• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question about 28:4 to Muslim posters

The sorcerers in the battle against Musa aleyhi salaam were from Bani Israel.

Sorcerers appear quite a lot in the Islamic tradition.

What makes someone a sorcerer and what powers do they have? Who powers their magic, Shaytan and Jinn? What evidence is required to convict someone of sorcery in Islamic Law?
 

TG123456

Active Member
Salaam Alaikum, TashaN and FearGod. I will be gone all day, will respond to your posts on Friday or Saturday.

Masalaam :)
 

TG123456

Active Member
lol, you can claim whatever you want. Prophet Mohamed already fulfilled his message to us. The rest is not important.
Don't get me wrong. I am not claiming he pretended to be dead. I am saying though that such a claim makes as much sense as stating that Jesus did not die on the cross.

But we already have established that there is a reasonable doubt on whether he died or not since they didn't break his legs and they had to take him down from the cross quickly before sunset.
Similar doubt can be cast on anyone's death, including the deaths of people that the Quran claims have died in the way they did.

If they did break His legs, we could still cast doubt by saying that God could have magically healed them.

One of the Roman soldier stabbed Jesus in the side with a spear. Do you think that after a horrendous day of whippings and torture and finally the agonizing pain of being on a cross for a few hours, He would have been more or less likely to survive?

That's not what the verse says, that's just one of the interpretations. Ask any Arabic speaker to read the verse for you. It says "it was made to appear to them", it doesn't say another replaced him.

{157} وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا الْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَكِنْ شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ وَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ لَفِي شَكٍّ مِنْهُ مَا لَهُمْ بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا اتِّبَاعَ الظَّنِّ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًا
That they said (in boast), "We killed Al-Masih 'Isa the son of Maryam, the Messenger of Allah"; but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.
I wasn't pointing out what you underlined, but the fragment before, that Jesus was not crucified.

The Bible does make it very clear Jesus was nailed to a cross, even if you want to speculate that because His legs were broken, He was alive. The Quran does not confirm what the Bible says about Jesus having been crucified.

Thank you for acknowledging that. It means they will just judge with what they "saw", meaning what "it was made to appeared to them", not what actually happened. Why don't we ask Jesus himself what happened then? you think there is a way to do that?
There is no way to ask Jesus, since He is in Heaven. You stated that the disciples who wrote the Gospels judged by what they saw, that is true. Do you then doubt their reports of Jesus raising the dead?

They also judged by what they heard. Do you doubt that Jesus said that the Father is His God?

Are you sure you want to go down this route? ;)

It's just a belief, not a fact, and as you admitted before, people can appear to be dead but they might not be dead in reality. Like when you mentioned that Prophet Mohamed might not have died before putting him in the grave, lol.
... or the Pharaoh drowning. He could have survived the waves, if the Exodus happened at all. There is no way to medically verify the death of anyone who is reported to have died either according to the Bible or Quran or hadiths. If we want to go about speculating that people who are reported to have died really didn't, we can, I guess.

Hmmm, i have encountered many Evangelical Christians and i thought you were more sincere than them. Are you here on a mission to prove that Islam is wrong or you want to know the truth?

There are many threads which discuss Islam in this forum. I don't reply to all of them despite what is being said in these threads because they can't harm Islam one bit. Islam is very solid and clear as you know. We don't differ on who is God, who is the Messenger, etc like Christians do. Look at the thread your Christian brothers and sisters make in this forum. Please go and have a look. It all ask about the identity of God, doubting of the Trinity, and doubting many other things.

Therefore, if you are really here because you think you are smart enough to cause some doubts, then you are mistaken because you are farrrr farrr away from achieving that, and i would be really really disappointed if that's why you came here.

I was mainly interested because i thought you were sincere and that you were just asking to know more about Islam since you appeared to be intelligent and reasonable enough.

Now, if you are going to use that intelligence which God gave you to try to bring imaginary argument which you think will make Islam fall apart, so you will fail miserably.

You couldn't pass through me and i'm just a layman, imagine if you were dealing with a Muslim scholar, lol. I felt from the beginning what you were trying to do but i thought to give you the benefit of the doubt till you just admitted through your statement above.

So your next answer to me will determine whether i'll continue with you or not. If you are in a mission to make Islam fall apart as you have imagined you could do so, then sorry, i'm not interested, go and make all the threads you wish to make and i won't even blink or waste time on them. Many before you have tried and failed miserably. Nevertheless, if you want to have an adult genuine sincere discussion then i'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt again and continue with you.
I am kind of surprised that you would make such judgements about me. You never even asked me to begin with why I post about Islam, now you are stating that you think I am not here to learn the truth, but to prove your religion wrong.

It is also hypocritical of you brother to get angry at me for trying to prove Islam wrong if you think that is what my purpose is and to cause doubts, when in most conversations you have had with me about Christianity you try to create doubts about my faith. You are trying to make me question and doubt the account that Jesus died on the cross, as well as the Triune nature of God, and Christ's divinity. You have even started telling me how I should and should not pray!

Do you even realize the context of me writing what I wrote?

I wrote:
"Does your not religion rely on the Quran being correct and without error? If it states that the Jews killed their prophets but they didn't or that Ramses II drowned but he didn't. your belief system also falls apart.?"

as a response to you writing that if Jesus did not die, my religion falls apart. I said the same thing applies to yours, regarding the deaths of people as recorded in the Quran, because as my religion falls apart if Jesus did not die and resurrect, yours falls apart if anything in the Quran turns out to be wrong.

So you can question and doubt that Jesus died and that is OK but if I question or doubt that the Quran is perfect in all of its details, including the deaths of the people recorded in it, all of a sudden my sincerity is questionable?

Was I insulted by your questions and critiques and trying to raise doubts about what I and other Christians believe, or did I tell you I am considering not wasting anymore time discussing with you? No!

A sincere discussion means to me that people will sincerely discuss each others' beliefs, and be free to affirm, question, or criticize even, as long as it is backed up with evidence. I have no problems at all with you questioning what I believe and trying to poke holes in my theology. I appreciate a good debate, because we learn best from people who disagree with us, not those who agree with everything we say.

