Oh, philosophy question. Maybe some of resident philosophers can help us with this one. And which came first. The duck, the goose or the egg?
This discussion may answer that as it seems to be a big goose egg.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
This discussion may answer that as it seems to be a big goose egg.
South American pre-duck.
For a moment, I forgot what thread we are on, but I realized that will get repeated in the morning. So no worries.
Now you've brought up pre-ducks. This is just spiraling out of control and we still don't know which came first and why the other one is still around.
Are they particularly shrill and loud or just easily startled?
But not for long, I'm planning on taking over the thread with my army of billions of ducks which cannot be refuted and they don't use ramps.
I'm not sure but I did watch someone shoot one with a bow and arrow on Naked and Afraid. Apparently they taste good when you haven't eaten for a month.
Screamer - Wikipedia
There is a study that indicates that domestic ducks may have "originated from another wild duck population that is currently undefined or unsampled, rather than from present-day mallard and/or Chinese spot-billed ducks, as previously thought". But I haven't found anything yet on the origin of ducks themselves.
Guo, Xing, Xin-Xin He, Hong Chen, Zhi-Cheng Wang, Hui-Fang Li, Jiang-Xian Wang, Ming-Shan Wang, and Run-Shen Jiang. "Revisiting the evolutionary history of domestic and wild ducks based on genomic analyses." Zoological Research 42, no. 1 (2021): 43.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Yeah, the theory of evolution with decline might help you to figure, you think? And maybe have an answer as to if religion is part of the human process of evolutionary movement...hey, have a good one and hope you enjoy eating your ducks...
Sort of remind me of a cassowary.I'm not sure but I did watch someone shoot one with a bow and arrow on Naked and Afraid. Apparently they taste good when you haven't eaten for a month.
Screamer - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I'm sure lots of things taste fantastic when you're starving.
Interesting. I don't know a lot about domestic ducks other than Mallards have become a threat to our Pacific Black Ducks because of cross breeding.
I have refuted your billions of ducks with my mighty equation. There were only 6,000 ducks.
We are seeing a similar problem in trees with Bradford pears introgressing into the cherry tree population.
I searched and found this and it leads to numerous other links. I'm down a rabbit hole of Chinese domestic duck research. It seems the Chinese are way ahead of us.
I don't know. I think you can duck with the best of them.
I find searching for material outside my specialty to be both interesting and daunting when there is a lot of work on the subject and bits of the subject. You have to have a lot of background knowledge to help narrow the search.
The former Isaac's Deli had a delicious Mallard sandwich ( however, minus the Mallard )
Cross breeding only goes so far because of the Creator's boundry line " after its own kind " - Genesis 1:20-25
It's a pity no one can define what a "kind" is.
Birds are birds
Cats are cats
Dogs are dogs
Horses are horses
Elephants are elephants
Fish are fish
None go beyond their ' kind '
See taxonomy to understand species and the kind.
Science-biology has much to offer if you want to learn about species and the variety of 'kind'.