• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I already have. Your only answers were denial. Denial is not a refutation. i showed you the ten year difference between the date of birth of Jesus in Luke and in Matthew. You had no coherent response. All that you had was denial and nonsense. By the way, I did not find that. Biblical scholars found that. Real scholars. Not apologists. I am betting that you do not know the difference. And most of those scholars probably were Christians.

I brought up the failed Tyre prophecy. You demonstrated that you did not understand it.

And then of course there are Genesis and Exodus, if one makes the mistake of reading the Bible literally.
Real scholars. You do not know the Bible at all.
And you just keep fulfilling Biblical prophecy.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Real scholars. You do not know the Bible at all.
And you just keep fulfilling Biblical prophecy.
I guess that is your way of admitting that you are wrong since you use that every time someone shows that you are in error.

So thank you for admitting that you are wrong.

If you were right you would be able to come up with some sort of coherent argument.


You know that I do not really like beating up on someone that has almost no knowledge of any of the topics that he debates about. That is why I so often try to help you to learn a little. This is just boring and rather pathetic.

I will let you rant and scream a bit. Good night.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Maybe Mao was. Hitler was a mixed bag. Stalin definitely was not. He was a Lysenkoist. And Marx was mixed too.


But of course you got cause and effect wrong. I bet that you don't have a clue as to how you screwed up.
They all were evolutionists, some communists and some socialists.
And abortion which has killed over 2 billion innocent children in heinous manner is also from evolution.

That is over 3 billion murdered and billions more with their lived destroyed.

Darwin begat Marx and Marx begat Hitler, Mao and Stalin and abortion too.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
They all were evolutionists, some communists and some socialists.
And abortion which has killed over 2 billion innocent children in heinous manner is also from evolution.

That is over 3 billion murdered and billions more with their lived destroyed.

Darwin begat Marx and Marx begat Hitler, Mao and Stalin and abortion too.
Nope, this is one of your more foolish posts. It is just an ignorant ad hominem attack.


And you forgot that the Bible itself is more pro abortion than anti abortion. Haven't you ever read it? It is clear that you have never understood it.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Nope, this is one of your more foolish posts. It is just an ignorant ad hominem attack.


And you forgot that the Bible itself is more pro abortion than anti abortion. Haven't you ever read it? It is clear that you have never understood it.
I have read and of course it is anti abortion.
Remember you are not saved so how would you know what it says.
But you do fulfill its prophecy. and very many times
 

Alien826

No religious beliefs
Your questions are answered in Genesis 1. God created all things with His Almighty power.
"Almighty power", eh? I hope you see that this tells us nothing about how it was done. And it only seems fair that you supply the same level of detail that you demand of us when you ask us about evolution and so on.
Because the universe is not an intelligent creator.
Therfore, the intelligent Creator must be a being, aka, God.
OK, give us details of this creator. Not just vague descriptions but real detailed descriptions that we can check, in the same way that we supply details of the Big Bang and so on. So far we have the claim that the universe had an intelligent creator. If accepted, that establishes one thing only about this creator. It can create universes. Now, what else can it do? Please supply full details with evidence and calculations as you demand of us.


The atheist has no almighty so he must deny the real Almighty God and try and make a god for himself to worship, aka, the devil. Just as the old pagans worshipped a statue or the sun in their delusion, so the atheist must worship a thing, in this case the universe so he does not look so stupid as worshipping a statue.
So the atheist says the universe always was, and that with time all things are possible, What an hypocrisy. With God all things are possible but with time not all things are possible,
That is why I have concentrated on some of the biggest delusions of evolution and billions of years like the first living creature.

All an atheist says is that he lacks belief in god/s. All the rest is unevidenced claims on your part. To continue with my theme, please supply detailed evidence that supports what you say about atheists, in particular that atheists worship the universe, or the devil (better start by giving evidence for the existence of any such creature).

Do you see where I'm going with all this? How does it feel to have your own little game (of endlessly asking for more and more evidence and supplying none of your own) turned against you? Annoying, right?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
"Almighty power", eh? I hope you see that this tells us nothing about how it was done. And it only seems fair that you supply the same level of detail that you demand of us when you ask us about evolution and so on.

OK, give us details of this creator. Not just vague descriptions but real detailed descriptions that we can check, in the same way that we supply details of the Big Bang and so on. So far we have the claim that the universe had an intelligent creator. If accepted, that establishes one thing only about this creator. It can create universes. Now, what else can it do? Please supply full details with evidence and calculations as you demand of us.




All an atheist says is that he lacks belief in god/s. All the rest is unevidenced claims on your part. To continue with my theme, please supply detailed evidence that supports what you say about atheists, in particular that atheists worship the universe, or the devil (better start by giving evidence for the existence of any such creature).

Do you see where I'm going with all this? How does it feel to have your own little game (of endlessly asking for more and more evidence and supplying none of your own) turned against you? Annoying, right?
I play no games.

If you believe the redshift con job, the universe has been expanding a lot less than the speed of light for billions of years. And even the most distant galaxies are expanding less than the speed of light and they were the earliest.
It is a failure of the Big Bang model. The size of the universe is supposedly 94 billion light years, and the universe is supposedly 13.7 billion years old. The universe is expanding at a rate less the speed of light. The space itself is expanding less that the speed of light. How could the universe be 7x larger in light years than its age? In 13.7 billion years it should have expanded less than 13.7 billion light years vs 94 billion light years.
In fact, many are now finding irrefutable proof that the redshift theory is false, that the universe is not expanding at all, and that there was no Big Bang. Many are refuting the Big Bang, and they are not just YEC scientists.
Now Inflation is just the Big Fudge Factors so they can try to fine tune their theory to explain major contradictions to the Big Hoax of the Big Bang. So, if inflation is true, answer these required questions.

