Is that you?
The guy looks pretty hot.
I'd do him. If I weren't married.
Even if he does drink Rocky Mountain buffalo ****.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is that you?
Ah, a non sequitur served with a side of irony.I see I'm dealing with sex crazed pagans. I'm sure you all advocate prostitution and drug use as well.
Welcome to the trailer park section of RF.
You'd be surprised how many people argue that their vague supernatural concept, "personhood", takes precedence over science.The question never really was about life either,
You'd be surprised how many people argue that their vague supernatural concept, "personhood", takes precedence over science.
Or maybe you wouldn't.
Tom
Ah, a non sequitur served with a side of irony.
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — A proposed bill in the Alabama Legislature would require all men in the state to get a vasectomy within one month of their 50th birthday or the birth of their third biological child, whichever comes first.
HB-238 was proposed by Rep. Rolanda Hollis Thursday.
Proposed bill would require men in Alabama to get vasectomy
...Can someone please explain what the meaning of this is?
Dunno. However, without doing any research I can guarantee you that some idiotic Democrat came up with it.
Most libertarians also support legalizing those things. If it's someone else, if there are no victims, then there should be no laws against it as at that point its probably legeslated morality. And that has got to go.I see I'm dealing with sex crazed pagans. I'm sure you all advocate prostitution and drug use as well.
Maybe so.Dunno. However, without doing any research I can guarantee you that some idiotic Democrat came up with it.
Have you not been reading the thread or OP article?Dunno. However, without doing any research I can guarantee you that some idiotic Democrat came up with it.
Most libertarians also support legalizing those things. If it's someone else, if there are no victims, then there should be no laws against it as at that point its probably legeslated morality. And that has got to go.
The only idiots are those who thought it was serious legislation; It was made to lampoon an anti-abortion bill.Dunno. However, without doing any research I can guarantee you that some idiotic Democrat came up with it.
If republicans truly gave a damn, why would they oppose things that would help prevent unwanted pregnancies, like sex ed and birth control, or cut funding for social programs that help struggling mothers? It isn't about life. It's about control.There's a human being at stake, that's the victim.
That's what I've heard. To me, Republicans have basically always been poor hating bafoons who especially love conservative Christian morality as allowable exemptions to their fantasy of small government and claiming the government is the problem while not getting out of the way and not bothering to apply this when it comes to women, science, war, drugs, and personal lives. After all, the president Rep when I was born was so unconvinced of his bs he let uncle Sam prop up "freedom fighters" who would become terrorists, some of whom would carry out 9/11. Reagan seems to have made a self fulfilling prophecy of his own words about how the government is the problem.Maybe so.
But I remember when the Republican party was about small, minimally intrusive, government.
Boy, things have changed.
Haven't they?
Tom
Of course not.Have you not been reading the thread or OP article?
Yes, baby I called it, because outside the body it is not a fetus - maybe it is??The "what" won't survive without the mother....?
The fetus has no self awareness, and is, no matter how you look at it, a burden and drain on the mothers body. This is something that should always be her choice. And, honestly, if a woman gets an abortion as birth control (something no doctor supports) or as a convenience, do you really want her to be a mother?There's a human being at stake, that's the victim.
It is not religious, when modern science intervenes there is a chance of survival. But if left to its own devices it will not survive.Don't you realize how religious this is?
By the standards of the Bible a baby wasn't alive until s/he drew a breath. Modern science proves differently.
Tom
Of course the article is too afraid to put Democrat by her name.MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — A proposed bill in the Alabama Legislature would require all men in the state to get a vasectomy within one month of their 50th birthday or the birth of their third biological child, whichever comes first.
HB-238 was proposed by Rep. Rolanda Hollis Thursday.
Proposed bill would require men in Alabama to get vasectomy
...Can someone please explain what the meaning of this is?
We do live in the Trump administration era.Stupid people elect stupid people i guess.