Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

[SavedByTheLord]

Evidence.......

Why ask this? You know this unknown, and you don't know it, either.

Before time, there was no "before." Why can you not grasp this?

Yes. Cause and effect is a relative, material world phenomenon.

The laws of conservation formed shortly after the BB.

And that is not science,

 

[Valjean]

Actually it does because without ant laws of nature or even existence there is no evolution,

Nor can bread be baked -- yet we have bread, and the process is known.

 

[Valjean]

Never gonna have evolution do that in trillions of trillions of years.

Evidence, please. Support your claim.
What alternative do you propose? Magic?

The no God assumption and the false circular reasoning assumptions

The no God assumption is reasonable inasmuch as the burden for the God claim is on you, and you have not met your burden.
And where is this circular reasoning you keep going on about?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Evidence, please. Support your claim.
What alternative do you propose? Magic?

God Almighty versus the no god of the theory of nothing with their no answer to any question about the origin of anything,

 

[Valjean]

And that is not science,

Huh? Not following....

 

[Valjean]

God Almighty versus the no god of the theory of nothing with their no answer to any question about the origin of anything,

But your God claim has no material evidence, and no God is needed for evolution to happen. The mechanisms of change are automatic and known.

Origins? Why do you keep going on about this? It's been explained that origins are irrelevant to this discipline. They're also irrelevant to metallurgy, æronautics and kelp farming, yet these are legitimate disciplines relying on real facts and producing real results.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

But your God claim has no material evidence, and no God is needed for evolution to happen. The mechanisms of change are automatic and known.

Origins? Why do you keep going on about this? It's been explained that origins are irrelevant to this discipline. They're also irrelevant to metallurgy, æronautics and kelp farming, yet these are legitimate disciplines relying on real facts and producing real results.

So for the evolutionists truth means nothing.

 

[McBell]

I have seen evolutionist try to explain the Cambrian explosion but they have nothing that is rational .

I understand you will not be able to comprehend this, but...
Your not understanding it does not make it irrational.

Of course, I freely admit that I am assuming it is because you do not understand it.
I mean, it could very well be you are just being dishonest.


Would you be so kind as to clarify which?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I

What was the first living thing made of? Was it DNA? Was it RNA? Was it just proteins? Was it some mix?

What was its code? How many amino acids did it have? When did it come into being?

How many kinds of proteins did it have? How many of each?

 

[McBell]

God Almighty versus the no god of the theory of nothing with their no answer to any question about the origin of anything,

Bearing false witness

 

[McBell]

So for the evolutionists truth means nothing.

you just can not stop yourself, can you?

 

[McBell]

What was the first living thing made of? Was it DNA? Was it RNA? Was it just proteins? Was it some mix?

What was its code? How many amino acids did it have? When did it come into being?

How many kinds of proteins did it have? How many of each?

I have no interest in engaging your strawman.

Perhaps it is time for a new song and dance?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I have no interest in engaging your strawman.

Perhaps it is time for a new song and dance?

No interest in answering some simple questions.

 

[McBell]

No interest in answering some simple questions.

bearing false witness.

I flat out said I will not be engaging your strawman.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

bearing false witness.

I flat out said I will not be engaging your strawman.

And you cannot answer simple questions. Why?

Why is there too much C-14 in some samples of coal and fossilized wood?
How do you explain ancient microbes revived?

How do you explain parentless polonium 210 radiohaloes in granites?

How do you explain elliptical polonium 210 halos in the same strata with circular halos?

 

[McBell]

And you cannot answer simple questions. Why?

Why is there too much C-14 in some samples of coal and fossilized wood?
How do you explain ancient microbes revived?

How do you explain parentless polonium 210 radiohaloes in granites?

How do you explain elliptical polonium 210 halos in the same strata with circular halos?

You bear false witness saying I cannot answer it.

I already stated I am not going to be engaging your strawman.

If this shallow victory is all you need, then by all means, run with it.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You bear false witness saying I cannot answer it.

I already stated I am not going to be engaging your strawman.

If this shallow victory is all you need, then by all means, run with it.

If you actually give a correct answer I may fall over at this point.

How do you explain ancient microbes revived?

 

[McBell]

If you actually give a correct answer I may fall over at this point.

With as low as you set the bar, this is no surprise.

How do you explain ancient microbes revived?

I don't

 

[SavedByTheLord]

With as low as you set the bar, this is no surprise.


I don't

I rest my case.

There is a great deception in some of the ages that are quoted by evolutionists. Why the deception?

 

[McBell]

I rest my case.

I doubt it.

There is a great deception in some of the ages that are quoted by evolutionists. Why the deception?

Well lookie there, it didn't even last a whole post.[