'love' and mutual 'respect' is what would solve that problem.
Gods word says that a man should love his wife as he does himself. Im sure he would never abuse himself.
The number of drug addicts out there suggest otherwise.
I wonder why you put quotes around 'love' and 'respect' as if they aren't real?
So why must there be a marriage? If there is love and mutual respect in my relationships, what's wrong with them?
most people today do not get married. They prefer to stay single and sleep with many women.
and men.
Actually, reality is that teens and young adults are having fewer sexual partners. They're having sex, but not with more partners. They're not getting pregnant as often as they used to be either.
Whereas, if they held to the bible moral standards, they would wait until they were married and then fulfill their sexual desire in a safe and constructive manner with someone they love.
You're basically saying that if people were good they'd be good.
The people who are going to be good, are already good. The ones who were abusive have always been abusive.
As an example, whereas if everyone followed the principles of the Blessed Elua *religious figure from fiction* they would love where they willed - however many partners they liked, as long as all were pleased, and a separation was friendly and accepted. Sex is an act of worship, and one of love at the same time. Rape would be not only a crime, but blasphemy. The people who followed those laws would also "be good" because i'm defining good by setting the standard.
The thing is that not everyone who broke that standard by being monogamous -odd in this society - was necessarily bad. It is breaking the standard by harming others that is bad.
Just as not everyone who breaks the biblical standard is bad, unless in the process they're harming others. Obviously some people believe that anything outside of the standard is harm, but I don't really see that proving true.
What im trying to say is that when people only want sex for their own gratification, they are not concerned for the wellbeing of the person they choose to have sex with. And if they are not concerned for that persons wellbeing, then abuse or usury follows.
And polyamory is literally "many loves." You can't truly love someone and not want the best for them, not love them and abuse them at the same time.
So, what's bad isn't breaking the standard, it's harming others - abusing them or mistreating them.
sure they can, but they dont need to have sex with the person to express such care.
Neither do married couples. But it's a very human thing to do, isn't it? I mean, the Shakers disagreed to rather distressing results.
rape can also include the act of taking advantage of someone for sex. Even the courts recognize this is a form of rape....eg if you have sex with a drunk person, and they sober up and report it to the police, you can be charged for rape.
Because there's no consent given. You can't consent to sex if you're blackout drunk. Rape is still far more about the power differential. I will TAKE sex from you because I deserve it, and if you are drunk then you REALLY deserve to have sex taken from you. (As the courts tell the women who went to bed alone and woke up with someone on top of them, inside of them, etc. :sarcastic)