If you have problems with that, then maybe we shouldn't debate. If you are OK with it, let's continue.


Why am I posting about Islam? The reason is pretty simple, though you never asked me why so you wouldn't know, even though you felt free to make speculations about my sincerity.

For the past 13 or so years I have believed that the Bible is completely free of errors and perfect. It was a rude and shocking surprise to learn this is not so, and I have had to re-evaluate what I believe and don't believe of my faith.

The only religion I am aware of that like Christianity teaches there is one God and is universal and has eternal ramifications, is Islam. I am open to the possibility that it could be true, but I am not going to abandon my faith until I am convinced that Islam is indeed free from errors. The only way I know to do that is to ask questions about what I believe are errors or potential errors in the Quran and hadiths, and see what Muslims have to say in defence of your religion. I have been convinced that some of the things I thought initially were errors or contradictions turned out not to be so, and not with others.

I enjoy discussing with you and hope that you do not choose to break off discussion with me, but to be completely honest, if you choose to do so, I won't lose sleep over it either. You are a good and sincere person and I consider you a friend and it would suck if things between us changed, but lol I have gone through a lot harder things in life and I will be fine.

Regardless of your decision, I wish you all the best and hope God leads us to Him.
 

TG123456

Active Member
Perfect.

Humans are basically one, that what they should be,unity and brotherhood.

Adam was a human, you can say he was a believer,IOW not an Arab , not Chinese ..etc ,just a human.

Humans created factions and that do separated them, now what makes the French a french and the German a German,
going back some hundreds of years would you find a french man and an English man ..etc.

Prophet Muhammed came to his people, the Arabs, and they were ignorant and in continues wars, some of them follow the message and became Muslims, but they were originally Arabs and hence the prophet declared that Humans are one, no one is better than the other, so religion should unites us again as humans.

When prophet Moses delivered his message to the Egyptians, some follow him and some others rejected his message, the ones who followed him were called later on the Jews but originally they were the Egyptians.

The same problem of today, the French Muslim even though he is a french he'll be regarded as a Muslim and will be treated badly because of his conversion.

Pharaoh did the same as what the ruler of today do, he treated those who follow Moses badly and make the factions in the one society and hence God ordered Moses to move with his believers to Palestine and started from there, the same story with Muhammed , God ordered him to Move with his believers to Al Madina, they were called later on the Muslims.

We created factions, the Jew is a human, the Muslim is a human, the Christian is a human..etc
So are you saying that the Jews mentioned in the Quran were not a separate ethnic group, but originally Egyptians who chose monotheism?

When did they convert?

Is there any connection, according to the Quran, between the Jews and Joseph?

Why were the Jews called sometimes call Banu Israil in the Quran? Weren't they just Egyptians?

Why was Pharaoh's wife not called a Jew, nor the sorcerers who were murdered for following Moses?

Are you aware that the word "Jew" has both a religious and ethnic meaning?
 
Last edited:

TG123456

Active Member
Sorcerers appear quite a lot in the Islamic tradition.

What makes someone a sorcerer and what powers do they have? Who powers their magic, Shaytan and Jinn? What evidence is required to convict someone of sorcery in Islamic Law?
Interesting questions, but how do they pertain to the topic of the thread?
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
So are you saying that the Jews mentioned in the Quran were not a separate ethnic group, but originally Egyptians who chose monotheism?

Yes exactly they were Egyptians

When did they convert?

It was when some accepted the message of Moses and immigrated to the promised land (Israel).

Is there any connection, according to the Quran, between the Jews and Joseph?

In the quran no connection, there is a complete Sura for Joseph, no mention for Jews or Banu Israel. Surat Yusuf - The Noble Qur'an - القرآن الكريم

Why were the Jews called sometimes call Banu Israil in the Quran? Weren't they just Egyptians?

Banu Israel are those who came to Israel "their promised land", there were also Banu Khaybar the Jews living in a place called Khaybar.

The word Jews are for Jews in General, but if Banu Israel then it's about the Jews living in Israel.

Why was Pharaoh's wife not called a Jew, nor the sorcerers who were murdered for following Moses?

That confirms my point, they were all Egyptians before leaving to Israel.

Are you aware that the word "Jew" has both a religious and ethnic meaning?

Yes i'm aware of that, they're humans.
 
Last edited:

TG123456

Active Member
Salaam Alaikum, FearGod. This is a very interesting discussion, I will reply more later today or tomorrow.

Take care,
TG123456
 

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Thanks for your reply. Insha'Allah i'll try to come back to respond either today or tomorrow.
 

TG123456

Active Member
Yes exactly they were Egyptians
Egyptians who were monotheists, correct?


It was when some accepted the message of Moses and immigrated to the promised land (Israel).
Hold on a second. If the reason the Pharaoh persecuted the Jews was religious, and they became monotheists because of Moses, then how come he persecuted them before Moses was born? What was the point of enslaving the Israelites and killing their firstborns, if they were being persecuted for a religion that Moses brought to them?

Also, why is there a complete silence in Egyptian records about this group of monotheists? Ramses II made records of himself conquering and enslaving Nubians and Asiatics. Why is there absolutely nothing written about these religious rebels?

We know that when an Egyptian Pharaoh called Akhenaten changed the religion to focus only on the sun god and to abandon the others, many Ancient Egyptians condemned him and wrote about him. Yet we have not one record of the Jews, allegedly Egyptian converts who Pharaoh hated so much that he tried to enslave them and kill their young... before their founder was even born.

In the quran no connection, there is a complete Sura for Joseph, no mention for Jews or Banu Israel. Surat Yusuf - The Noble Qur'an - القرآن الكريم
Thanks for showing this.

Banu Israel are those who came to Israel "their promised land", there were also Banu Khaybar the Jews living in a place called Khaybar.
Thanks for explaining.

