Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

[TagliatelliMonster]

Yes and that a classic circular reasoning and false assumption post as can be.

See? Like that. Just a broken record doubling down on intellectual dishonesty ad nauseum, false accusations left and right, general falsehoods all the way down and just plain lying.

That is exactly what this is

Remember that similarity between species does not prove decent at all, but is irrefutable evidence for Creation by the Intelligent Creator, God Almighty. All intelligent creators and designers do this all the time. It makes sense to reuse common design elements.
A Tesla is not the biological descendant of the model T.

And on and on and on and on....

Intellectual dishonesty and bearing false witness is your only gameplan.

It's like you have no self-respect whatsoever.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

See? Like that. Just a broken record doubling down on intellectual dishonesty ad nauseum, false accusations left and right, general falsehoods all the way down and just plain lying.

That is exactly what this is

View attachment 84010





And on and on and on and on....

Intellectual dishonesty and bearing false witness is your only gameplan.

It's like you have no self-respect whatsoever.

Biological enzymes are required for living things to exist and only come from living things.
Checkmate.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Biological enzymes are required for living things to exist and only come from living things.
Checkmate.

And on and on and on and...

When you are ready to have an adult conversation, i'm here for you

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes and that a classic circular reasoning and false assumption post as can be.

How so? Once again, those are not magical words. If you are challenged and have no answer you end up tacitly admitting that you are wrong.

Remember that similarity between species does not prove decent at all, but is irrefutable evidence for Creation by the Intelligent Creator, God Almighty. All intelligent creators and designers do this all the time. It makes sense to reuse common design elements.
A Tesla is not the biological descendant of the model T.

And there you go demonstrating that you have no understanding of the sciences at all.

Science does not do "proof".

The similarity between species is evidence for evolution.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

How so? Once again, those are not magical words. If you are challenged and have no answer you end up tacitly admitting that you are wrong.

And there you go demonstrating that you have no understanding of the sciences at all.

Science does not do "proof".

The similarity between species is evidence for evolution.

So evolution is a science that does not care if it has already been proven false.

Similarity comes from an Intelligent Creator. Unexplained difference and similarities prove evolution false.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So evolution is a science that does not care if it has already been proven false.

It has never been proven false. Only the delusional believe that.

Similarity comes from an Intelligent Creator. Unexplained difference and similarities prove evolution false.

No, you cannot claim "intelligent creation" with all of the bad engineering in life. And an omnipotent omniscient Intelligent Creator would not make the mistake of trying to use the same basic construction. A Intelligent Creator could engineer all life individually. Instead we see traits that are leftovers from our evolutionary past that make no sense if a species was designed some day.

You do not believe in an Intelligent Designer. You believe in an Incompetent Designer.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

So evolution is a science that does not care if it has already been proven false.

That is not even remotely close to what he said.
You are once again bearing false witness.

Similarity comes from an Intelligent Creator. Unexplained difference and similarities prove evolution false.

They are not unexplained. And when you are given the explanation, you dismiss it with even more lies / bearing false witness.

Like I said: dishonesty is your only gameplan.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

That is not even remotely close to what he said.
You are once again bearing false witness.


They are not unexplained. And when you are given the explanation, you dismiss it with even more lies / bearing false witness.

Like I said: dishonesty is your only gameplan.

well he did say that evolution does not do proof, which means true or false
I already proved it false and evolution does not care about that.

 

[YoursTrue]

well he did say that evolution does not do proof, which means true or false
I already proved it false and evolution does not care about that.

@TagliatelliMonster -- evolution evidently doesn't care much about death either. Good morning!

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

well he did say that evolution does not do proof, which means true or false

And if you would have some very basic scientific literacy, you would know why.
But you don't even have that, do you?

Science isn't in the business of "proving" anything. Get some basic education.

I already proved it false and evolution does not care about that.

No, you spread lies and falsehoods and then pretended that that counts as disproving well-established theories.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

@TagliatelliMonster -- evolution evidently doesn't care much about death either. Good morning!

Random irrelevant comment is random and irrelevant.

Would you like some vinegar with that word salad?

 

[shunyadragon]

That is silly. Nobody alive today will be alive by then. Not even 5 gradations or more.
That makes you a silly person too.

BTW. there will be a new heaven and a new earth in about 1000 years.

It was believed by many Christians 1000 years ago, 1500 years ago, and 2000 years ago, At the time of the life of Jesus, many thought it would happen in one generation of the life of Jesus based on what Jesus taught, and guess what? Nothing happened.

By the way, you have not presented any questions that scientists cannot answer concerning evolution.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

It was believed by many Christians 1000 years ago, 1500 years ago, and 2000 years ago, At the time of the life of Jesus, many thought it would happen in one generation of the life of Jesus based on what Jesus taught, and guess what? Nothing happened.

By the way, you have not presented any questions that scientists cannot answer concerning evolution.

They should have caught that with God a day is 1000 years and a thousand years is one day.
What was the first living thing and what features did it have?
They have no answered any original question.

 

[Subduction Zone]

They should have caught that with God a day is 1000 years and a thousand years is one day.
What was the first living thing and what features did it have?
They have no answered any original question.

I have answered that question for you. You did not like the answer or you ignored it. Besides you do not even really get to ask that question until you concede that you lost the topic of debate of this thread. By demanding an answer you have admitted that you lost the debate.

 

[John53]

They should have caught that with God a day is 1000 years and a thousand years is one day.
What was the first living thing and what features did it have?

Which refutes your 6,000 year old universe claim. You do this to yourself all the time which is I why I don't take your claims as anything other than wrong assumptions.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Which refutes your 6,000 year old universe claim. You do this to yourself all the time which is I why I don't take your claims as anything other than wrong assumptions.

Actually it does not as it is for prophecy.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Actually it does not as it is for prophecy.

What?

 

[John53]

Actually it does not as it is for prophecy.

That sentence makes no sense.

 

[shunyadragon]

They should have caught that with God a day is 1000 years and a thousand years is one day.

It still remains in history everybody has been wrong in the past, and there is no consensus as to has the right predictions, and nobody caught anything.

What was the first living thing and what features did it have?
They have no answered any original question.

That question has been answered several times, and by the way ut is not a question involving evolution. It is a question involving abiogenesis.

The first living organism was a single-celled RNA-living organism living around the hydrothermal sea vents of the spreading ocean ridges.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That sentence makes no sense.

I see. So you are saying that it is an improvement.