• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
So much for free will then....
Well it does say this.

25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
26 And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will. - 2 Tim 2:25-26
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
It is becoming well-established that this is the best that we are going to see in response to anything posted here. Accusations of accusations and nothing of substance. Claims without support or merit seems to be the fodder that the entire position is based on. Attempts to redirect the burden of proof and somehow "win" by default without effort seems to be the order of this particular version of science denial. I suppose when all else fails, portraying oneself as a victim must seem like a good idea. I can't imagine it is good witness. I wouldn't do it.

It isn't much of a victory to recognize a pattern and see it played out in heavy rotation when the pattern doesn't measure up to what it is supposed to represent based on the evidence I've seen so far. I know from reading here, that I'm the only one to recognize it or that it wasn't recognized early in the limited life of these related threads.

I do have to admire the persistence. Especially in light of the fact that the attempts are so obvious and that no one has missed what is being attempted. Perhaps one has missed it, but that may be willful.

“If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?”​

― Sam Harris
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I play no games.

If you believe the redshift con job, the universe has been expanding a lot less than the speed of light for billions of years. And even the most distant galaxies are expanding less than the speed of light and they were the earliest.
It is a failure of the Big Bang model. The size of the universe is supposedly 94 billion light years, and the universe is supposedly 13.7 billion years old. The universe is expanding at a rate less the speed of light. The space itself is expanding less that the speed of light. How could the universe be 7x larger in light years than its age? In 13.7 billion years it should have expanded less than 13.7 billion light years vs 94 billion light years.
In fact, many are now finding irrefutable proof that the redshift theory is false, that the universe is not expanding at all, and that there was no Big Bang. Many are refuting the Big Bang, and they are not just YEC scientists.
Now Inflation is just the Big Fudge Factors so they can try to fine tune their theory to explain major contradictions to the Big Hoax of the Big Bang. So, if inflation is true, answer these required questions.

When did inflation start? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to start? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
When did inflation end? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.
What caused it to end? Of course, this violates cause and effect.
Please provide a graph of the acceleration due to inflation vs time graph, as it must meet ALL the facts.
What is the mass energy of the inflation particle or is it 2 particles, one to start and one to end?
Why have they not found the inflation particle yet?
Ooops. You failed to meet the challenge. Again.
What are we at now, like, 0 for 6?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Haven't seen any such thing.
Well if you can refute my infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago according to Genesis 1, then please post.
One used the law of non contradiction, the other mathematical induction.
And if you meet my challenge of showing something older then 6000 years old without an assumption, give it a try.

As to answering the origin questions which no evolutionists or billions of years person can do, here are a few of the easy ones.

Where did the universe come from?

If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?

If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect. It also violates every law of conservation too.

If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?

If that thing always existed, that violates the law of increasing entropy.

If that thing has not always existed, what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?

Please continue this until you get something that has always been.

And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.

Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

Where did the orderly and fine-tuned laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

What was the first living thing made of? Was it DNA? Was it RNA? Was it just proteins? Was it some mix?

What was its code? How many amino acids did it have? When did it come into being?

How many kinds of proteins did it have? How many of each?

Where did it come into being? In space? In the atmosphere? In the ocean? In a tide pool?

In clay or mud? What protected it from UV rays? What was the composition of the atmosphere at that time?

If it was in water, how did the amino acids keep from being dissipated by the water?

What was the energy source for these reactions?

Where there any enzymes in it? Which ones? Certain required reactions need enzymes as catalysts. If not, the reaction may take a vast number of years. Surely the primitive thing could not last more than a minute much less than many years.

How did it survive? Where did the protective layer come from? What was the protected layer? How did that part get reproduced?

How was it able to divide itself? The protective layer must also divide and then close.

What was its food source? How did it remove waste? How did it repair itself? How did these things move in and out of the protective layer since they must be gated.

Please explain how it was ever able to reproduce itself.

If the first living thing was just proteins, how did it ever get evolve to use RNA and DNA? They are irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.

If it was just RNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use DNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.

If it was just DNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use RNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.

It is was any mixture of these, then how could it or DNA, RNA, or proteins have evolved at all?
 