The word Jews are for Jews in General, but if Banu Israel then it's about the Jews living in Israel.
Is the word "Jew" meant in an ethnic or religious way?

That confirms my point, they were all Egyptians before leaving to Israel.
But if Jew meant an Egyptian monotheist following Moses, why not refer to them as Jews? Didn't they become Jews as soon as they started following Moses? Why no mention of this?

Yes i'm aware of that, they're humans.
However, Muslims are not an ethnic group, they are only religious. Jews are both.
 

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I am kind of surprised that you would make such judgements about me. You never even asked me to begin with why I post about Islam, now you are stating that you think I am not here to learn the truth, but to prove your religion wrong.

It is also hypocritical of you brother to get angry at me for trying to prove Islam wrong if you think that is what my purpose is and to cause doubts, when in most conversations you have had with me about Christianity you try to create doubts about my faith. You are trying to make me question and doubt the account that Jesus died on the cross, as well as the Triune nature of God, and Christ's divinity. You have even started telling me how I should and should not pray!

Do you even realize the context of me writing what I wrote?

I wrote:
"Does your not religion rely on the Quran being correct and without error? If it states that the Jews killed their prophets but they didn't or that Ramses II drowned but he didn't. your belief system also falls apart.?"

as a response to you writing that if Jesus did not die, my religion falls apart. I said the same thing applies to yours, regarding the deaths of people as recorded in the Quran, because as my religion falls apart if Jesus did not die and resurrect, yours falls apart if anything in the Quran turns out to be wrong.

So you can question and doubt that Jesus died and that is OK but if I question or doubt that the Quran is perfect in all of its details, including the deaths of the people recorded in it, all of a sudden my sincerity is questionable?

Was I insulted by your questions and critiques and trying to raise doubts about what I and other Christians believe, or did I tell you I am considering not wasting anymore time discussing with you? No!

A sincere discussion means to me that people will sincerely discuss each others' beliefs, and be free to affirm, question, or criticize even, as long as it is backed up with evidence. I have no problems at all with you questioning what I believe and trying to poke holes in my theology. I appreciate a good debate, because we learn best from people who disagree with us, not those who agree with everything we say.

If you have problems with that, then maybe we shouldn't debate. If you are OK with it, let's continue.


Why am I posting about Islam? The reason is pretty simple, though you never asked me why so you wouldn't know, even though you felt free to make speculations about my sincerity.

For the past 13 or so years I have believed that the Bible is completely free of errors and perfect. It was a rude and shocking surprise to learn this is not so, and I have had to re-evaluate what I believe and don't believe of my faith.

The only religion I am aware of that like Christianity teaches there is one God and is universal and has eternal ramifications, is Islam. I am open to the possibility that it could be true, but I am not going to abandon my faith until I am convinced that Islam is indeed free from errors. The only way I know to do that is to ask questions about what I believe are errors or potential errors in the Quran and hadiths, and see what Muslims have to say in defence of your religion. I have been convinced that some of the things I thought initially were errors or contradictions turned out not to be so, and not with others.

I enjoy discussing with you and hope that you do not choose to break off discussion with me, but to be completely honest, if you choose to do so, I won't lose sleep over it either. You are a good and sincere person and I consider you a friend and it would suck if things between us changed, but lol I have gone through a lot harder things in life and I will be fine.

Regardless of your decision, I wish you all the best and hope God leads us to Him.

Now after going back to what you said in context and what you were replying to, i do agree with you that it was hypocritical of me to claim something and not allow you to have the right to have a counter claim of a similar nature.

Well, actually i wasn't being a hypocrite in purpose or anything but rather i just lost track of what we were saying and i allowed my ill judgment to cloud my focus and fairness.

Regarding asking you for your purpose in making these threads, i thought it was rude and none of my business for why you need to know, that you were free to ask and we were also free to answer or not to. Nevertheless, i fell for something which was far worse than rudeness, lol.

I would like to apologize from you, and for what it's worth, i have not had a very good and challenging debate with someone like you in ages. ;)

So, we shall resume our debate, if you don't mind of course. :)
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Egyptians who were monotheists, correct?

Yes, the Egyptians who accepted the message of Moses became monotheists and then became Jews once their message was distorted.

Hold on a second. If the reason the Pharaoh persecuted the Jews was religious, and they became monotheists because of Moses, then how come he persecuted them before Moses was born? What was the point of enslaving the Israelites and killing their firstborns, if they were being persecuted for a religion that Moses brought to them?

Pharaoh was dealing with the sorcerers, they told Pharaoh at one day that a child was born and will end his ruling in Egypt.

Pharaoh ordered to kill every born child in order to prevent the event from happening.

God whispered to the mother of Moses to put her child in a basket on the river as to save her child from the execution and then God provided the causes for the child to reach Pharaoh's wife and she loved him from the first instance and she decided to take care of him and God provided the causes for his true mother to breastfeed him.

One of the sorcerers told Pharaoh that he's afraid that the child in his house will be the one to end his ruling, the wife of Pharaoh protected Moses from being executed.

Also, why is there a complete silence in Egyptian records about this group of monotheists? Ramses II made records of himself conquering and enslaving Nubians and Asiatics. Why is there absolutely nothing written about these religious rebels?

Who told you that he was Ramses II ?

We know that when an Egyptian Pharaoh called Akhenaten changed the religion to focus only on the sun god and to abandon the others, many Ancient Egyptians condemned him and wrote about him. Yet we have not one record of the Jews, allegedly Egyptian converts who Pharaoh hated so much that he tried to enslave them and kill their young... before their founder was even born.

I don't know much about Egyptology if any, but according to my knowledge about the story of Moses i can know who was the real Pharaoh by connecting the date of Israel in Palestine which will point to the date of the Pharaoh of Moses.

If we can prove that the jews of Israel existed in Palestine long before Moses (or at least the expected date for Moses) then that will bring doubt about the quran, to me at least.

If you have an evidence for the exact date for the Jews of Israel then pls bring it here.


Is the word "Jew" meant in an ethnic or religious way?

Of course it is religious, we're all humans.
You can see black and white Jews.

