Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Oh please, I refuted your silly induction. Twice now. Your other arguments were just as bad. You only "proved" that you do not know what a logical argument is.
Do you want to learn why your induction argument fails?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Do you want to learn why your induction argument fails?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Please refute if you can, but you cannot.
I was once in New You City but I knew it was the result of intelligent beings.
Do you?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I already did so. And yes, I know what real "intelligent design" looks like.
But let's go over the basics of a logical argument. Logical arguments are always based upon premises. Do you understand that?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You are kidding right?
Have you had a biology course above the intro level?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
The no God assumption is false.
Read Genesis 1.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes. Too bad that you have not had one. Why do you ask? No biology teaches that there is evidence of a designer.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
A book of myths does not help you. And what "no God assumption"? It appears that you are breaking the Ninth again by bearing false witness against others.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Is transcription amazing.
You're extrapolating your familiar, human world of intention and design to nature or physics. That doesn't follow.
What does that have to do with logic or argumentation? SZ is trying to help you understand. Try to pay attention.
As for the biology course, what's your point here? Please clarify.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, but that is no evidence. You really need to learn what is and what is not evidence.
"Wow! That's neato!" is not evidence for a designer or a god.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, let him continue. I just realized that he used New York City. That must mean that he is about to prove that Spiderman is real. He was always my childhood favorite.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well, anyone who has had an advanced biology course must know that natural processes could never have produced something so advanced and intricate. Way beyond anything man has ever created. Blows away all of his inventions.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is wrong since advanced biology course teach exactly the opposite. You keep confirming that you have never studied any of the sciences.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I have had advanced biology courses and they describe the glory of God's creation.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you really did not. You may have had indoctrination courses at a Christian institution, but no reputable, and clearly not Ivy League college would ever make such an error.
You keep refuting your own claims.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I keep refuting you pet theories which are just the Theory of Nothing. No almighty god just circular reasoning.
OK. So what's your evidence of this God?
NB: Genesis is not evidence.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
More falsehoods. Where is your Nobel Prize?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well there is nothing noble about the false theory of evolution and billions of years.