Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Really? Should I pop my popcorn now or can I get it delivered by Snails R us? I am sure that the evidence for this will be posted in . . . what? Two or three years? Ten years?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Address my points and show that you have some amount of intellectual honesty, or we're done here.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
already did it all.
When will you get at least some rational answer to any question about the origin of anything?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope. Everyone can see that you have not. Even the creationists here have this reaction about your arguments:
Hmm, good question. Oh I know!, when you learn how to ask a rational question. So I guess never?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well never is incorrect/ All will be shown the one true answer.Nope. Everyone can see that you have not. Even the creationists here have this reaction about your arguments:
Hmm, good question. Oh I know!, when you learn how to ask a rational question. So I guess never?
A mere assertion, which you can back up by nothing except a book written by humans between 1,000 BCE until may 180 CE (a period of nearly 1200 years, proving that it was written by many disparate humans -- not one of them knowing anything at all about the science of how the world works).
The cambrian event was about 500 million years ago. That's before the biblical creation was even created.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Great news!! When will that be? Hopefully before next Tuesday.
Pagans? Do you know what the word means?
Can a Christian believe in evolution?
Well, yes! The best demonstration of this is the vast array of leading scientists, pastors and theologians who are both firmly committed to evangelical Christian faith, and believe that for the most part at least, evolution was God's chosen mechanism of creation.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I do not think that he understands even half of the terms that he uses. And he does not seem to want to learn.
Believers tend to just want to believe and reject anything that could possibly harm those believes without any though being involved at all.
Stop! This circular "reasoning" is making me dizzy.
Again, you spew out claims and assertions -- with nothing backing them up but a persistent belief impervious to contrary evidence.
Please at least try to support your claims.
"Delusion." A persistent belief impervious to contrary evidence.
Last edited:
If that mind is a believer, it sure aint christianity.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It clearly is not rational. I would be willing to bet that most Christians do not believe the myths of Genesis. They realize that they are not key to their religious beliefs. The weak in faith have to blaspheme by telling their own God how he had to make the universe. It is rather sad really.
Huh?
It didn't "happen by evolution." Evolution happened during it -- as well as before and after.
And where did you come up with trillions of years? You're just making stuff up, again.
The age of the planet is pretty well known. Have you ever bothered to learn how this is known?
I know how is not your strong suit....
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
All just unproven assumptions. Remember you could not meet the challenge.
Everything, outside of maths, is "unproven."
The "assumptions" are derived from objective, observable, evidence Do you have any non-assumed alternatives to propose?
Remind me again. Which challenge are you referring to?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You keep forgetting that there is no challenge. You failed to properly define your terms. That makes the challenge nonexistent. You know that if you ask politely people would probably even help you with your "challenges". They would still fail, but at least they would not fail in the OP.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I assumed that you would know what an assumption is. Maybe I assumed wrong because you always use an assumption that is false when promoting evolution and billions of years. I have proven my assumption completely.
Can I assume you will try to meet the challenge.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The problem is that you appear to be using the term improperly. That makes it imperative for you to define it. You do not seem to be able to do so. Also, the "no assumptions" rule has to apply to the book of myths that you follow. You keep forgetting that it has never shown to be reliable at all.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And yet irrefutable proofs that you cannot refute. I assume you would have done so by now.