But if Jew meant an Egyptian monotheist following Moses, why not refer to them as Jews? Didn't they become Jews as soon as they started following Moses? Why no mention of this?

No, they weren't called Jews, they went to Israel and became Banu Israel and then Jews.

However, Muslims are not an ethnic group, they are only religious. Jews are both.

So the eastern European's Jews is ethnically the same as the negro's Jews, doesn't make any sense.
 
Last edited:

TG123456

Active Member
Now after going back to what you said in context and what you were replying to, i do agree with you that it was hypocritical of me to claim something and not allow you to have the right to have a counter claim of a similar nature.

Well, actually i wasn't being a hypocrite in purpose or anything but rather i just lost track of what we were saying and i allowed my ill judgment to cloud my focus and fairness.

Regarding asking you for your purpose in making these threads, i thought it was rude and none of my business for why you need to know, that you were free to ask and we were also free to answer or not to. Nevertheless, i fell for something which was far worse than rudeness, lol.

I would like to apologize from you, and for what it's worth, i have not had a very good and challenging debate with someone like you in ages. ;)

So, we shall resume our debate, if you don't mind of course. :)
Salaam Alaikum, TashaN.

Thanks for your response and for your apology, I accept it. Sorry for calling you a hypocrite, I think there was just a misunderstanding in communication, which happens to everyone from time to time. :)

Let's continue the debate. :)
 

TG123456

Active Member
Yes, the Egyptians who accepted the message of Moses became monotheists and then became Jews once their message was distorted.
Hold on a second, earlier you wrote:

When prophet Moses delivered his message to the Egyptians, some follow him and some others rejected his message, the ones who followed him were called later on the Jews but originally they were the Egyptians.


The ones who followed the message of Moses, according to what you said were the Jews. Now you are saying that they became Jews after his message was distorted. Was Moses preaching a distorted message from the outset?

Pharaoh was dealing with the sorcerers, they told Pharaoh at one day that a child was born and will end his ruling in Egypt.

Pharaoh ordered to kill every born child in order to prevent the event from happening.

God whispered to the mother of Moses to put her child in a basket on the river as to save her child from the execution and then God provided the causes for the child to reach Pharaoh's wife and she loved him from the first instance and she decided to take care of him and God provided the causes for his true mother to breastfeed him.

One of the sorcerers told Pharaoh that he's afraid that the child in his house will be the one to end his ruling, the wife of Moses protected Moses from being executed.
Where does it say in the Quran that the sorcerers told Pharaoh that one day a child will be born to depose him?

Are you seriously suggesting that there was an Egyptian Pharaoh who one year tried to kill every newborn child in Ancient Egypt? Which one???

What kind of a madman would try to kill off a child in every family among his population? Why is there no Egyptian or any other record that states such a thing?

Who told you that he was Ramses II ?
Like the Pharaoh of the Quran, he ruled for a several decades. The Quran teaches us that when Moses was full age, he had to flee Egypt after killing a man who was abusing an Israelite. At what age does a person become full age? He had to have at least been 15 or 17. Let's say 15. We know that Moses was in Midian for 10 years, also according to the Quran. He came back to Egypt, and the plagues according to the Quran also lasted for a few years. Let's make a minimal estimate and say it was two.

The Pharaoh of the Quran would have at least had been ruling on the throne for 27 years. Which other Pharaoh could it have been?

I don't know much about Egyptology if any, but according to my knowledge about the story of Moses i can know who was the real Pharaoh by connecting the date of Israel in Palestine which will point to the date of the Pharaoh of Moses.
Who do you believe it was?

If we can prove that the jews of Israel existed in Palestine long before Moses (or at least the expected date for Moses) then that will bring doubt about the quran, to me at least.

If you have an evidence for the exact date for the Jews of Israel then pls bring it here.
We know that a group of people called "Habiru" lived in Canaan and fought with Egyptian armies there. We also know that many of them were in Ancient Egypt as early as the 15th century BC, doing manual labour.

Ancient Egyptian literature bears mention of a specific group of people designated as PR.W. This is pronounced, "Apiru'. Scholars were quick to notice the similarity in the word Apiru, with Habiru, and in turn, Hebrew.

Indeed, the word Apiru oftentimes refers to a similar type of people as Habiru. Apiru in the Egyptian texts are often depicted in manual labor, a parallel of the Hebrews in ancient Egyptian history.

Scholars agree that the PR.W finds its Akkadian equivalent in the Hapiru. The reference in ancient Egyptian literature has been proven to simply be a different designation for the same group of people.


A scene from the tomb of an Egyptian woman dating from 1470 B.C.E. depicts a group of men working at a winepress. The caption of the scene reads;

"Straining out wine by the Apiru."

The date of this scene puts it during the reign of Hatshepsut, and Thutmose III. It is noteworthy this scene depicts foreigners doing manual labor in Egypt.


Ancient Egyptian Literature and the Habiru

Of course it is religious, we're all humans.
You can see black and white Jews.
OK. However, unlike Muslims and Christians, Jews see themselves both as a religion and an ethnic group.

No, they weren't called Jews, they went to Israel and became Banu Israel and then Jews.
So is "Jew" a term used for someone who is following a distortion of the religion of Moses?

So the eastern European's Jews is ethnically the same as the negro's Jews, doesn't make any sense.
Actually, studies show that they are genetically very similar.

Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level. Admixture estimates suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and Roman Jewish communities. A multidimensional scaling plot placed six of the seven Jewish populations in a relatively tight cluster that was interspersed with Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations, including Palestinians and Syrians. Pairwise differentiation tests further indicated that these Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.

...

Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that Diaspora Jews from Europe, Northwest Africa, and the Near East resemble each other more closely than they resemble their non-Jewish neighbors. First, six of the seven Jewish populations analyzed here formed a relatively tight cluster in the MDS analysis (Fig. (Fig.2).2). The only exception was the Ethiopian Jews, who were affiliated more closely with non-Jewish Ethiopians and other North Africans. Our results are consistent with other studies of Ethiopian Jews based on a variety of markers (16, 23, 46). However, as in other studies where Ethiopian Jews exhibited markers that are characteristic of both African and Middle Eastern populations, they had Y-chromosome haplotypes (e.g., haplotypes Med and YAP+4S) that were common in other Jewish populations.


Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes
 
Last edited:

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Hold on a second, earlier you wrote:

When prophet Moses delivered his message to the Egyptians, some follow him and some others rejected his message, the ones who followed him were called later on the Jews but originally they were the Egyptians.


The ones who followed the message of Moses, according to what you said were the Jews. Now you are saying that they became Jews after his message was distorted. Was Moses preaching a distorted message from the outset?

I said "later on" and not from the outset.

All prophets taught Islam which means submission to God, one example to understand it is the Bahai.
They were Muslims before becoming Bahai.

Job 22:21
“Submit to God and be at peace with him; in this way prosperity will come to you.

Proverbs 3:6
in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight.

Where does it say in the Quran that the sorcerers told Pharaoh that one day a child will be born to depose him?

It is how the story was interpreted, i don't know the exact source for it

Are you seriously suggesting that there was an Egyptian Pharaoh who one year tried to kill every newborn child in Ancient Egypt? Which one???

According to the quran the mentioned Pharaoh was an oppressor and a dictator, he raped their women and killed their children, not sure about the reason why he was so and which Pharaoh.


What kind of a madman would try to kill off a child in every family among his population? Why is there no Egyptian or any other record that states such a thing?

Do you think rulers had allowed recording their bad deeds ?
Do you think that there were Media and free speeches at that era ?

Like the Pharaoh of the Quran, he ruled for a several decades. The Quran teaches us that when Moses was full age, he had to flee Egypt after killing a man who was abusing an Israelite. At what age does a person become full age? He had to have at least been 15 or 17. Let's say 15. We know that Moses was in Midian for 10 years, also according to the Quran. He came back to Egypt, and the plagues according to the Quran also lasted for a few years. Let's make a minimal estimate and say it was two.

The quran didn't mention that he killed an Israelite but ones of those not following him.

The Pharaoh of the Quran would have at least had been ruling on the throne for 27 years. Which other Pharaoh could it have been?

We can never be sure about the exact dates for the years ruled by each Pharaoh, we don't even sure about the date of Jesus's birth day.

Who do you believe it was?

Mernpetah

We know that a group of people called "Habiru" lived in Canaan and fought with Egyptian armies there. We also know that many of them were in Ancient Egypt as early as the 15th century BC, doing manual labour.

So you think the Jews were living long time ago in Egypt and even involved with the Egyptian army.
How you said before that the Jews never lived in ancient Egypt ? Are you contradicting yourself just to refute the quran.

Ancient Egyptian literature bears mention of a specific group of people designated as PR.W. This is pronounced, "Apiru'. Scholars were quick to notice the similarity in the word Apiru, with Habiru, and in turn, Hebrew.

So you want to believe guessing as to be an absolute fact.

Indeed, the word Apiru oftentimes refers to a similar type of people as Habiru. Apiru in the Egyptian texts are often depicted in manual labor, a parallel of the Hebrews in ancient Egyptian history.

Scholars agree that the PR.W finds its Akkadian equivalent in the Hapiru. The reference in ancient Egyptian literature has been proven to simply be a different designation for the same group of people.

That proves that you're wasting your time and ours.

A scene from the tomb of an Egyptian woman dating from 1470 B.C.E. depicts a group of men working at a winepress. The caption of the scene reads;

"Straining out wine by the Apiru."

The date of this scene puts it during the reign of Hatshepsut, and Thutmose III. It is noteworthy this scene depicts foreigners doing manual labor in Egypt.

And those foreigners are the Jews having business in Egypt, that of course makes sense to you.


OK. However, unlike Muslims and Christians, Jews see themselves both as a religion and an ethnic group.

And if they see themselves so, then it should be an absolute fact.

So is "Jew" a term used for someone who is following a distortion of the religion of Moses?

Yes it is, submitting to God's will in peace is the message and not Juda or Christ ..etc

Actually, studies show that they are genetically very similar.

Do you think the Jews who accepted Jesus and became Christians are genetically still Jews and the Jews who accepted Islam are still genetically Jews, so we are all genetically Jews.

Are you sure that you care to find the truth, i'm 100% in doubt of that

"Jews" Are Not Descendants of Abraham


Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level. Admixture estimates suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and Roman Jewish communities. A multidimensional scaling plot placed six of the seven Jewish populations in a relatively tight cluster that was interspersed with Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations, including Palestinians and Syrians. Pairwise differentiation tests further indicated that these Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.
Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that Diaspora Jews from Europe, Northwest Africa, and the Near East resemble each other more closely than they resemble their non-Jewish neighbors. First, six of the seven Jewish populations analyzed here formed a relatively tight cluster in the MDS analysis (Fig. (Fig.2).2). The only exception was the Ethiopian Jews, who were affiliated more closely with non-Jewish Ethiopians and other North Africans. Our results are consistent with other studies of Ethiopian Jews based on a variety of markers (16, 23, 46). However, as in other studies where Ethiopian Jews exhibited markers that are characteristic of both African and Middle Eastern populations, they had Y-chromosome haplotypes (e.g., haplotypes Med and YAP+4S) that were common in other Jewish populations.


Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes

What a silly approach ?!

Judaism is a religion and the one who believed it and accepted it becomes a Jew.
Conversion to Judaism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Salaam Alaikum, TashaN.

Thanks for your response and for your apology, I accept it. Sorry for calling you a hypocrite, I think there was just a misunderstanding in communication, which happens to everyone from time to time. :)

Let's continue the debate. :)

Walikum Alsalam. You don't have to be sorry. You were right about me and i was wrong. That's the truth which i had to admit.

By the way, i want to retreat some of my opinions like the crucifixion matter. Although i wanted to go further about it but when i asked my teacher, he told me that i was wrong. I'll come back to write more posts in details insha'Allah.
 

