• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Proved: Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. is mentioned in the Bible

Dawood Ahmad

Lol its me. Time to debate
Muhammad is 100% not mentioned in the Bible. You might be able to stretch words and meanings in order to fit him in, but it is very misleading to claim that Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible. The future "prophet" mentioned in the Bible could just as easily be Joseph Smith, who started the Morman Church.
Just answer my questions instead of being emotional
What are the new things?
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
I apologize to the members of Brothers
I want to ask our friend, a Muslim
dawoodahmad11
writer of this issue following question and answer it in one word (yes ) or (no )
So that we can continue this dialogue
Because without this question Mode dialog be infertile
1. The question is
( Is the gospel which is now in the hands of Christians, and that was in the hands of Christians during the reign of Mohammed ( right ) ???
2. In other words
Do you think that the Gospel distortion, or it is not any distortion ?????
Wait for an answer from you without winding or rotation only one word
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
to-dawoodahmad11
Muslims say that the Gospel which is in the hands of the Christian Gospel typeface and void ???
This talk Muslims ???
2. If the words of the Gospel in vain
3. You may not be relied upon to prove the prophecy of Prophet ???
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
to -dawoodahmad11
That's what the law says
1. You want to prove the prophecy of Prophet Muhammad of the Gospel
2. So you have to recognize the people in front of it's true book
And there is no distortion ??
3. You may not be proof of a book or guide does not recognize
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
And now offer you other evidence to prove that your word is not true
1. Muhammad was known Gospel
2. was in Mecca, a Christian school called (Alencranih)
This is not a complete Christian
3. There is a priest in Mecca was vulturous
A cousin named Muhammad (Arca Ibn Nawfal)
4. The book was translated to Mohammed
5. if Mohammed knew any talk of his prophecy of this book, it was announced by us
6. fraud is to invite Muhammad was a prophet
7. Mohammed was studying the book until it becomes a priest Nsrenaa
8. Muslims kept his hair from the beard Mohammed existed in Mecca
Why not give us their version of the gospel message, which supports the alleged prophet J ???
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
Handwritten by Usman PBUH is Ok
Do you want to present the Koran says is the original ???
You do not know anything ???
1. Othman Ibn Affan Muslim Caliph
2. This Caliph thirty burned a copy of the Aqrank
3. The existing version is the version of the Ottoman
4. Koran in its original version written in Arabic script, which does not have points on the characters
5. This is a very big problem
6. who put points on the Arabic letters is the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik Ibn Marwan
7. Here is a big problem
8. Muslim says that the original copy of the Koran is in heaven in the archives board in the sky
9 = OK (Is that version heavenly words written by an Arab points) or written Arabic words which no points (
Wait answer you
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
Well -
Christ said ( false prophets will come calling my name )
He also said ( by their fruits you shall know them )
2. if the fruits of Muhammad peace and love
The words correctly
3. But the fruits of Prophet Mohammed is terrorism and fighting and the blood and the spoils of war, women and money and slaves
4 - I considered the leader of India's Jawaharlal Nehru
Better than a prophet Mohammed because he was a leader peacefully
5. If you told me of follow Jawaharlal Nehru or Mohammed
6. I Will Follow Jawaharlal Nehru and considered a prophet carrying the message of peace
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
1. Where does it say this in the Bible? 2nd coming is Jesus again, not another person, unless you can show me a passage I don't know about.
2. Why does this 2nd prophet have to be Muhammad? Why couldn't it be said that the other prophet hasn't come yet?
3. Why do you think the Bible is accurate when it comes to this?

My point is that all of these assumptions are matters of faith. They are huge jumps.
They are using deception ???
1. recognized that the Gospel typeface and void say ??
2. He wants to prove Nabih prophecy of this book falsehood ? J
3. ( being built on falsehood is invalid )
This is a legal base
For this fall call this Muslim
4. Only if I admit that our Bible and the Torah are correct
5. then we can dialogue with him according to the mentality of sound standards
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
They are using deception ???
1. recognized that the Gospel typeface and void say ??
2. He wants to prove Nabih prophecy of this book falsehood ? J
3. ( being built on falsehood is invalid )
This is a legal base
For this fall call this Muslim
4. Only if I admit that our Bible and the Torah are correct
5. then we can dialogue with him according to the mentality of sound standards
??
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
I believe this is as far from the truth as one can get. I don't deal in fantasies and it does make sense in arguing about someone's intellectual perambulations but I will give it a shot. There is absolutely no evidence of Mohammed in the Bible. There is no evidence that the verses that Mohammedans like to think are corrupt are really corrupt.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
All right, folks. I think we should lay off him for a while. We've given him enough to answer for; let's not bombard the poor kid. He won't know where to begin.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
There is absolutely no evidence of Mohammed in the Bible

Agreed.

There is no evidence that the verses that Mohammedans like to think are corrupt are really corrupt.

I think corrupt is a bad word to use here. More like not understanding how the books were written and perceived to have errors, based on personal interpretation.

Theology is easy to take out of context.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Is this not tis like taking a band aid off slow, instead of fast?

I see what you're saying, but if we want to have a fair debate we should at least let him answer the questions and give him a chance to speak.
 
Top