Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They seem pretty noble to me. They laugh at your ignorant nonsense. Okay, that is just mean of them. Hey guys, quit laughing. I am trying to help him to learn . . . Oh great
Now they are laughing at me.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Now they are laughing at me.
!!! - Practically everybody who's had an advanced biology course believes and understands how natural processes produced the intricacies of nature. Before spouting off and declaring something impossible, you might want to understand the mechanisms involved.
Yes, it's way beyond what we humans have created, but nature has had billions of years and uncounted chances to select each tiny step in the process. The steps involved are taught in chemistry and biology courses. You should take some before you so vociferously weigh in.
Evidence.......
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And who cares?They seem pretty noble to me. They laugh at your ignorant nonsense. Okay, that is just mean of them. Hey guys, quit laughing. I am trying to help him to learn . . . Oh great
Evolutionists are running a comedy show where the evolutionists say, “ask us anything about origins”. So, you start asking them questions. And each time they say, “I do not know”. After a while you give up, they then say, “is there any other question that you want answered?”
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Where did we say that? And you do not seem to understand that it is assumed that the person one is talking to is being honest.
You keep asking pointless questions that are no different from me asking you what color God's underwear is.
Does your inability to answer that question refute God? Why or why not?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Where did the universe come from?
If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?
If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect.
It also violates every law of conservation too.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Sorry, I am not going to go into science that is far beyond you. The fact is that evolution does not rely on the Big Bang. We know that the universe is old whether there was a Big Bang or not. That means by shifting the goalposts this far you have conceded the evolution argument. That is if you are honest. If you honestly admit that evolution is a fact then we can discuss the Big Bang. Otherwise you need to discuss it with someone else.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Actually it does because without ant laws of nature or even existence there is no evolution,
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Now you are making the wrong assumption that without the Big Bang there could be no laws of nature. Sorry, logic does not work that way. We know that the laws of nature are there, Big Bang or no Big Bang.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Talk about making an assumption and a bad assumption at that.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Oopsy you ran off in the middle of our discussion about the Cambrian Explosion.
Still waiting for your response to Post #538. And no, your usual technique of ignoring it and handwaving it away won't fly this time.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Never gonna have evolution do that in trillions of trillions of years.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Cool, so you concede your "argument" yet again.
Awesome. So we won't see you making it anymore, since you can't back it up or provide an adequate response to counterpoints.
Next!
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
What was the assumption? What was wrong with it?
All that you have are false claims about others that you can never support.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
The no God assumption and the false circular reasoning assumptions
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I did not make a "no God assumption" nor did I use circular reasoning.
Making false claims about others is not supporting your claims.
Would you like to try again?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Again with the false accusations
And of course you are using the no God assumptions
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL! Oh my! Prove it.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
My multiple proofs that you wrong
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Your "proofs" have all been refuted.
You know it and I know it. Please try to be serious.
Why ask this? You know this unknown, and you don't know it, either.
Before time, there was no "before." Why can you not grasp this?
Yes. Cause and effect is a relative, material world phenomenon.
The laws of conservation formed shortly after the BB.