TG123456

Active Member
Walikum Alsalam. You don't have to be sorry. You were right about me and i was wrong. That's the truth which i had to admit.

By the way, i want to retreat some of my opinions like the crucifixion matter. Although i wanted to go further about it but when i asked my teacher, he told me that i was wrong. I'll come back to write more posts in details insha'Allah.
Salaam Alaikum TashaN and glad to hear from you. No problem with needing to take back some opinions, it happens to everyone.

Can you elaborate on that though, and let me know what you are taking back about what you stated on the crucifixion, and why?

That's cool that you asked your teacher for advice, it's always an awesome idea to seek knowledge. Both Christianity and Islam are in agreement on this.

Looking forward to reading your posts later, inshAllah. Have a good day and take care. :)
 

TG123456

Active Member
I said "later on" and not from the outset.

All prophets taught Islam which means submission to God, one example to understand it is the Bahai.
They were Muslims before becoming Bahai.

Job 22:21
“Submit to God and be at peace with him; in this way prosperity will come to you.

Proverbs 3:6
in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight.
OK, thank you for that. Now I think I understand what you are saying.

The people who were oppressed in Egypt by Pharaoh was the Egyptian population, and later some of them followed Moses and came to Israel and became Banu Israil, and later they became Jews when they allegedly changed what was given to them. Would that be a correct understanding of what you are saying?

It is how the story was interpreted, i don't know the exact source for it
I do. This interpretation comes from Ibn Qathir, who wrote a book called "The Stories of the Prophets".

The pharaoh who ruled Egypt was a tyrant who oppressed the descendants of Jacob (pbuh), known as the children of Israel (Bani Israel). He used every means to demean and disgrace them. They were kept in bondage and forced to work for him for small wages or nothing. Under this system the people obeyed and worshipped the pharaoh, and the ruling class carried out his orders, thereby authorizing his tyranny and crazy whims.

The pharaoh wanted the people to obey him only, and to believe in the gods of his invention. Perhaps, during that time, there were many classes of people who did not believe in or practice polytheism; however, they kept this to themselves and outwardly did as they were expected to do, without revolting or revealing themselves to anyone.

Thus, successive dynasties came to Egypt and assumed that they were gods or their representative or spokesmen.

Years passed, and a despotic king, who was adored by the Egyptians, ruled Egypt. His king saw the children of Israel multiplying and prospering. He heard them talking about a vague vision that one of Israel' s sons would dethrone the pharaoh of Egypt. Perhaps this vision was only a daydream that persisted within the hearts of the persecuted minority, or perhaps it was a prophecy from their books.

Another tradition states that it was Pharaoh himself who had the vision. Ibn 'Abbas narrated: "Pharaoh saw in his vision a fire, which came from Jerusalem and burned the houses of the Egyptians, and all Copts, and did not do harm to the children of Israel. When he woke up, he was horrified. He then gathered his priests and magicians and asked them about this vision. They said: 'This means a boy will be born of them and the Egyptian people will perish at his hands.' That is why Pharaoh commanded that all male children of the children of Israel be killed."

Either way, this vision reached the ears of the Pharaoh. He then issued a decree to slay any male child that would be born to the children of Israel. This was carried out until the experts of economics said to Pharaoh: "The aged of the children of Israel die and the young are slaughtered. This will lead to their annihilation. As a result, Pharaoh will lose the manpower of those who work for him, those whom he enslaves, and their women whom he exploits. It is better to regulate this procedure by initiating the following policy: males should be slaughtered in one year but spared to live the next year." Pharaoh found that solution to be safer economically.


The Story of Moses and Aaron (Musa and Haroon) - Stories of the Prophets - Islamic eBooks - A2Youth.com

Ibn Qathir wrote that after Pharaoh's vision, his advisors told him to put to death firstborn male children of every second year.

He also wrote that the Banu Israil were descendants from Jacob, and also that there was obviously a difference between them and the Coptic natives.

According to the quran the mentioned Pharaoh was an oppressor and a dictator, he raped their women and killed their children, not sure about the reason why he was so and which Pharaoh.
No Pharaoh would kill off firstborn male children every second year from his entire population. Firstly, Egypt was fearful of its neighbours, and doing such an idiotic thing would be suicidal for the army. Secondly, his own people would have overthrown him.

We know from Ancient Egyptian records that there was some freedom in that country, and workers in fact went on strike at times. Do you think the entire population would consent to an infanticide of their children carried out every second year??? Come on, my friend.

Do you think rulers had allowed recording their bad deeds ?
Do you think that there were Media and free speeches at that era ?
No, but even Egyptians who lived after Ramses II only had good things to say about him. There is no record anywhere of what you described, not even in the Quran or tafsirs or Bible.

The quran didn't mention that he killed an Israelite but ones of those not following him.
Sorry, thank you for the correction.

We can never be sure about the exact dates for the years ruled by each Pharaoh, we don't even sure about the date of Jesus's birth day.
No, but we know how many years they ruled.
List of pharaohs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Keep in mind also that the title of Pharaoh only began to be used for Egyptian kings during the reign of Tuthmose III (1479-1425 BC)

Mernpetah
Why Mernpetah?

So you think the Jews were living long time ago in Egypt and even involved with the Egyptian army.
How you said before that the Jews never lived in ancient Egypt ? Are you contradicting yourself just to refute the quran.
Where did I say the Jews never lived in Ancient Egypt?

So you want to believe guessing as to be an absolute fact.
Aren't you guessing the Pharaoh was Merneptah?

If the Habiru were not the Hebrews, who do you think they were?

That proves that you're wasting your time and ours.
Why?

And those foreigners are the Jews having business in Egypt, that of course makes sense to you.
Why not?

And if they see themselves so, then it should be an absolute fact.
Explain then the genetic similarily most of them seem to share.

Yes it is, submitting to God's will in peace is the message and not Juda or Christ ..etc

2:262
Indeed, those who believed and those who were Jews or Christians or Sabeans [before Prophet Muhammad] - those [among them] who believed in Allah and the Last Day and did righteousness - will have their reward with their Lord, and no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve.

