Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
This is quite telling.
I find everything to be telling.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This is quite telling.
I'm sorry Dr. Sheldon Cooper, I never realised you were on RF!
Oh and for the record:
Sounds to me like you can't handle sex. That's not intended as an insult by the way.
Get a good game and you're on.
Don't feel too bad about the questions. I'm on the opposite end of the spectrum, that for me sex is my favorite thing in the world. I've even contemplated frequently how the orgasm is the physical and mental equivalent to enlightenment.
FWIW, I don't think you're a bad person for your asexuality. You know yourself and your personal boundaries, and you live your life.
Three words..... Metal Gear Solid!
If the orgasm was equivalent to enlightenment then I am sure every pornstar would qualify as the new reincarnation as Buddha . I do admit the thought brings amusement to me.
My boundaries usually end on the phrase "do you want to go out sometime".
I imagine after the first several times, the allure and fascination would wear off. As long as they aren't, like, hitting on your kids or something, or snuck into a kindergarten playground specifically during recess or something.
But what if someone was masturbating in public and smiling at children while they were doing it?
I'm not sure how masturbating mid-street qualifies as a public display of affection. We generally ascribe 'pedo' to someone who would wag their flag at children.
I'm not sure how masturbating mid-street qualifies as a public display of affection. We generally ascribe 'pedo' to someone who would wag their flag at children.
I was thinking the same thing. That is would qualify the same as a woman flashing her breasts. I don't consider the latter to be a public display of affection, and neither would masturbating in public.
Like I said, it doesn't bother me. I could not really case less, and I have no kids and have no intentions of having kids ever. However society wishes to treat to issue is of very little consequence to me.
I think there is a clear line of some form of couple or perhaps a couple more people, who are trying to pull something in a public place, in hopes of not getting caught, because it's exhilarating to them, and people who are harassing others with their genitals.
Ok, I was thinking along the lines of it being legal and becoming normalised in society, how far should it be allowed to go and in what public spaces. Just for the record I wouldn't have a problem with catching a couple having sex in public either.
Well, I think society is going to be okay. Sex is fun and all, but it ain't that great. Plus everyone has to be at work.
Various scientists -- mainly anthropologists -- have pointed out that humans seem to have a nearly universal taboo against public copulation. That taboo is so pervasive among human cultures that it calls for explanation. And I am aware of at least two or three theories that seek to explain it.
To me, the most plausible of those theories is that humans have taboos against public copulation in order to protect against sexual jealousies destroying communal bonds. I don't know if that's right, but it seems the most plausible of the theories I've heard.
Please note: the fact some people -- a relatively few -- break taboos is not usually an argument against the existence of taboos.
Are those taboos innate? I.e. how long have they been around? At what point in human history did it become not ok to root in front of others? Other animals do it all the time? When did humans decide it wasn't ok?
I feel like it's become a taboo only relatively recently in the grand scheme of human history