When did inflation start? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to start? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
When did inflation end? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to end? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
Please provide a graph of the acceleration due to inflation vs time graph, as it must meet ALL the facts.
What is the mass energy of the inflation particle or is it 2 particles, one to start and one to end?
Why have they not found the inflation particle yet?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I play no games.
You assume your God exists because you interpret the Bible literally.

You also claim that your God created everything.

Cancer exists, and since your God created everything it includes cancers.

Since what you claim is true, and that everything your God created was good, cancers are good.

Cancers that kill children is good because all that God creates is good. God has done nothing to end cancers in human biology, so this confirms that God sees cancer as good. Doctors that work to cure cancers must be doing Satan's work since they are trying to interfere with God's will to cause cancer in those affacted by His plan.
 

Alien826

No religious beliefs
I play no games.

If you believe the redshift con job, the universe has been expanding a lot less than the speed of light for billions of years. And even the most distant galaxies are expanding less than the speed of light and they were the earliest.
It is a failure of the Big Bang model. The size of the universe is supposedly 94 billion light years, and the universe is supposedly 13.7 billion years old. The universe is expanding at a rate less the speed of light. The space itself is expanding less that the speed of light. How could the universe be 7x larger in light years than its age? In 13.7 billion years it should have expanded less than 13.7 billion light years vs 94 billion light years.
In fact, many are now finding irrefutable proof that the redshift theory is false, that the universe is not expanding at all, and that there was no Big Bang. Many are refuting the Big Bang, and they are not just YEC scientists.
Now Inflation is just the Big Fudge Factors so they can try to fine tune their theory to explain major contradictions to the Big Hoax of the Big Bang. So, if inflation is true, answer these required questions.

When did inflation start? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to start? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
When did inflation end? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to end? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
Please provide a graph of the acceleration due to inflation vs time graph, as it must meet ALL the facts.
What is the mass energy of the inflation particle or is it 2 particles, one to start and one to end?
Why have they not found the inflation particle yet?

There you go again.

Why should anyone even attempt to answer any of that when you refuse to do the same about your own beliefs?

I've made my point. End of discussion.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Evolutionists have made the claim and so you must prove it.
There is no burden of "proof" with a creationist. The concept applies to dialectic, which requires two or more critical thinkers cooperatively rebutting one another until one produces a plausible argument that the other cannot rebut resolving the matter for both of them. The creationist can't do that. He is closed-minded by faith and unwilling and/or unable to evaluate an argument for soundness and unwilling to be convinced by such an argument even if he could recognize one.
Your questions are answered in Genesis 1
What else do you have?
The atheist has no almighty so he must deny the real Almighty God and try and make a god for himself to worship, aka, the devil. Just as the old pagans worshipped a statue or the sun in their delusion, so the atheist must worship a thing, in this case the universe so he does not look so stupid as worshipping a statue.
Atheists are people with no use for gods, religion, or worshiping. That's for you to contend with. And hell, and sin. The spiritual atheist has a direct relationship with nature, and it not worship. That's a practice beneath an atheistic humanist who is also an autonomous moral agent and free citizen. He loves nature without worshiping it. It inspires awe, mystery, and gratitude, as well as a warm sense of belonging and connection This is the opposite of the alienation from nature that Abrahamic religions teach with its ghost that lives outside of nature having contempt for both man and nature as it issues threats and commands.
I worship the God who authored the Bible.
That's nice.
Inspired by God.
Not good enough. The Flintstones were inspired by the Honeymooners.
you just keep fulfilling Biblical prophecy.
You keep fulfilling my prophecy, which is that you will continue this creationist dance indefinitely starting thread after thread representing yourself as knowledgeable about science while offering only scientific error and specious argument. And I'm right. You will keep doing this until you lose interest, which may be never.
And who would that be? Which God?
Yours, the god of Abraham, who has two teams in that war.
you are not saved
Neither are you. Nobody is saved or needs saving from an imagined fate.
I play no games.
You never stop playing games. Two of your favorites are sealioning (incessant request for information you have no interest in), perseveration (incessant repetition), and the Gish gallop (long lists).
When did inflation start? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to start? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
When did inflation end? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to end? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
Please provide a graph of the acceleration due to inflation vs time graph, as it must meet ALL the facts.
What is the mass energy of the inflation particle or is it 2 particles, one to start and one to end?
Why have they not found the inflation particle yet?
Oh, look! It's time to play again.
I already proved the Bible is true.
You've never proved anything in any of your threads. Science, however, has demonstrated that much of the Bible wrong. The six days of creation thing is wrong. So is the Adam and Eve thing. And the global flood is also just mythology, not truth.
not all the axes are labeled
Hope this helps:

1696782949771.png
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I have read and of course it is anti abortion.
Remember you are not saved so how would you know what it says.
But you do fulfill its prophecy. and very many times
You may believe that because you do have a difficult time understanding your own book of myths at times. You often don't understand context or poetic writing. And then to add to your troubles you insist on using an outdated translation that uses euphemism, and colorful poetic language quite often.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
You may believe that because you do have a difficult time understanding your own book of myths at times. You often don't understand context or poetic writing. And then to add to your troubles you insist on using an outdated translation that uses euphemism, and colorful poetic language quite often.
An unsaved person will not understand much from the Bible.
 
Top