How can it be then that before Muhammad came there were Jews and Christians who believed in God and the Last Day and did righteousness?

Weren't they following a distorted religion?

Do you think the Jews who accepted Jesus and became Christians are genetically still Jews and the Jews who accepted Islam are still genetically Jews, so we are all genetically Jews.
Those Jews who accepted Christianity and Islam were genetically Jews, since to be a Jew means to be a member of the religion of Judaism and/or a member of a certain ethnic group.

We are not all genetically Jews. A Japanese Christian or Muslim does not have the same genetic make-up as a Jew.
Are you sure that you care to find the truth, i'm 100% in doubt of that

"Jews" Are Not Descendants of Abraham
I've read the article. Have you read rebuttals to the theory, like this one?

Refuting the Khazar Theory of Aurthur Hoestler (The Thirteenth Tribe) and Others.


What a silly approach ?!

Judaism is a religion and the one who believed it and accepted it becomes a Jew.
Conversion to Judaism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
True, it is a religion. It is also an ethnicity, as genetic studies demonstrate.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
OK, thank you for that. Now I think I understand what you are saying.

The people who were oppressed in Egypt by Pharaoh was the Egyptian population, and later some of them followed Moses and came to Israel and became Banu Israil, and later they became Jews when they allegedly changed what was given to them. Would that be a correct understanding of what you are saying?

Yes exactly

I do. This interpretation comes from Ibn Qathir, who wrote a book called "The Stories of the Prophets".

The pharaoh who ruled Egypt was a tyrant who oppressed the descendants of Jacob (pbuh), known as the children of Israel (Bani Israel). He used every means to demean and disgrace them. They were kept in bondage and forced to work for him for small wages or nothing. Under this system the people obeyed and worshipped the pharaoh, and the ruling class carried out his orders, thereby authorizing his tyranny and crazy whims.

The pharaoh wanted the people to obey him only, and to believe in the gods of his invention. Perhaps, during that time, there were many classes of people who did not believe in or practice polytheism; however, they kept this to themselves and outwardly did as they were expected to do, without revolting or revealing themselves to anyone.

Thus, successive dynasties came to Egypt and assumed that they were gods or their representative or spokesmen.

Years passed, and a despotic king, who was adored by the Egyptians, ruled Egypt. His king saw the children of Israel multiplying and prospering. He heard them talking about a vague vision that one of Israel' s sons would dethrone the pharaoh of Egypt. Perhaps this vision was only a daydream that persisted within the hearts of the persecuted minority, or perhaps it was a prophecy from their books.

Another tradition states that it was Pharaoh himself who had the vision. Ibn 'Abbas narrated: "Pharaoh saw in his vision a fire, which came from Jerusalem and burned the houses of the Egyptians, and all Copts, and did not do harm to the children of Israel. When he woke up, he was horrified. He then gathered his priests and magicians and asked them about this vision. They said: 'This means a boy will be born of them and the Egyptian people will perish at his hands.' That is why Pharaoh commanded that all male children of the children of Israel be killed."

Either way, this vision reached the ears of the Pharaoh. He then issued a decree to slay any male child that would be born to the children of Israel. This was carried out until the experts of economics said to Pharaoh: "The aged of the children of Israel die and the young are slaughtered. This will lead to their annihilation. As a result, Pharaoh will lose the manpower of those who work for him, those whom he enslaves, and their women whom he exploits. It is better to regulate this procedure by initiating the following policy: males should be slaughtered in one year but spared to live the next year." Pharaoh found that solution to be safer economically.


The Story of Moses and Aaron (Musa and Haroon) - Stories of the Prophets - Islamic eBooks - A2Youth.com

Ibn Qathir wrote that after Pharaoh's vision, his advisors told him to put to death firstborn male children of every second year.

He also wrote that the Banu Israil were descendants from Jacob, and also that there was obviously a difference between them and the Coptic natives.

Yes but i don't know what is his sources, so i can't confirm what he wrote as the quran didn't say why Pharaoh was so aggressive.

No Pharaoh would kill off firstborn male children every second year from his entire population. Firstly, Egypt was fearful of its neighbours, and doing such an idiotic thing would be suicidal for the army. Secondly, his own people would have overthrown him.

I ain't sure about why Pharaoh was a dictator, but i don't agree with you that a dictator would care about the reaction of the public, even today the public can do nothing with the martial law, obey or die.
-
Look to Mubarak regime and how many civilians died and then the Sisi.

We know from Ancient Egyptian records that there was some freedom in that country, and workers in fact went on strike at times. Do you think the entire population would consent to an infanticide of their children carried out every second year??? Come on, my friend.

Yes you're right and i think that is the reason that some followed Moses against Pharaoh.

No, but even Egyptians who lived after Ramses II only had good things to say about him. There is no record anywhere of what you described, not even in the Quran or tafsirs or Bible.

Yes he was an Angel, all rulers of ancient Egypt were Angels and there were freedom of speech and democracy.


No, but we know how many years they ruled.
List of pharaohs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Keep in mind also that the title of Pharaoh only began to be used for Egyptian kings during the reign of Tuthmose III (1479-1425 BC)

No problem, i'll assume dates are correct

Why Mernpetah?

For 2 reasons, first Israel was only known in his period and never before and also there was a war between him and Israel, second is the study headed by Maurice which confirms that the death was due to drowning.

Where did I say the Jews never lived in Ancient Egypt?

You said they were slaves, Question about 28:4 to Muslim posters | Page 5 | ReligiousForums.com

Then you're saying the Jews lived long ago in Egypt and even involved in the Egyptian army.

Aren't you guessing the Pharaoh was Merneptah?

Yes of course i admit that i'm guessing, i don't claim that i'm 100% certain.

If the Habiru were not the Hebrews, who do you think they were?

How could we know, Egyptians were called pharaohs, in Arabic Masreyeen, Jews were called yahood and still called in Hebrew and Arabic as Yahood.


