Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

[ratiocinator]

There is no evidence for evolution just assumptions with no real answers born of circular reasoning,

False.

Genesis and the Genome (pdf)

Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences

We demonstrate quantitatively that, as predicted by evolutionary theory, sequences of homologous proteins from different species converge as we go further and further back in time. The converse, a non-evolutionary model can be expressed as probabilities, and the test works for chloroplast...

journals.plos.org

The Evidence For Evolution: A Succinct Introduction For Denialists

Despite recent polls showing that the majority of young Americans accept evolution, there is still more work to be done. There is still a…

rcarmona43.medium.com

Statistical evidence for common ancestry: New tests of universal ancestry

While there is no doubt among evolutionary biologists that all living species, or merely all living species within a particular group (e.g., animals), share descent from a common ancestor, formal statistical methods for evaluating common ancestry from aligned DNA sequence data have received...

www.biorxiv.org

Common Descent vs. Common Design: 4 Examples Explained Better by Descent - BioLogos

We who accept Descent should admit that there are some observations that can be explained equally well by Design. But there are other observations which seem to clearly favor Descent.

biologos.org

Testing Common Ancestry: It’s All About the Mutations - BioLogos

biologos.org

 

[SavedByTheLord]

False.

Genesis and the Genome (pdf)

Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences

We demonstrate quantitatively that, as predicted by evolutionary theory, sequences of homologous proteins from different species converge as we go further and further back in time. The converse, a non-evolutionary model can be expressed as probabilities, and the test works for chloroplast...

journals.plos.org

The Evidence For Evolution: A Succinct Introduction For Denialists

Despite recent polls showing that the majority of young Americans accept evolution, there is still more work to be done. There is still a…

rcarmona43.medium.com

Statistical evidence for common ancestry: New tests of universal ancestry

While there is no doubt among evolutionary biologists that all living species, or merely all living species within a particular group (e.g., animals), share descent from a common ancestor, formal statistical methods for evaluating common ancestry from aligned DNA sequence data have received...

www.biorxiv.org

Common Descent vs. Common Design: 4 Examples Explained Better by Descent - BioLogos

We who accept Descent should admit that there are some observations that can be explained equally well by Design. But there are other observations which seem to clearly favor Descent.

biologos.org

Testing Common Ancestry: It’s All About the Mutations - BioLogos

biologos.org

Same old circular reasoning.

Evolution is falsified just by this small detail.

Figure 6-85, The cellular mechanisms that monitor protein quality after protein synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[ratiocinator]

Same old circular reasoning.

Baseless assertion.

I'm still waiting for you to cite even one single, solitary example of circular reasoning in science. Why can't you?

Take any one of those links and tell me exactly why it is circular reasoning.

 

[ratiocinator]

Evolution is falsified just by this small detail.

Another baseless assertion.

Why?

Reasoning-free, baseless assertion and an apparently random link is not going to convince anybody who has the slightest grasp of basic logic and evidence.

 

[Little Dragon]

Life can be remarkably variable -- and flexible.
Multicellularity in primitive life can get pretty tricky. Unicellular organisms, like Dictyosteliid slime molds or certain poymorphic Bryozoid zooids can come together, specialize, and morph into multicellular organisms, with specialized cells and structures.

Yes slime moulds are very interesting. In fact they display problem solving capabilities.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Another baseless assertion.

Why?

Reasoning-free, baseless assertion and an apparently random link is not going to convince anybody who has the slightest grasp of basic logic and evidence.

Evolution could not have produced this even in trillions of trillions of years.

Figure 6-83, The hsp70 family of molecular chaperones - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[ratiocinator]

Evolution could not have produced this even in trillions of trillions of years.

Yet another baseless assertion. Where is your reasoning?

 

[Subduction Zone]

There is no evidence for evolution just assumptions with no real answers born of circular reasoning,

This refutes evolution.

Figure 6-80, The structure of a molten globule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Once again you confirm that you are scientifically illiterate.


You forgot the definition of scientific evidence, didn't you?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Same old circular reasoning.

Evolution is falsified just by this small detail.

