If a christian were to ask muslims about their view of Jesus, the man who's teachings is the foundation of christianity according to christians, they would come to hear that muslims love and respect Jesus as much as they do. There are differences as to what he's said and done, but in the end, no muslim tries to defame Jesus.
If a jew were to ask muslims of their view of Moses, the man who's teachings is the foundation of Judaism, he/she would come to learn that the muslims love and respect Moses as well and never ever try to defame him.
But when the tables are turned and we ask the jews or christians their view of Muhammad, the same respect to Muhammad is practically never given. Hmmm?
Why should Chrisitans and Jews give much respect to a man who taught many ideas that ran counter to their own?
The Prophet said, "We have more claim to Moses than you." Do you think that Muhammad was being particularly respectful to Jews by making such an outlandish claim? Likewise, it isn't likely that Christians who see Jesus Christ as God, in the flesh, feel terribly respected to be told that Jesus is a mere prophet and to top the insult, second to Muhammad himself.
The Western media portrays islam as anything but a religion of peace and that this can be found in the qur'an and sunnah.
Along with hoards of other less than thrilling comments as well. Aside from this it is worthy to note what the Islamic definition of "peace" is here.
But if one were to ask for those references, they bring up afghanistan, pakistan, and other situations that happen within muslim countries. In other words, the request for proof from authentic sources is ignored.
Actually Fatihah, it is because Muslims reference sources that are not widely recognized outside of the Islamic world as being authentic or authorative.
But when the muslim counters with the same logic and talks about the history and problems within the West, the muslims are accused of pointing the finger. Hmmm?
That does happen, yes, but it is usually the result of flawed arguments on the Muslim side of the point. For example, Muslims in general terms, do not seem to appreciate logical fallacies.
Questions are ignored and the respect to Muhammad is not given from the members of other religions, despite the fact that muslims give love and respect to their religious figures.
Actually, history proves you wrong on this point. The truth is that Islam doesn't tolerate other religious viewpoints because Islam is the only true religion.
So what can be concluded from this? This is certainly some sort of propaganda against islam.
Yes, sadly there is, but Fatihah, any religious group can make such a claim - Islam is not alone in this area and if there is a spotlight on Islam at this time in space it is because some less than thrilling Muslims have drawn the attention to them.
But why is this propaganda necessary, especially if islam is alleged to be a flawed religion? Let's have a dialogue.
That's the beauty of the reality, Fatihah. I don't believe that propaganda IS necessary. I believe that if we simply let Muslims talk, no one will ever need to say anything against them as the truth will quickly become obvious.