Because you are saying that Habiru were the Jews whereas before you said there was no evidence for the Jews in ancient Egypt and foreigners were prisoners and slaves,so you're contradicting yourself.


Because how a prisoner and a slave can manage business in Ancient Egypt.

Explain then the genetic similarily most of them seem to share.

Now if i become a Jew then my genetic will be similar to the Jews.
Are you really serious ?
Judaism is a religion.

Indeed, those who believed and those who were Jews or Christians or Sabeans [before Prophet Muhammad] - those [among them] who believed in Allah and the Last Day and did righteousness - will have their reward with their Lord, and no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve.

How can it be then that before Muhammad came there were Jews and Christians who believed in God and the Last Day and did righteousness?

Weren't they following a distorted religion?

The verse is in the past tense,it makes sense, people before Islam born as Jews and Christians ..etc, so do you think it's fair that all of them to be punished for being so.


Those Jews who accepted Christianity and Islam were genetically Jews, since to be a Jew means to be a member of the religion of Judaism and/or a member of a certain ethnic group.

We are not all genetically Jews. A Japanese Christian or Muslim does not have the same genetic make-up as a Jew.

I've read the article. Have you read rebuttals to the theory, like this one?

Refuting the Khazar Theory of Aurthur Hoestler (The Thirteenth Tribe) and Others.



True, it is a religion. It is also an ethnicity, as genetic studies demonstrate.

Now if a Jew accepted Islam, will he still be called a Jew or will be called a Muslim.
 

TG123456

Active Member
Yes exactly
Thank you for confirming. I just wanted to have an understanding of what you believe so I don't misunderstand or misrepresent your words.

If the Jews became the Banu Israil after they arrived in Israel, then how come 20:47 states:

20:47

So go to him and say, 'Indeed, we are messengers of your Lord, so send with us the Children of Israel and do not torment them. We have come to you with a sign from your Lord. And peace will be upon he who follows the guidance.

Why would Moses call Egyptians the Children of Israel when they hadn't even arrived there yet, and how would Pharaoh have known who he was talking about?

Yes but i don't know what is his sources, so i can't confirm what he wrote as the quran didn't say why Pharaoh was so aggressive.
Then how can you know that the Israelites were in fact Egyptians, or that Pharaoh's plan to kill all the newborns in Egypt came as a result of lobbying from sorcerers?


I ain't sure about why Pharaoh was a dictator, but i don't agree with you that a dictator would care about the reaction of the public, even today the public can do nothing with the martial law, obey or die.
-
Look to Mubarak regime and how many civilians died and then the Sisi.
I think I may have been unclear. It is not surprising that during the reign of Ramses II, no one discussed his crimes. What is surprising, and ubelievable, is that no one after him would have said he attempted a genocide of his own population.

The fact is that Ramses II was venerated by his people, and held in very high esteem. The same can't be said either of Mubarak or Sisi, or even tyrants like Ivan the Terrible or Nero or Shaka Zulu. There has not been one historian or even scholar to my knowledge who stated what you just said, that Ramses II (assuming he was the Pharaoh of the Quran) attempted an infanticide on a national level of his own people.


Yes you're right and i think that is the reason that some followed Moses against Pharaoh.
Do you think that only "some" would follow him if there was indeed a nation in which almost everyone was oppressed by massive infanticide?

Yes he was an Angel, all rulers of ancient Egypt were Angels and there were freedom of speech and democracy.
Yes, they were the ones appearing in the 1990s commercials about selling cream cheese.

I love your sarcasm and obviously there was no democracy in Ancient Egypt. There were however some rights that workers did have, even if they lived under very unfair conditions and in a very unequal society.

No problem, i'll assume dates are correct
Great.

For 2 reasons, first Israel was only known in his period and never before and also there was a war between him and Israel, second is the study headed by Maurice which confirms that the death was due to drowning.
Are you sure Maurice Bucaille said that he died from drowning, or did he say this about Ramses II? Can you please provide a source to back up your claim?

You said they were slaves, Question about 28:4 to Muslim posters | Page 5 | ReligiousForums.com

Then you're saying the Jews lived long ago in Egypt and even involved in the Egyptian army.
I read my post. Where did I say they were not living in Ancient Egypt? When I said the Habiru fought with the Egyptian armies, I meant to say they fought against them. Notice I said they lived in Canaan (what is now Israel/Palestine) and that they were brought into Egypt as slaves.

Yes of course i admit that i'm guessing, i don't claim that i'm 100% certain.
I look forward to reading the Bucaille quote you cited about him being the Pharaoh of the Quran.

How could we know, Egyptians were called pharaohs, in Arabic Masreyeen, Jews were called yahood and still called in Hebrew and Arabic as Yahood.
If you believe the hypothesis I presented is wrong, then show where my sources are mistaken and/or present a better one, also using historical sources.

Because you are saying that Habiru were the Jews whereas before you said there was no evidence for the Jews in ancient Egypt and foreigners were prisoners and slaves,so you're contradicting yourself.
Where did I say there was no evidence for Jews in Ancient Egypt? Please show me were I wrote that. Thanks so much.

Because how a prisoner and a slave can manage business in Ancient Egypt.
Where did I say they were managing business while they were prisoners and/or slaves?

Now if i become a Jew then my genetic will be similar to the Jews.
Are you really serious ?
Judaism is a religion.
If you convert to Judaism of course your genetics will not change, but it does not change the fact that the overwhelming majority of Jews in the world share the same genetics, different than the genetics of non-Jews. So yes, Judaism is a religion that one can convert to, but at the same time Jews also are an ethnic group.

The verse is in the past tense,it makes sense, people before Islam born as Jews and Christians ..etc, so do you think it's fair that all of them to be punished for being so.
So it was OK to follow distorted religions prior to Islam? When were Judaism and Christianity distorted, and by who?

Now if a Jew accepted Islam, will he still be called a Jew or will be called a Muslim.
Probably a Muslim, or a Jewish Muslim. :)
 
Top