It depends how omnipotent is defined. The prophets have said, God does what He wills, and He ordains what He please.
Can God make a heavy stone, that He wont be able to move it?
Can God make a circle with three sides and three angles?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It depends how omnipotent is defined. The prophets have said, God does what He wills, and He ordains what He please.
Can God make a heavy stone, that He wont be able to move it?
Do you think at Matthew 10:34-36 Jesus was talking about a literal actual sword ?_____
Not meaning taking up literal violence against another - John 13:34-35
An omnibenevolent God wouldn't have let Satan sucker Him into smiting a guy just to see what would happen. Even GOD admits it's wrong in that book.In the case of both Job and Jesus the conclusion of the matter ended up better than the beginning.
Unless I want to chase people out of a church gift shop with a bull whip or mow over a tree because it didn't have fruit on it or kill an entire herd of livestock that doesn't belong to me or threaten child-abusers with hanging millstones around their necks or threatening global genocide when the problem I came to fix doesn't work out like I wanted or ...Jesus too shared the ' key concept of non-violent faith '
Yup. And other actual (as well as metaphorical) weapons.
I disagree.
An omnibenevolent God wouldn't have let Satan sucker Him into smiting a guy just to see what would happen. Even GOD admits it's wrong in that book.
Unless I want to chase people out of a church gift shop with a bull whip or mow over a tree because it didn't have fruit on it or kill an entire herd of livestock that doesn't belong to me or threaten child-abusers with hanging millstones around their necks or threatening global genocide when the problem I came to fix doesn't work out like I wanted or ...
In Bahai view, everytime a true Messenger of God has appeared, He confirmed previous Messengers, and also Promised of a future Manifestation.
Jesus too shared the ' key concept of non-violent faith '- Matthew 26:52; Revelation 13:10; John 13:34-35
After first-century Christianity ended, ' Christendom ' ( so-called Christian mostly in name only ) ignored Jesus' non-violent command - Matthew 7:21-23
Christendom often uses the pulpit as a recruiting station so parents will sacrifice their young on the Altar of War.
Christendom often promotes a political agenda in the name of Christ over Christ's concept of a non-violent faith agenda.
Since Jesus did NOT advocate the use of literal swords ( weapons ) for his followers, then his followers would NOT lift up sword against another.
There is a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.
What King Solomon ( who was known for his wisdom ) wrote at Ecclesiastes 3 was for the nation of ancient Israel.
They went to war sometimes for right reasons, sometimes for wrong reasons.
Since Pentecost, the Christian congregation is Not under the Constitution of the Mosaic Law.
Christians are under the ' Law of Christ ' -> Galatians 6:2; Hebrews 7:12; 1 Corinthians 9:21
The ' Law of Christ ' is called the 'perfect law' that belongs to freedom. Freedom from the temporary Mosaic Law - James 1:25; James 2:12; Romans 3:27
That ' new law ' or ' new covenant ' was foretold through Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:6-13
The ' Law of Christ ' covers one's whole life style which now includes the putting down of carnal weapons in favor of spiritual weapons - Ephesians 6:11-17; 2 Corinthians 10:4
Christians fulfill what Isaiah 2:4 and Micah 4:3 wrote would happen.
That's one interpretation.
There are always people and, in fact, whole religions that seem put a lot of value in attempting to disregard the differences among religions.
Thoughts?
How else would one interpret 2 Corinthians 10:4 ?
Jesus spoke at different times of both 'physical' and spiritual weapons. They each have their place in the Battle with Satan and their servants.
Satan and his demons are heavenly/spirit persons, so physical weapons are ineffective - Revelation 12:7-9
The battle with Satan and his servants will be taken out by the executional words coming our of Jesus' mouth - Revelation 19:14-16; Isaiah 11:3-4; Jeremiah 25:31-33
Please notice there are No people, No physical/carnal weapons, but heavenly angelic armies used as mentioned at Revelation 19:14
But Satan and their demons can take human form. Moreover, Satan has human servants too.
According to Scripture, the taking of human form is: past tense.
Those materialized human bodies were destroyed in the Flood.
Since the Flood those demons are in symbolic ' chains ' of darkness - Jude 1:6
That 'dark state' is Not biblical hell (grave), but from the Greek ' tatato'o' (tatarus)
So, since the Flood the demons do Not take human form, but yes, Satan does have human servants:
Notice who the 'father' is at John 8:44. see also Acts of the Apostles 13:10 and 1 Peter 5:8
According to God, Who (I believe) speaks to me, this is not just something that happened in the past, it still happens. And I (believe I) have interacted with demons in human form.
If you believe Satan has human servants, then surely it is at least reasonable that it might sometimes be necessary to use 'physical' weapons against them?