Figure 6-85, The cellular mechanisms that monitor protein quality after protein synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Okay, senility may be settling in. Now you have forgotten what circular reasoning is.

 

[Subduction Zone]

@SavedByTheLord , don't worry buddy. I am here to help you. I will be more than happy to go over the concepts of scientific evidence, the scientific method, and logical fallacies with you.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

There is no evidence for evolution just assumptions with no real answers born of circular reasoning,

This refutes evolution.

Figure 6-80, The structure of a molten globule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

So you didn't bother to answer my questions and just jumped right back into the campaign again.

Did Jesus teach or did He campaign. Did He listen or do what you are doing? Did He answer questions or ignore people like they are objects?

 

[Valjean]

There is no evidence for evolution just assumptions with no real answers born of circular reasoning,

This refutes evolution.

Figure 6-80, The structure of a molten globule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Why do you keep saying this? You've made this assertion a hundred times, but never defended it.

If this article refutes evolution, why does the author, not to mention the entire staff of the magazine, still believe in it?
You have no idea how science works, what evidence is, or how to evaluate it.

 

[Valjean]

Same old circular reasoning.

Evolution is falsified just by this small detail.

Figure 6-85, The cellular mechanisms that monitor protein quality after protein synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

You don't know what circular reasoning is. If you read the article, you did not comprehend it.
If evolution were so easily falsified, why has it not been dropped, like spontaneous generation or flat Earth belief?
Why do everyone but the religious still believe in it? Why is belief strongest among the educated?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I realize you don't think abiogenesis is part of the process of what is deemed to be evolution.

It factually isn't. And every time you claim otherwise, you are engaging in willful ignorance and strawmanning.
You KNOW it isn't because plenty of people have already explained to you how and why it isn't. I know, because I'm one of them.

Your willful ignorance is not an argument. If anything, it's mere intellectual dishonesty which is of no consequence whatsoever. The only thing you achieve with it, is that people stop taking you seriously. It only makes your side look bad.

But it is. You simply cannot have evolution without a start, and that start would be supposedly from the theory of abiogenesis.

No. For the trillionth time: that start is "life exists". Period.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

As I look at it now, combining two chemicals in whatever form scientists think they may have been and have them multiply by some force is beyond physical reason. The initial elements themselves are not simple as if they just got there. But that's how I think now and frankly there is no evidence to prove otherwise. Or explain otherwise. It didn't just happen by fortuitous meeting of elements producing life eventually supposedly evolving by chemical/mechanical/physical/biologic means to plants and animals and humans. That is how I see it now. Take care.

Nobody who cares about intellectual discourse is interested in how the intellectually dishonest and the willfully ignorant "see it".

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Lol ok I will. It disproves itself because it cannot be proved. Meaning it is impossible to prove. It doesn't matter if someone says it has been or can be proved. It has not been and logic should show that when the evidence (such as sponges as said to be maybe one of the first living things) is spoken of it is so out-of-this-world by imagination that it disputes/refutes itself when looked at with an honest eye. I'm speaking now primarily of the start. The beginning through subsequent supposedly early stages of the said process.

By that retarded "logic", every scientific theory "disproves itself" because no theory can ever be "proven".


Count on creationists to dismiss the whole of science with an absurd handwave, while using practical applications of science to communicate their willfully ignorant fallacious nonsense at light speed over the interwebs.

Good grief............

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I can understand the theory.

Yes, you can. You have a brain so you certainly can.

The problem is that you clearly don't want to

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So you didn't bother to answer my questions and just jumped right back into the campaign again.

Did Jesus teach or did He campaign. Did He listen or do what you are doing? Did He answer questions or ignore people like they are objects?

Christ sometimes preached, sometimes He rebuked, sometimes He taught, but He never taught the lies of evolution or billions of years

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Christ sometimes preached, sometimes He rebuked, sometimes He taught, but He never taught the lies of evolution or billions of years

I serve Christ. I know Christ. Christ is a friend of mine. You sir, are not Christ.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I serve Christ. I know Christ. Christ is a friend of mine. You sir, are not Christ.

that post is strange even for you.
If you know Christ then you know evolution and billions of years are a lie. So you do not know Christ.