• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

F1fan

Veteran Member
Well Answers in Genesis is peer reviewed, uses the scientific method and publishes papers, etc.
No they don't. Their peers are other creationists, not experts in the sciences.

If you research AiG and the Discovery Institute you will find that neither of these organizations have science labs. Neither is part of a university. Both rent office space in office buildings, and they don't conduct any work. They produce disinformation for guilible Christians. They sell merchandice and books. They create fraud, but are protected because they are religious organizations, not held to standards in science where they can be legally challenged. Of course reputable scientists do explain how creationism is fraud. It is deliberate fraud in the 21st century. And as we see they are still successful in getting some people to buy into their fraud.
Floods can produce many valves in a short time and the worldwide flood was very large.
There's no evdience of a global flood. The Indus Valley in India did not experience a flood as described by your literalist interpretation of Genesis. The Indus Valley civilization is older that the Egyptian settlements, which are themselves aged about 7000 BCE. That puts a huge fly in the ointment of your interpreation of Genesis. How do you explain that these civilizations date back before your belief about the Bible stories in Genesis? Why are you interpreting Genesis in a way that even Jews don't do?

Is there any chance you are mistaken as a fallen sinner?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
No they don't. Their peers are other creationists, not experts in the sciences.

If you research AiG and the Discovery Institute you will find that neither of these organizations have science labs. Neither is part of a university. Both rent office space in office buildings, and they don't conduct any work. They produce disinformation for guilible Christians. They sell merchandice and books. They create fraud, but are protected because they are religious organizations, not held to standards in science where they can be legally challenged. Of course reputable scientists do explain how creationism is fraud. It is deliberate fraud in the 21st century. And as we see they are still successful in getting some people to buy into their fraud.

There's no evdience of a global flood. The Indus Valley in India did not experience a flood as described by your literalist interpretation of Genesis. The Indus Valley civilization is older that the Egyptian settlements, which are themselves aged about 7000 BCE. That puts a huge fly in the ointment of your interpreation of Genesis. How do you explain that these civilizations date back before your belief about the Bible stories in Genesis? Why are you interpreting Genesis in a way that even Jews don't do?

Is there any chance you are mistaken as a fallen sinner?
And they dated that how?
They would have had a count of years.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Answers in genesis is a science site.
No. It clearly is not. This is why you need to learn the basics of science. Only a liar or someone with no understanding of the sciences at all would say what you said. And I do not think that you are a liar. Even though you claim that your God is a liar.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
If you are interested in truth you need to do your own homework. As we see you reject any expert explanations because you have decided your faulty interpretation of the Bible is true.

You’ve done that to a faulty conclusion. There was no Adam and Eve.
It is a recored fact.
It is also scientific fact of mitochondrial Eve and XY Adam.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You said you can disprove parts of the Bible with something.
Please try.
No one has.
Your inability to understand something does not mean that it has not been refuted. For example, one poster here, it was not me, refuted your claim about a young Earth by posting a picture of the White Cliffs of Dover. You did not understand that, it does not mean that it never happened.

Since you do not understand the concept of evidence many points go way over your head.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Your inability to understand something does not mean that it has not been refuted. For example, one poster here, it was not me, refuted your claim about a young Earth by posting a picture of the White Cliffs of Dover. You did not understand that, it does not mean that it never happened.

Since you do not understand the concept of evidence many points go way over your head.
And I corrected the poster's error. They are the result of the flood. That is exactly what large floods produce.
Mount Saint Helen's eruption shows that on a smaller scale.
 
Top