for 80 years. After that is it theirs?
The EU ensures peace and justice among nations.I think any injustices done post WWII need to be redressed or mitigated in some way (that date being when the UN was established).
Istria was made part of Yugoslavia after WWII, so it makes sense that Croatia has it now.Istria belonged to Italians since the times of the Romans.
Now Croatians have it. Yes. It has become theirs after 80 years.
So what?
It was traumatic, but the Italian refugees have moved on. They have had a closure.
The EU ensures peace and justice among nations.
What I meant is that this conflict is not about land. It's about religion.Istria was made part of Yugoslavia after WWII, so it makes sense that Croatia has it now.