McBell

Unbound
Well if you can refute my infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago according to Genesis 1, then please post.
One used the law of non contradiction, the other mathematical induction.
And if you meet my challenge of showing something older then 6000 years old without an assumption, give it a try.

As to answering the origin questions which no evolutionists or billions of years person can do, here are a few of the easy ones.

Where did the universe come from?

If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?

If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect. It also violates every law of conservation too.

If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?

If that thing always existed, that violates the law of increasing entropy.

If that thing has not always existed, what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?

Please continue this until you get something that has always been.

And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.

Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

Where did the orderly and fine-tuned laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

What was the first living thing made of? Was it DNA? Was it RNA? Was it just proteins? Was it some mix?

What was its code? How many amino acids did it have? When did it come into being?

How many kinds of proteins did it have? How many of each?

Where did it come into being? In space? In the atmosphere? In the ocean? In a tide pool?

In clay or mud? What protected it from UV rays? What was the composition of the atmosphere at that time?

If it was in water, how did the amino acids keep from being dissipated by the water?

What was the energy source for these reactions?

Where there any enzymes in it? Which ones? Certain required reactions need enzymes as catalysts. If not, the reaction may take a vast number of years. Surely the primitive thing could not last more than a minute much less than many years.

How did it survive? Where did the protective layer come from? What was the protected layer? How did that part get reproduced?

How was it able to divide itself? The protective layer must also divide and then close.

What was its food source? How did it remove waste? How did it repair itself? How did these things move in and out of the protective layer since they must be gated.

Please explain how it was ever able to reproduce itself.

If the first living thing was just proteins, how did it ever get evolve to use RNA and DNA? They are irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.

If it was just RNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use DNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.

If it was just DNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use RNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.

It is was any mixture of these, then how could it or DNA, RNA, or proteins have evolved at all?
You have already been refuted numerous times by numerous members.
All you have proven in this and all your other threads is that you do not learn anything.

when is a black dog most likely to enter a white house?
Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds?
How did a fool and his money get together?
What do they use to ship styrofoam?
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?
Does fuzzy logic tickle?
If a stealth bomber crashes in a forest, will it make a sound?
Would a fly without wings be called a walk?
Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic?

If you throw a cat out a car window does it become kitty liter?
When you choke a smurf, what color does it turn?
Why do they call it a TV set when you only get one?
What was the best thing before sliced bread?
If corn oil comes from corn, where does baby oil come from?
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?

Is it possible to be totally partial?
What's another word for thesaurus?
What do you do when you see an endangered animal that eats only endangered plants?
Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?
If you're cross-eyed and have dyslexia, can you read all right?

You know how most packages say "Open here"?
What is the protocol if the package says, "Open somewhere else"?

Personally, I find my nonsensical questions much more interesting.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
You have already been refuted numerous times by numerous members.
All you have proven in this and all your other threads is that you do not learn anything.

when is a black dog most likely to enter a white house?
Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds?
How did a fool and his money get together?
What do they use to ship styrofoam?
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?
Does fuzzy logic tickle?
If a stealth bomber crashes in a forest, will it make a sound?
Would a fly without wings be called a walk?
Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic?

If you throw a cat out a car window does it become kitty liter?
When you choke a smurf, what color does it turn?
Why do they call it a TV set when you only get one?
What was the best thing before sliced bread?
If corn oil comes from corn, where does baby oil come from?
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?

Is it possible to be totally partial?
What's another word for thesaurus?
What do you do when you see an endangered animal that eats only endangered plants?
Do hungry crows have ravenous appetites?
If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages?
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?
If you're cross-eyed and have dyslexia, can you read all right?

You know how most packages say "Open here"?
What is the protocol if the package says, "Open somewhere else"?

Personally, I find my nonsensical questions much more interesting.
That was a very reasonable post by evolutionists standards.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
That was a very reasonable post by evolutionists standards.
Evolutionists standards?!?!!? There is no such thing!

The standards are Methodological Naturalism based on objective verifiable evidence. Scientists regardless of discipline follow these standards.
 
Top