A.K.A. Bush-ism.Perhaps he/she confused it for the Republican Party manifesto...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A.K.A. Bush-ism.Perhaps he/she confused it for the Republican Party manifesto...
Atoms are not six sided in the quantum sence either.That was quantum physics not atomic physics
Help!!!
inside Atoms are quantums, Quantums have 6 points according to research...please check Harvard or other universities and don't make me go finding you references for something so simple.
Yes, wizanda, you do indeed need "Help!!!" For something so simple you should have no trouble citing a credible reference.Help!!!
inside Atoms are quantums, Quantums have 6 points according to research...please check Harvard or other universities and don't make me go finding you references for something so simple.
I took a portion of my time in life and devoted it to studying evolution, i like to wiegh propabilities, look at the odds, and see if it is possible in any case.
My beleif- The Theory of Evolution is False, although some creatures do change over time, but not in a evolutionary way.
I was standing outside by my house and i saw a tree. Where does a tree come from? From a seed? and the seed comes from a tree? Which came first? What is the chance that the tree just happened to have roots, that happened to know how to obsorbed water, and the tree happened to have a trunk, which happened to know how to transfer water to the leaves, and it just happened to have leaves, that knew how to obsorbed light from the sun, and it just happened to know how to store it, and so on, and so on.
To beleive in evolution is to believe that almost everything "just happened." Evolution cannot explain the begining. At what point did something exist? Did all things come from that same Big Bang point? What chance was there that life would arise out of all of this?
I would have to agree that often times man does think of God in human terms, anthropomorphism I think its called. In our inability to understand a concept like God we tend to think of God as a thing, we ponder whether or not God or gods or a creator exist thereby seperating God and existence as if existence where a property that God either has or does not have. Ifwhen we think of an eternal creator responsibly for all that exists and is responsible for maintaining that existence, as many religions belive, then we cannot seperate God from existence. We must say that God does not exist, God is existence thereby eliminating the confusion. So even if there is an eternal multiverse (which I think takes about as much faith to believe in as God) then if God is existence then all things that are, including an infinite number of universes, exist because they partake somehow in existence. So beleiving in the existence of an eternal multiverse does not eliminate the need for existence. And with an understanidng of God that is not made in man's image, seperated from existrence that is, then it would seem that the multiverse theory does not eliminate the need for God or a creator in that sense.
I took a portion of my time in life and devoted it to studying evolution, i like to wiegh propabilities, look at the odds, and see if it is possible in any case.
I took a portion of my time in life and devoted it to studying evolution, i like to wiegh propabilities, look at the odds, and see if it is possible in any case.
My beleif- The Theory of Evolution is False, although some creatures do change over time, but not in a evolutionary way.
I was standing outside by my house and i saw a tree. Where does a tree come from? From a seed? and the seed comes from a tree? Which came first? What is the chance that the tree just happened to have roots, that happened to know how to obsorbed water, and the tree happened to have a trunk, which happened to know how to transfer water to the leaves, and it just happened to have leaves, that knew how to obsorbed light from the sun, and it just happened to know how to store it, and so on, and so on.
To beleive in evolution is to believe that almost everything "just happened." Evolution cannot explain the begining. At what point did something exist? Did all things come from that same Big Bang point? What chance was there that life would arise out of all of this?
I think a higher power had to certianly have a hand in the matter. You can take a lump of clay and a potters wheel and expect those two things to evolve into a work of art. It takes something to mold it into being. This is the case for God.
Thanks!Welcome to the Forum, Daquine!
There are tens of hundreds of books that will tell you just how easily your "case for God" is refuted. A recent one is "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins. But any introductory level textbook in philosophy that has a section on arguments for creationism and/or intelligent design will help you understand why your argument holds no water.
Wondering is a very good thing, and these are all very good questions. The problem comes in the next paragraph where you seem to stop wondering and stop looking for answers to these questions. Once you decide that the only answer you require is God did it then the is no need to wonder further. But if on the other hand you are honestly wondering how sexual reproduction evolved then you should do some research on the topic.One way I look at it is, if you think about it, life as we know it works together a little "too" perfectly.
As an example, take male and females of many species, including us, humans. Let's look at reproduction. It makes me wonder how evolution would create two sexes of the same species, and thus allowing a male and female from that species to basically do the wild thing, and conceive offspring, thus insuring another generation of life, and their species.
Now what I'm wondering is, how would evolution be able to come up with something like that? Why not just make every species asexual? And even then with asexuality, how would evolution be able to come up with such complicated and complex ways to create offsrping?
I think a higher power had to certianly have a hand in the matter. You can take a lump of clay and a potters wheel and expect those two things to evolve into a work of art. It takes something to mold it into being. This is the case for God.
Sexual reproduction is better at adapting to surrounding environments and allows the spreading/mixing of genetic material. Asexual reproduction has very little in the way of defending against deleterious mutations.Daquine said:As an example, take male and females of many species, including us, humans. Let's look at reproduction. It makes me wonder how evolution would create two sexes of the same species, and thus allowing a male and female from that species to basically do the wild thing, and conceive offspring, thus insuring another generation of life, and their species.
Now what I'm wondering is, how would evolution be able to come up with something like that? Why not just make every species asexual? And even then with asexuality, how would evolution be able to come up with such complicated and complex ways to create offsrping?
Those are some intersting theories on the sepeartion of sex in species. I guess we'll never truely know the answers to these. Well, at least, not until we all bite the bucket and die. Then we'll know for sure. lol
You will most certainly find out if there's an afterlife, at least.My dear Daquine, what makes you so sure you get any answers after death? Suppose you find out no more after death than you do in life?